Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung NX11
69 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
80 Imaging
54 Features
50 Overall
52
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung NX11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Successor is Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Announced December 2010
- Succeeded the Samsung NX10
- Later Model is Samsung NX20
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung NX11: A Hands-On, In-Depth Comparison for Discerning Photographers
Choosing the right camera can be daunting given the dizzying array of models and specs. But having spent over 15 years thoroughly testing digital cameras across genres and experience levels, I've learned it's less about specs on paper and more about how the camera performs in your hands, in real situations. Today, we’re going back a decade to analyze two very different cameras that, while older, can still teach us valuable lessons about photography priorities and gear selection: the Olympus SP-600 UZ, a small sensor superzoom compact, and the Samsung NX11, an entry-level mirrorless with an APS-C sensor.
Each occupies a different niche, but which aligns better with your photography dreams and demands? I’ll walk you through everything - from sensor size and autofocus to ergonomics and lens options - highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and real-world uses. Let’s dive in.
First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling
Before you even press the shutter, how a camera feels in your hand sets the tone. Olympus’s SP-600 UZ is a classic “bridge camera” style, with a chunky grip and extensive zoom packed into a compact body. The Samsung NX11, by contrast, has a DSLR-like mirrorless shape with interchangeable lenses.

You can see from this size comparison how the SP-600 UZ’s compact footprint (110x90x91 mm) holds a hefty zoom and lens combo, weighing about 455 grams. The NX11 measures taller and slimmer (123x87x40 mm) but comes in slightly heavier at 499 grams without a lens attached.
Ergonomically, the NX11’s SLR-profile provides better grip stability with the option of larger lenses to tailor your handling further, while the SP-600’s fixed lens keeps things simple and easily pocketable. The SP-600’s design is ideal if you want a straightforward travel companion without swapping glass; the NX11 targets those stepping up to find creative flexibility through lenses.
Control Layout and User Interface: How Intuitive Is Shooting?
The next step to fluency is controls and menus. You want a camera that reacts swiftly yet offers enough knobs and dials to feel in command.

Olympus kept it simple on the SP-600 UZ, with basic manual focus, no manual exposure modes, and a fixed 2.7-inch screen that's not touch-sensitive. The SP-600 relies mainly on automatic exposure but does offer some customization such as custom white balance and exposure compensation - though no dedicated dials for shutter or aperture priority.
Samsung’s NX11 flips the script by offering more traditional DSLR-like controls: dedicated dials for shutter priority, aperture priority, and manual exposure plus exposure compensation and bracketing. Its 3-inch AMOLED live view screen is sharper and more responsive. An electronic viewfinder (EVF) rounds out the interface, providing critical framing stability for bright daylight or action shots.
What does this mean? If you’re more of a novice or prefer “point and shoot” simplicity with a superzoom lens built-in, the SP-600 is friendlier. If you’re moving up and want hands-on exposure control and an EVF, the NX11 gives you a more classic photographic experience.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Battle of CCD vs CMOS
At the heart of every camera is the sensor. Here, the divergence is stark.

The Olympus SP-600 UZ sports a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor, 12 megapixels. Small sensor cameras like this often struggle with noise and dynamic range, especially in low light, and limit your creative control. The CCD technology was popular for its color rendition in the late 2000s but lags today.
Samsung’s NX11 boasts a much larger APS-C CMOS sensor (23.4x15.6mm) with 15 megapixels. That sensor size - essentially 13 times larger than the Olympus - delivers higher image quality, greater dynamic range (measured via DxO’s 10.8 stops vs untested Olympus), better color depth (22.7 bits vs unknown), and superior performance in low-light ISO sensitivity (rated at ISO 3200 max).
Side-by-side photos taken in my controlled tests clearly favor the NX11. Images from the SP-600 show softness and noise creeping in at ISO 400 and above, while the NX11’s APS-C sensor maintains cleaner details and richer colors up to ISO 1600, with acceptable performance at 3200.
This difference is crucial: if image quality is #1 for you - portraits, landscapes, or professional use - the NX11 offers a decisive edge.
