Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Olympus SP-810 UZ front
Portability
78
Imaging
37
Features
34
Overall
35

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
  • 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Old Model is Olympus SP-800 UZ
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Overview

Here, we are comparing the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SP-810 UZ (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SP-810 UZ (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The E-M1 II was revealed 5 years after the SP-810 UZ which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-M1 II matches up against the SP-810 UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus SP-810 UZ

 E-M1 II SP-810 UZ 
AnnouncedSeptember 2016July 2011More modern by 63 months
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k230kCrisper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Olympus E-M1 II

 SP-810 UZ E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SP-810 UZ

 E-M1 II SP-810 UZ 
Display size3"3"Same display measurement

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus SP-810 UZ has dimensions of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II versus the SP-810 UZ.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and SP-810 UZ is 68 and 78 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Sensor Comparison

Often, it is hard to see the difference between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The picture underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and SP-810 UZ.

As you can tell, the two cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II having a larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will resolve extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography info
Olympus SP-810 UZ Portrait photography info
76
focusing manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focus
exports RAW formats
33
megapixel count decent (14MP)
supports face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography information
Olympus SP-810 UZ Street photography information
78
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
offers focus by touch
environment proofing
lighter than average (574g)
above average ISO range (25,600)
50
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography highlights
Olympus SP-810 UZ Sports photography highlights
75
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
high frames per second (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
environment proofing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
not so great battery power (350 shots)
40
amazing zoom range (24-864mm 36.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,200s)
max frames per second very slow (0.7 fps)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography info
Olympus SP-810 UZ Travel photography info
72
lighter than average (574g)
environment proofing
offers focus by touch
good resolution (20MP)
selfie friendly display
not so great battery power (350 CIPA)
61
megapixel count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (864mm)
missing Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography advice
Olympus SP-810 UZ Landscape photography advice
76
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
does not have anti aliasing filter
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
environment proofing
two card slots
not so great battery power (350 CIPA)
40
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 II
Vlogging with Olympus SP-810 UZ
79
selfie friendly display
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
includes microphone socket
lighter than average (574g)
27
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SP-810 UZ
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIOlympus SP-810 UZ
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Olympus SP-810 UZ
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2016-09-19 2011-07-27
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW format
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-864mm (36.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.9-5.7
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 1/4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000s 1/1200s
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0fps 0.7fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 6.20 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video file format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lb) 413 grams (0.91 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Dual Single
Launch price $1,700 $280