Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320
Portability
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
Olympus SP-620 UZ
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Announced January 2012
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-610UZ
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Olympus TG-320, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is very comparable and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SP-620 UZ was introduced at a similar time to the TG-320 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the SP-620 UZ grades against the TG-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-620 UZ and Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus TG-320
| SP-620 UZ | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
| TG-320 | SP-620 UZ |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Olympus TG-320
| SP-620 UZ | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | January 2012 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-620 UZ enjoys external measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Olympus TG-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the SP-620 UZ compared to the TG-320.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-620 UZ and TG-320 is 78 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-620 UZ and TG-320.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus SP-620 UZ to provide extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a little more aggressively.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus SP-620 UZ Portrait photography details
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography details
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
features face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
features face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Olympus SP-620 UZ Street photography advice
Olympus TG-320 Street photography advice
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
lighter than competition in class (155g)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Olympus SP-620 UZ Sports photography advice
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography advice
excellent zoom range (25-525mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
weather proof
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (150 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Olympus SP-620 UZ Travel photography info
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography info
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
great reach (525mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
lighter than competition in class (155g)
weather proof
megapixel count good (14MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse function
terrible battery pack (150 per charge)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Olympus SP-620 UZ Landscape photography factors
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography factors
pretty wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
does not have Timelapse mode
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
weather proof
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
terrible battery pack (150 CIPA)
missing Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-620 UZ Vlogging information
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging information
pretty wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone port
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Olympus SP-620 UZ | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SP-620 UZ | Olympus TG-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-525mm (21.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.8 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $199 | $0 |