Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Panasonic Lumix GF7: A Thorough Hands-On Comparison for the Discerning Photographer

Choosing the right camera often feels like a riddle wrapped in an enigma, wrapped in a marketing brochure promising the moon. Having spent over 15 years in the trenches testing hundreds of cameras - from basic point-and-shoots to professional workhorses - I’m here to cut through the jargon and help you decide between two intriguing options from different corners of the camera universe: the Olympus SP-620 UZ and the Panasonic Lumix GF7. Both offer unique propositions, yet target somewhat different users, so it’s not a simple apples-to-apples battle. Let’s unpack these cameras layer by layer.

Olympus SP-620 UZ (left) and Panasonic GF7 (right) - Size and Ergonomics Compared

Setting the Stage: What Are We Looking At?

The Olympus SP-620 UZ (announced in early 2012) is a small sensor superzoom compact designed for enthusiasts who want an all-in-one travel buddy with a massive zoom range, modest technical sophistication, and straightforward ease of use. It sticks to a fixed lens, no manual focus, and an affordable price tag around $200 at launch.

In contrast, the Panasonic GF7 (a 2015 entry-level mirrorless) offers interchangeable lens flexibility using the Micro Four Thirds system - a big step up in image quality potential, creative control, and customization. Price-wise, it sits around $300, appealing to newer photographers looking to step into the mirrorless realm without breaking the bank.

Given this, our comparison will traverse various photography genres and technical facets to reveal which camera shines under which circumstances - and, importantly, which one fits your style and wallet.

Physical Feel and Controls: Holding Each Camera Tells You a Story

Just by holding each camera you get a good whiff of their DNA. The Olympus sprawls a bit, partly due to its extensive zoom optical assembly and battery requirements (4 AA batteries). It feels a bit chunky and heavier at 435g, but not unfair for a compact with a 21x zoom lens (25-525mm equivalent). The grip is decent, but the plastic body and lack of weather sealing mean it’s best treated gently.

Top view: Olympus SP-620 UZ (left) vs Panasonic GF7 (right) - Control layouts and ergonomics

The Panasonic GF7, conversely, oozes minimalist charm with a compact, almost toy-like frame at 266g and a slim 33mm depth. Its rangefinder-style shape is more aligned with modern mirrorless, placing controls tactically for beginners yet offering manual exposure dials, aperture priority, shutter priority - all the goodies for learning and growth. The tilting touchscreen adds a layer of convenience for composing shots at unconventional angles.

While the Olympus’s fixed LCD is a standard 3" with paltry 230k dots, the Panasonic packs a stunning 1040k resolution screen with touch support - hugely beneficial in both bright sunlight and challenging angles.

Back screen quality and interface: SP-620 UZ’s simple TFT LCD vs GF7’s bright, tilting touchscreen

In terms of interfaces, the GF7’s focus on customization, exposure bracketing, and manual control is a dream for photographers ready to dive deeper, while the SP-620 UZ keeps things simple and automated, appealing to casual users or those who want point-and-shoot convenience.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Here’s where the waters get clearer and a bit unsurprising. The Olympus SP-620 uses a 1/2.3” CCD sensor, which - although boasting 16 megapixels - is physically tiny at just 6.17 x 4.55 mm. The Panasonic GF7 employs a much larger Micro Four Thirds CMOS sensor (17.3 x 13 mm) also delivering 16 MP but with fundamentally better light-gathering capability and dynamic range.

Sensor size and specs - Micro Four Thirds sensor (Panasonic GF7) vastly eclipses small 1/2.3" CCD (Olympus SP-620 UZ)

From my experience, small sensors such as Olympus’s 1/2.3” type typically struggle with noise at ISO levels above 400, and dynamic range is constrained. This means highlights clip easily, shadows lose detail, and low-light image degradation is significant. Conversely, the GF7’s larger sensor allows for cleaner images with richer color depth, better highlight and shadow retention, and usable ISO sensitivity up to 3200 or beyond - hugely important across genres like portraits and night shooting.

In practical terms, this manifests in portraits where the Panasonic is better at preserving natural skin tones and reducing noise, versus the Olympus which can produce noisier, less gentle results especially indoors or in shade.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Following the Action

Autofocus lives or dies by its speed and accuracy, and here the species diverge sharply. The Olympus SP-620’s contrast-detection AF system is quite basic - single AF mode without continuous autofocus, no manual focus, and a limited ability in tracking subjects. It claims face detection but no eye or animal recognition.