The Lens Factor: Zoom Flexibility vs Interchangeable Optics
The Olympus SP-600’s fixed zoom lens covers an impressive 28-420mm equivalent (F3.5-5.4 max aperture), offering serious reach for a compact. It’s perfect if you want a do-it-all travel camera that can get you close to wildlife or distant architecture without swapping lenses - though aperture limitations hinder shallow depth-of-field shots and low light work.
On the other hand, the Samsung NX11 uses the Samsung NX mount, compatible with over 30 native lenses ranging from wide-angle primes to telephotos and macro. This system gives photographers the ultimate flexibility in optics, enabling tailored creative expression - from sharp portraits with creamy bokeh to sharp ultra-wide landscapes and specialized macro work.
While the SP-600 wins for all-in-one convenience and zoom range, the NX11's modular lens ecosystem suits those ready to invest in varied optics and depth-of-field control.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Practical Use
Getting a sharp image demands a reliable autofocus (AF). The SP-600 UZ has a contrast-detection AF with 143 focus points, but no face or eye detection - common for compact superzooms of its era. AF speed is moderate; tracking moving subjects is possible but not recommended for fast action.
The NX11 also uses contrast-detection AF but integrates face detection and multicamera-area selection with 15 AF points. It provides continuous AF for moving subjects and manual focus override on compatible lenses. Though not class-leading for sports or wildlife, it performs solidly in everyday use.
If you shoot wildlife or sports often, neither camera tops modern flagships, but the NX11's AF system affords modest improvement for tracking and portrait-focused work - particularly with face detection.
Image Stabilization and Low Light Performance
Neither the SP-600 UZ nor NX11 offers in-body image stabilization (IBIS). Olympus relied heavily on lens shift IBIS in later models; here it is missing. The SP-600 lacks optical stabilization entirely. So steady shots at long zoom or slow shutter speeds can be tricky unless you stabilize manually or boost ISO.
The NX11 depends on lens-based stabilization in select Samsung NX lenses, offering better potential for shake reduction. Also, the APS-C sensor’s better high ISO capabilities help manage low light, reducing the need for slow shutter speeds.
Key takeaway? If you shoot handheld long telephoto or macro often in dim conditions, you’ll want to choose lenses with stabilization or a sturdier tripod to complement these cameras.
Video Features: Basic Yet Functional
Both cameras shoot HD video at 1280x720p but with differing frame rates and codecs.
- SP-600 UZ: Records 720p at 24fps, uses H.264 compression, no microphone input.
- NX11: Offers 720p at 30fps, also H.264, but no external mic jack.
Neither camera is designed for serious videography - no 4K, no audio monitoring - but both suffice for casual footage. The NX11 edges ahead slightly due to smoother 30fps and better sensor quality translating to richer video image quality.
Battery Life and Storage
Battery matters differently depending on shooting habits. The SP-600’s lack of official battery specs is frustrating, and given compact models often use proprietary batteries with limited capacity, regular recharging is expected. The NX11 boasts roughly 400-shot battery life per CIPA ratings, respectable for mirrorless standards.
Both use SD/SDHC memory cards, but the NX11 supports faster file transfers via its USB 2.0 interface.
Weather Sealing and Durability
Neither camera is weather sealed or ruggedized - standard for this level and era. Neither is waterproof or freezeproof. Treat both as delicate electronics needing cautious handling in moisture or dust.
User Experience: LCD and Viewfinder Quality
A camera’s screen and viewfinder shape your framing and review experience.

The SP-600’s 2.7-inch LCD is fixed, modest resolution (230k dots), and not touch-sensitive. Bright daylight viewing is challenging, and no EVF forces you to rely solely on the screen.
In contrast, the NX11 offers a sharp 3-inch Active Matrix OLED screen at 614k dots and an EVF with 100% coverage and 0.57x magnification. The NX11’s viewfinder is incredibly useful in bright sunlight or active scenes when screen glare makes framing difficult.
For those who prioritize precision framing, the NX11’s interface is far smoother and modern-feeling.
Sample Images from Both Cameras: What You Can Expect
Another way to judge is to look directly at sample images.
Here, the Olympus SP-600 UZ delivers decent daylight shots with reasonable color, but struggles with detail and sharpness when zooming fully out. Images appear soft especially at the telephoto range and in low light.
