Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Sony A390
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e15b/5e15bbd13d20cd8ec38f10fc405eeba9ee72db5a" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ front Olympus SP-620 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc9a0/cc9a0ca2125609e674d299e5b8108d0775ff4eee" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Announced January 2012
- Replaced the Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Launched July 2010
- Old Model is Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Sony A390 Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus SP-620 UZ versus Sony A390, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the A390 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The SP-620 UZ was brought out 18 months after the A390 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-620 UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the SP-620 UZ matches up vs the A390 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Sony A390 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-620 UZ & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Sony A390
SP-620 UZ | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | July 2010 | More modern by 18 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
A390 | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Sony A390
SP-620 UZ | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus SP-620 UZ has external dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-620 UZ versus Sony A390 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the SP-620 UZ compared to the A390.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4715d/4715d9588e6b4c2a092eff394cfaee98a0b8db6c" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Sony A390 size comparison Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Sony A390 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-620 UZ and A390 is 78 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23c47/23c479ba1d690ff83f576d3888f7d78aeb99f357" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizes just by checking a spec sheet. The image below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-620 UZ and A390.
As you can see, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The SP-620 UZ featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus SP-620 UZ will give more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher SP-620 UZ should have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efb52/efb520c516d9ce35d1f72c84b7ba4bee7255bbe9" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a403/7a403477f9f712bf5c2ce135b7cdbd656f2caeca" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus SP-620 UZ | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus SP-620 UZ | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2010-07-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 25-525mm (21.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.8 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) | 549 gr (1.21 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $199 | $500 |