The Panasonic GF7 steps it up with a more sophisticated contrast detection AF, boasting 23 focus points, touch AF, continuous AF for moving subjects, and expanded face detection. From hands-on experience, the GF7’s autofocus is faster and more reliable for still and live subject photography, including street and casual wildlife.

Burst shooting is another important factor: The GF7 delivers a decent 5.8 frames per second (fps), suitable for casual sports and action shots. The SP-620 UZ doesn’t advertise a burst rate, and in practice, it’s noticeably slower - unsuited for fast-paced shooting.

Lens Flexibility: Fixed Superzoom or Interchangeable Versatility?

One big philosophical difference is lens strategy. The Olympus SP-620 UZ sports a remarkable fixed 25-525mm equivalent zoom, covering wide-angle landscapes to distanced wildlife effortlessly without changing lenses. For travel or casual wildlife spotting, this is magical - one camera, one lens, no fuss.

However, the optical design is a tradeoff: maximum aperture narrows from F3.1 wide open to a skimpier F5.8 telephoto, limiting low-light performance and creative bokeh at the long end. Plus, the depth of field won’t be as beautifully shallow as larger sensor cameras.

The Panasonic GF7, with its Micro Four Thirds mount, opens a treasure chest of over 100 native lenses, from primes with buttery bokeh to specialist macros and ultra-fast zooms. This means - should your budget allow - you can build a system tailored precisely to your photography needs: portraits, architecture, macro, astrophotography, you name it.

Portrait Photography: Who Gets the Glow Without the Glare?

If you’re chasing portraits, skin tone rendition and bokeh quality are among the most critical factors. The Olympus’s small sensor and fixed lens mean shallow depth-of-field effects are limited; background blur is more simulated than real. It’s good enough for casual portraits but lacks that creamy, dreamy rendering that photographers prize.

The Panasonic GF7, aided by its larger sensor and lens choices, excels here. Using a fast prime lens like the Panasonic 25mm f/1.7 (equiv. 50mm FOV), portraits become richer with natural, smooth bokeh, nice subject separation, and true-to-life skin tones. Face detection autofocus works well, locking on eyes to keep them crisply in focus.

Landscape Photography: Seeking Resolution, Range, and Weather Sense

Landscape photographers prize high resolution, wide dynamic range, rugged build to face the elements, and preferably a wide-angle lens.

Resolution-wise, both produce around 16 MP images at similar dimensions (~4600 x 3400), but the GF7’s sensor size means better detail preservation in shadows and highlights - vital for sweeping natural scenes. The Olympus’s smaller sensor struggles with highlight clipping and loses texture in dark areas.

Neither offers weather sealing out of the box, so if you shoot in rough weather often, you’ll want additional protection regardless.

For wide-angle capability, the Olympus starts at a decent 25 mm equivalent - useful for sweeping vistas. The Panasonic’s advantage is again in interchangeable lenses - available ultra-wide options (like 7-14mm F4) can easily broaden horizons.

Wildlife Photography: Zoom, Autofocus, and Act Fast

The Olympus SP-620 UZ really comes into its own for casual wildlife hunting, thanks to that enormous 21x zoom. Spotting birds or distant critters is a breeze without lugging heavy telephoto glass. However, autofocus speed, tracking, and burst shooting capabilities aren’t designed for serious action.

The Panasonic GF7’s lack of built-in stabilization and no native super telephotos in the box mean you’ll need to invest in lenses above 200mm to approximate this reach - which gets costly and heavy. On the flip side, its quicker burst rate and better autofocus tracking empower you when animals are on the move, improving keeper rates.

Sports Photography: Tracking Fast and Furious

Here, the Panasonic GF7 again has the upper hand. Despite not being a sports-specialist body, its 5.8 fps burst shooting and continuous AF make it the better choice over the Olympus, which neither specifies nor performs well with fast sequences due to slower focusing and image processing.

However, it still won’t compete with professional DSLRs or high-end mirrorless sports cameras - the GF7 is more of a beginner-to-enthusiast step.

Street Photography: Discreet, Swift, and Low Light Savvy

When sneaking through corners, the GF7’s compactness and silent shutter (though electronic shutter is not specified) plus touch AF make for a nimble companion. Its tilting screen helps with candid angles. Meanwhile, the Olympus’s zoom lens makes it less discreet - you'd know if you’re trying to go incognito.

Low-light street photography is strongly in Panasonic’s favor thanks to higher ISO capabilities and cleaner performance.

