Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX500
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
91 Imaging
43 Features
56 Overall
48
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 236g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Released April 2015
- Replaced the Sony WX350
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX500 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Sony WX500, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and WX500 (18MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SP-565UZ was released 7 years earlier than the WX500 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the SP-565UZ grades against the WX500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX500 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-565UZ & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Sony WX500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Sony WX500
SP-565UZ | WX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony WX500 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
WX500 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2015 | January 2009 | Newer by 76 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Sony WX500
SP-565UZ | WX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ offers physical measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Sony WX500 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Sony WX500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the SP-565UZ vs the WX500.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-565UZ and WX500 is 72 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading specifications. The image here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-565UZ and WX500.
To sum up, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Sony WX500 to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sony WX500 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-01-15 | 2015-04-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413 grams (0.91 pounds) | 236 grams (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 30 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $400 | $348 |