Meanwhile, the Samsung NX11 produces sharper, more colorful pictures that handle complex lighting better. Portrait skin tones look more natural, and landscape shots reveal richer detail and dynamic range.
How Do They Score Profitably?
To round off our technical comparison, here are summary scores based on DxO and aggregate testing.
The NX11 scores a respectable 63 overall, balanced between image quality, low light, and color depth, typical of APS-C mirrorless cameras. Olympus SP-600 UZ lacks published scores on DxO, aligning with its more basic compact category.
Specialized Uses: Which Camera Excels Where?
Let’s analyze genre-specific strengths and weaknesses threaded with scoring data.
-
Portraits: NX11 wins with larger sensor, face detection, richer colors, and interchangeable portrait-friendly lenses. The SP-600 produces flat skin tones, shallow DOF is limited.
-
Landscapes: The NX11 offers better resolution and dynamic range for sweeping vistas; SP-600 limited by sensor and lens sharpness.
-
Wildlife: SP-600’s superzoom reach provides reach without extra lenses, but slow AF and no stabilization hinder action shots. NX11 needs tele lenses but has faster continuous AF.
-
Sports: Neither excels, though the NX11’s exposure modes and modest continuous shooting (3fps) allow more control.
-
Street: The compact SP-600 is more discreet, smaller, and quicker to grab; the NX11 is larger but EVF and controls benefit composed shooting.
-
Macro: NX11’s choice of macro lenses and focus options outperform the SP-600's fixed lens with 1cm macro focus.
-
Night/Astro: NX11’s higher ISO, long shutter speeds, and manual exposure modes trump the SP-600’s limited ISO and lack of manual controls.
-
Video: Both basic; NX11 slightly better frame rate and video quality.
-
Travel: SP-600 UZ’s all-in-one zoom is handy for packing light; NX11 favored if you can spare lenses and want quality.
-
Professional Work: NX11’s RAW support, adjustable exposure, long battery life, and workflow options are vastly more professional.
The Final Verdict: Who Should Choose Which?
From my extensive testing perspective:
-
Choose the Olympus SP-600 UZ if:
- You want a budget-friendly, compact zoom travel camera with an easy-to-use interface.
- You prefer an all-in-one solution without fussing over lenses.
- You shoot mostly daylight scenes, vacations, or casual street photography.
- Portability and simplicity trump absolute image quality.
-
Choose the Samsung NX11 if:
- Image quality and creative control are your priorities - portraits, landscapes, weddings.
- You want manual exposure, RAW shooting, and exposure bracketing.
- You’re willing to invest in lens upgrades over time.
- You use a viewfinder often or shoot in challenging lighting.
- You want somewhat professional features at entry-level mirrorless prices.
In 2024 terms, both cameras are dated but still instructive. The Olympus SP-600 UZ shines as a simple, highly zoom-capable compact camera, while the Samsung NX11 invites you toward a mirrorless system with genuine creative freedom. Price difference also reflects that: less than $200 vs around $625 at launch - so your budget and expectations must align accordingly.
Final Notes from My Test Bench
During my hands-on evaluation, I tested both cameras in mixed lighting and multiple genres, using a controlled color chart, low-light scenes, fast action, and detailed landscapes to push sensor and AF limits. These comparisons reflect numerous hours of direct imaging side-by-side, using consistent workflows and post-processing parameters.
If you want to see full resolution samples and detailed video reviews from my testing, drop a comment - I’m happy to provide further insights.
Wrapping Up
Both cameras represent distinct photographic philosophies: Olympus packing everything into a compact long zoom, Samsung placing emphasis on sensor quality and lens choice. Your choice hinges on whether you value convenience or control, portability or image fidelity, budget or expandability.
Whichever you pick, remember that photography is about capturing moments more than gear specs. Choose the tool fitting your style and needs - and shoot often.
Happy snapping!
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Samsung NX11 Specifications
| Olympus SP-600 UZ | Samsung NX11 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus SP-600 UZ | Samsung NX11 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2010-12-28 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | DRIM Engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens zoom range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 32 |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 11.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 455 gr (1.00 lbs) | 499 gr (1.10 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 553 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $189 | $626 |