Macro Photography: Precision Close-Ups

Oddly, the Olympus claims an impressive 1 cm macro focus - great for super close-ups of flowers and insects without adding accessories. The fixed lens with optical stabilization helps here.

The Panasonic GF7’s macro abilities rely on the lens attached, which can be phenomenal if you invest in a dedicated macro lens, but out of the box macro isn’t specifically optimized.

Night and Astrophotography: Noise and Exposure Control

In low-light or dark-sky photography, sensor size, maximum ISO, long shutter support, and bracketing matter.

The Olympus’s max shutter speed is 15 seconds, slow enough for some star trails, but ISO tops at 3200 with noisy images and limited exposure control. No RAW is a big limitation here - editing options are slim.

The Panasonic GF7 features 1/60 to 1/16000 shutter range, ISO sensitivity up to 25600, and importantly, RAW support allowing sophisticated post-processing - critical for astrophotography enthusiasts. Exposure bracketing is present, mitigating dynamic range limitations in night scenes.

Video Capabilities: Are They Cinema-Ready?

Video is often an afterthought on casual cameras but important for vloggers and multimedia pros.

Olympus shoots 720p HD video at 30 fps - a respectable feature for its time, but by 2024 standards, lacking. Also, no microphone input and limited frame rate options mean less creativity.

Panasonic GF7 supports 1080p full HD at multiple frame rates, including 60p - perfect for smooth slow-motion, with in-body stabilization missing but compensated by lens-based systems and high-performance processor. No external mic input lowers audio quality options, a fair tradeoff in this entry-level class.

Battery and Storage: How Long Do They Last on the Road?

Olympus runs on four AA batteries - a great perk for replacing power anywhere but heavy and inefficient. Battery life ratings are absent but expect moderate endurance.

Panasonic GF7 uses a proprietary lithium-ion battery rated for about 230 shots per charge - not stellar by modern mirrorless standards but adequate for day hikes or casual shoots. Both accept SD cards (SDHC/SDXC).

Connectivity and Extras: Wireless and Workflow Ease

The Olympus’s only wireless hint is Eye-Fi card support - basically, compatibility with Wi-Fi-enabled SD cards to transfer images wirelessly.

The Panasonic GF7 boasts built-in Wi-Fi and NFC, streamlining image transfer and remote control via smartphone apps - a huge bonus for social shooters and travel photographers.

Build Quality and Durability

Neither camera is weather sealed or ruggedized. Both rely on careful handling - but the Panasonic’s more compact and lighter build may tempt you to carry it everywhere, increasing opportunities at the cost of potential fragility.

Overall Performance and Scores

Sample Gallery: Real-Life Images Speak Volumes

Olympus SP 620 UZ front Olympus SP 620 UZ screen back Panasonic GF7 front Panasonic GF7 screen back

The Olympus, even at full zoom, produces decent detail but with noticeable softness around edges and more chromatic aberration. The Panasonic’s portraits and landscapes showcase richer colors, cleaner shadows, and more natural bokeh.

Wrapping Up: Which Camera Should You Pick?

My personal take? If you thirst for versatility and want a system that grows with your ambition - plus vastly superior image quality - the Panasonic GF7 is your best bet. It won’t replace professional gear, but it bridges casual shooting to enthusiast levels beautifully. The touchscreen, burst shooting, and Wi-Fi make daily shooting and sharing enjoyable.

On the other hand, if your primary goal is an uncomplicated superzoom compact with a massive zoom range for casual travel, family events, or snapping wildlife afar without fuss, the Olympus SP-620 UZ remains a reasonable pick on a tight budget. Just temper expectations about noise and image quality.

Final Thoughts: Matching Camera to Your Photography Life

Choosing a camera is inevitably about matching needs rather than pure specs. Are you:

• An occasional shooter wanting a “point-and-zoom” all-in-one? Olympus.
• A budding enthusiast craving creative flexibility and image quality? Panasonic.
• A traveler who values pocketability and zoom? Olympus.
• Someone ready to explore manual modes and expand a lens collection? Panasonic.

Neither camera answers all demands perfectly, but both carve niches that still hold relevance in 2024’s camera landscape.

Hopefully this deep dive helps you avoid buyer’s remorse and target the camera genuinely suited to your style. Remember - as I’ve learned after countless camera trials - the best camera is ultimately the one you enjoy using consistently. And if you want my advice about lenses, accessories, or workflow options for the GF7 or similar mirrorless systems, just shout. Happy shooting!

End of Article