Olympus SP-610UZ vs Olympus SZ-12
79 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34


89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus SP-610UZ vs Olympus SZ-12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-616mm (F3.3-5.7) lens
- 405g - 107 x 73 x 73mm
- Released January 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus SP-600 UZ
- Later Model is Olympus SP-620 UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Announced January 2012

Olympus SP-610UZ vs. SZ-12: Which Compact Superzoom Camera Comes Out Ahead in 2024?
Choosing a compact superzoom camera that balances versatility, image quality, and usability can be a challenge - especially when navigating the dizzying specs and twice-over reputation of brands like Olympus. Today, I’m diving deep into a hands-on comparison between two noteworthy Olympus offerings: the SP-610UZ, launched in early 2011, and the slightly newer SZ-12 from 2012. Both cameras target enthusiasts looking for powerful zoom ranges without sacrificing portability.
Having personally tested thousands of cameras spanning compact, mirrorless, and DSLR formats, I’ll share insights that go beyond spec sheets. From sensor performance and autofocus capabilities to ergonomics and real-world shooting across diverse photography styles, this comparison will help you decide which Olympus superzoom is the best fit for your photographic adventures.
Physical dimensions and ergonomics show the SP-610UZ is bulkier compared to the lightweight SZ-12.
First Impressions: Handling and Ergonomics
Before delving into sensor tech or autofocus nitty-gritty, the camera’s feel in hand significantly impacts your shooting comfort and efficiency.
- SP-610UZ measures 107x73x73 mm and weighs approximately 405 grams (with batteries), reflecting a boxier, heftier compact body.
- The SZ-12 is noticeably smaller and lighter at 106x69x40 mm and 226 grams with its proprietary lithium-ion battery pack.
From my hands-on experience, the SZ-12’s slim profile and reduced weight make it a much more travel-friendly companion. It easily slips into jacket pockets or small bags without weighing you down, ideal if portability is a priority.
Ergonomically, the SP-610UZ’s bulkier body provides a more substantial grip and larger control buttons, which can benefit users preferring a camera that feels “solid” and secure - especially for longer shooting sessions. However, it doesn’t offer manual control modes, limiting operational precision.
Both cameras have fixed 3-inch LCD screens (albeit with different resolutions - more on that soon) and lack electronic viewfinders, so you rely heavily on the rear screens for composing shots.
Top view shows the button placement and zoom control differences.
Control Layout and User Interface: Intuitiveness in the Field
The SP-610UZ’s control layout is straightforward yet slightly dated. Its physical zoom lever around the shutter button and several readily accessible buttons provide basic exposure control but no manual focus or exposure modes.
The SZ-12, while lacking manual exposure options as well, upgrades to a higher-resolution LCD display, which improves composition and focus assessment.
Notably, the SZ-12 adds some smart autofocus aids including face detection and continuous AF tracking systems. You’ll see the impact of this in various shooting scenarios later.
Neither camera offers touchscreen or customizable buttons, which constrains usability for those accustomed to modern camera interfaces.
Both cameras share the same 1/2.3" CCD sensor size and a 14MP resolution.
Sensor and Image Quality: More Than Meets the Eye?
At the heart of any camera is the sensor, dictating resolution, dynamic range, and low-light prowess.
Both the SP-610UZ and SZ-12 house a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor with roughly 14 megapixels resolution. This sensor size is typical for compact superzoom cameras of their era, and while it provides usable detail in bright conditions, expect compromises in dynamic range and noise performance at higher ISOs.
The SP-610UZ’s sensor maxes out at ISO 3200, whereas the SZ-12 peaks at ISO 1600 with a slightly lower native sensitivity floor.
In my testing, image quality between the two was largely comparable in good light - producing decent detail and color accuracy for snapshots and casual prints. However, the SZ-12’s processor and firmware improvements yielded better noise control and cleaner high ISO images, a subtle but welcome advantage.
Neither camera supports RAW capture, restricting post-processing flexibility - something serious enthusiasts must note.
For landscape and large prints, 14MP is sufficient but don’t expect the resolution or tonal latitude to rival larger-sensor compacts or mirrorless systems.
SZ-12’s higher resolution 3” TFT LCD provides a clearer, more detailed viewing experience than the SP-610UZ.
LCD Screens: Reviewing and Composing with Confidence
The SP-610UZ features a 230k-dot TFT LCD, which on sunny days or in shadow tends to feel a bit dim and coarse, making critical focusing and detail checking challenging.
Conversely, the SZ-12 sports a 460k-dot display, effectively doubling resolution and improving brightness and contrast. I found this enhanced viewing experience invaluable when composing tight shots or checking focus sharpness, particularly in outdoor environments where glare can be an issue.
Neither camera includes an electronic viewfinder, so those who shoot in bright conditions may find composition tricky without shading the LCD.
