Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP3

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP3 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-330
Panasonic FP3
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP3 Overview

Below, we are matching up the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FP3, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FP3 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FP3 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-300 was released 6 years before the FP3 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FP3 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-300 scores vs the FP3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Panasonic FP3

 E-300 FP3 
Focus manually More exact focusing

Reasons to pick Panasonic FP3 over the Olympus E-300

 FP3 E-300 
IntroducedJanuary 2010January 2005Newer by 60 months
Display dimension3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution230k134kCrisper display (+96k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FP3

 E-300 FP3 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP3 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 provides physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FP3 has dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-300 versus Panasonic FP3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-300 vs the FP3.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP3 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and FP3 is 67 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP3 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions just by researching technical specs. The pic below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and FP3.

As you can tell, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic FP3 will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Panasonic FP3
48
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
28
megapixel count good (14MP)
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography factors
Panasonic FP3 Street photography factors
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes touch focus
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than average in class (155g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography factors
Panasonic FP3 Sports photography factors
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
no liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
35
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14MP)
slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic FP3 as a Travel photography camera
45
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
60
includes touch focus
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than average in class (155 grams)
does not contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FP3 as a Landscape photography camera
43
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
tiny screen (1.8")
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
missing Time Lapse recording
37
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14MP)
manual focus not available
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging highlights
Panasonic FP3 Vlogging highlights
9
lack of video recording
27
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone port
more heavy than average in class (155 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Panasonic FP3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Panasonic FP3
 Olympus E-300Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-300 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Launched 2005-01-10 2010-01-06
Body design Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip - Venus Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-5.9
Macro focusing range - 10cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 1.8" 3"
Display resolution 134 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 4.90 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 grams (1.38 lb) 155 grams (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $800 $182