Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e15b/5e15bbd13d20cd8ec38f10fc405eeba9ee72db5a" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ front Olympus SP-620 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Announced January 2012
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Olympus TG-320, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is very comparable and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SP-620 UZ was introduced at a similar time to the TG-320 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the SP-620 UZ grades against the TG-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-620 UZ and Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus TG-320
SP-620 UZ | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
TG-320 | SP-620 UZ |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Olympus TG-320
SP-620 UZ | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2012 | Same generation |
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-620 UZ enjoys external measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Olympus TG-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the SP-620 UZ compared to the TG-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc058/dc058a329840ed0cc8f0372cea80d2fa6a4c1aab" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-620 UZ and TG-320 is 78 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d214/5d214f85d7516304e82f8c1933d53b37432ec7dd" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-620 UZ and TG-320.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus SP-620 UZ to provide extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a little more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cb74/6cb74679f67174361b259594b961527a607773be" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a98a0/a98a0e7f1760f195f2c9a588ee495a079fb69b3d" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Olympus SP-620 UZ | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus SP-620 UZ | Olympus TG-320 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-525mm (21.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.8 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 150 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $199 | $0 |