The Zoom Wars: Lens Performance and Reach
Superzoom cameras are often prized for versatility. Here’s how these two stack up:
Camera | Focal Length (35mm equiv.) | Max Aperture |
---|---|---|
SP-610UZ | 28-616 mm (22x zoom) | f/3.3 - f/5.7 |
SZ-12 | 25-600 mm (24x zoom) | f/3.0 - f/6.9 |
Both have fixed zoom lenses covering extensive ranges, but the SZ-12 edges slightly on the wide front (25mm vs 28mm), offering a bit more room for tight interior or group shots.
The SP-610UZ’s brighter maximum aperture across the zoom range (especially in the telephoto end) gives it a mild advantage in low-light zoomed-in photography, as it can gather more light.
Neither lens boasts image quality comparable to prime lenses; expect softness and chromatic aberrations at telephoto lengths, yet both incorporate sensor-shift image stabilization, an essential feature compensating for camera shake at those long focal lengths.
From my extensive zoom testing, the SZ-12’s lens felt a tad slower (smaller aperture), which can negatively affect autofocus speed and low-light exposure.
Autofocus: Precision and Speed in Action
This is where the SZ-12 notably outperforms the SP-610UZ.
- SP-610UZ relies solely on contrast-detection AF, offering no face detection, continuous tracking, or manual focus options. Its 11 contrast-detect AF points are fixed, and AF speed is comparatively sluggish, especially in low light or at zoomed telephoto settings.
- The SZ-12 includes face detection and continuous AF tracking features, which dramatically improve focus lock on moving subjects and portraits. It also offers multiple AF area modes compared to the SP-610UZ’s limited points and modes.
In practical terms, during my testing on moving subjects such as pets and children, the SZ-12 yielded a much higher keeper rate thanks to its predictive AF tracking and face detection.
For wildlife and sports photography enthusiasts, neither camera is designed for high-speed action, but the SZ-12’s superior AF responsiveness provides tangible benefits.
Image samples from both cameras reveal differences in sharpness, color reproduction, and zoom reach.
Real-World Shooting Across Photography Genres
Let’s break down how each camera fares in popular photography contexts.
Portrait Photography
- SP-610UZ: Limited to no face or eye detection means you must be vigilant on focusing manually, which is difficult given the contrast-based AF system. Bokeh from the zoom lens with an aperture maxing out at f/3.3 can be passable, but don’t expect creamy background separation.
- SZ-12: Face detection significantly improves portrait focusing, while continuous AF tracking helps with capturing candid expressions. However, aperture tops out at f/3.0 wide, narrowing at telephoto, so background blur remains modest.
Landscape Photography
- Both cameras’ sensors deliver moderate resolution and dynamic range typical of the class - great for casual landscape shots but limited for large prints or demanding HDR composite workflows. Neither has weather sealing; caution is advised in harsh conditions.
- SZ-12’s wider 25mm equivalent focal length aids in capturing expansive vistas.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- Neither camera is ideal for fast-action sports or wildlife due to slow frame rates (1 fps) and predictable AF. However, SZ-12’s tracking autofocus offers better results on slow moving animals or children.
- Telephoto reach is comparable - SP-610UZ's brighter aperture may aid in low light slightly.
Street Photography
- SZ-12's smaller size and weight make it more discreet for street shooting.
- Both cameras lack silent shutter modes; their telescopic lenses also produce some zoom noise.
Macro Photography
- The SP-610UZ outshines here with a minimum focusing distance of 1 cm, enabling impressive close-ups without additional accessories.
- SZ-12 doesn’t specify macro range, likely making close focusing less flexible.
Night and Astro Photography
- Both cameras rely on CCD sensors with limited high ISO use; expect noise and softness beyond ISO 400.
- No built-in long exposure or bulb modes restrict astro-friendly exposure options.
Video Capabilities
- Both record 720p HD at 30fps, but the SZ-12 records in MPEG-4/H.264 - more efficient and better quality compression than the SP-610UZ’s Motion JPEG.
- Neither offers microphone or headphone inputs; stabilization helps but video remains amateur-level.
Travel Photography
- SZ-12’s compact size and lighter weight, coupled with a wider zoom range, make it superior for travel.
- SP-610UZ’s battery system uses four AA batteries - an advantage for travelers in remote areas where rechargeables might be difficult to find. The SZ-12 uses proprietary rechargeable batteries with shorter battery life.
Professional Use
- Neither camera targets professionals.
- Lack of RAW support, limited exposure controls, and sensor size limit use in controlled studio or commercial workflows.
Performance scores reflect improvements in autofocus and image review on the SZ-12, with the SP-610UZ holding steady in zoom and macro.
Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Durability
Both are consumer-grade compact cameras without any weather sealing or ruggedness certifications. Neither is shockproof, crushproof, or freezeproof.
In repetitive handling tests, the SZ-12’s tight construction reflected modern improvements, while the SP-610UZ felt solid but a bit bulkier.
Neither camera is ideal for harsh environments.
Battery Life and Storage: Staying Powered and Ready
- SP-610UZ runs on 4 AA batteries, boasting about 340 shots per charge (reasonable for AA alkaline).
- SZ-12 uses the LI-50B rechargeable battery, rated for 220 shots per charge.
From my hands-on, AA batteries offer flexibility for travel but add weight and bulk, whereas the SZ-12’s battery life requires carrying a spare to avoid downtime.
Both cameras use a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot.
Connectivity and Additional Features
- SP-610UZ supports Eye-Fi wireless SD cards, enabling some wireless image transfer possibilities.
- SZ-12 lacks native wireless support.
- Both have USB 2.0 and HDMI outputs for image transfer and playback on TVs.
Neither includes Bluetooth, NFC, GPS, or touchscreen, limiting modern connectivity and tagging conveniences.
Price-to-Performance Ratio: What You Get for Your Money
- The Olympus SP-610UZ typically retails around $300, occasionally found at discounts below this mark.
- The Olympus SZ-12 commands a slightly higher price near $350 due to newer release date and improved features.
For hobbyists prioritizing zoom reach and macro, the SP-610UZ delivers excellent bang for buck.
For users valuing autofocus refinement, compactness, and screen quality, the SZ-12 justifies its price premium.
Breakdown by photography type shows the SZ-12’s autofocus and interface excel in portraits and street photography, while SP-610UZ scores higher in macro and telephoto zoom.
Summing It Up: Which Olympus Superzoom Should You Choose?
Who Should Buy the Olympus SP-610UZ?
- You want extensive telephoto reach (up to 616mm equivalent) with a slightly brighter lens aperture for low-light zoom shooting.
- Macro photography is important - close focus at 1 cm lets you get creative with close-ups.
- AA battery use is a plus for those in remote areas without access to chargers.
- You prefer a larger, grippier camera body.
- Budget-conscious buyers who want solid superzoom performance without cutting-edge autofocus.
Who Should Lean Towards the Olympus SZ-12?
- You prioritize portability and a lightweight design for travel and everyday carry.
- Enhanced autofocus with face detection and tracking matters for portraits, street photography, and casual moving subjects.
- Better LCD display quality improves your composition and image review experience.
- Video quality gains with H.264 compression are desired.
- You want a more modern camera with improved interface despite lack of manual controls.
Final Thoughts: My Testing Takeaway
Having evaluated these two Olympus superzooms extensively in real-world conditions - with landscapes, portraits, casual wildlife, and street shooting - the SZ-12 represents a modest evolution emphasizing usability improvements and autofocus sophistication.
That said, the SP-610UZ remains a compelling choice if you value zoom reach, macro capabilities, and longer battery life with simple AA replacements. Its image quality in good light is reliable, and the overall shooting experience is familiar to those accustomed to Olympus’s TruePic processors.
Neither camera will satisfy professionals needing manual controls, RAW shooting, or high-speed performance, but they lay a solid foundation for casual enthusiasts and beginners wanting a versatile all-in-one compact shooter.
If you want to weigh the technical pros and cons side-by-side in a nutshell:
Feature | Olympus SP-610UZ | Olympus SZ-12 |
---|---|---|
Sensor | 1/2.3” CCD, 14MP | 1/2.3” CCD, 14MP |
Max ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lens Zoom Range | 28–616mm (22x), f/3.3-5.7 | 25–600mm (24x), f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro Focus Distance | 1 cm | Not specified |
Autofocus | Contrast-detection, no face detection | Contrast-detection + face/tracking AF |
Continuous Shooting | 1 fps | 1 fps |
LCD Resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Battery | 4x AA (340 shots approx.) | Lithium-ion LI-50B (220 shots approx.) |
Video Format/Max Resolution | Motion JPEG, 720p | MPEG-4/H.264, 720p |
Weight | 405g | 226g |
Price (approximate) | $298 | $350 |
Why You Can Trust This Review
I’ve tested both cameras personally across diverse shooting styles, measuring image quality using calibrated color charts, verified autofocus speed using moving test subjects, and assessed handling over multi-hour shooting sessions. This comparison reflects practical experience beyond headline specs to help you pick the model that matches your photographic personality and needs most closely.
If you’re after a compact superzoom with decent optics and autofocus for casual photography, the Olympus SZ-12 edges ahead as the more versatile and user-friendly camera. For pure zoom reach and macro capability packaged with AA battery convenience, the SP-610UZ still holds value.
Consider how you shoot and which features matter most - you may find either Olympus camera makes a capable entry-level superzoom companion.
Happy shooting, and may your next camera bring your photographic visions to life!
Olympus SP-610UZ vs Olympus SZ-12 Specifications
Olympus SP-610UZ | Olympus SZ-12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus SP-610UZ | Olympus SZ-12 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-01-06 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-616mm (22.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.7 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1700 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.30 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 405 gr (0.89 lbs) | 226 gr (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 107 x 73 x 73mm (4.2" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 220 photographs |
Style of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $299 | $350 |