Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Pentax Optio RZ18: A Deep Dive into Compact Superzoom Performance

As an experienced photography professional who has tested hundreds of cameras across genres and price points, I often get questions about choosing reliable compact superzoom cameras that blend long reach with convenience. Today, I’m dissecting two intriguing contenders from the early 2010s: the Olympus SP-800 UZ and the Pentax Optio RZ18. These models reflect distinct design philosophies and practical compromises that influenced their performance and usability. In this comprehensive comparison, I’ll rely on my extensive hands-on testing and detailed technical analysis to help you understand how these cameras perform in various shooting scenarios and who each suits best.

Let’s start by setting the stage with an overview of their physical design, then move into sensor and image quality, autofocus systems, shooting versatility, and finally real-world usability - including video and travel considerations. Wherever relevant, I’ll include side-by-side image samples, technical charts, and practical insights.

First Impressions: Handling and Physical Design

When I first held both cameras, I immediately noticed how physically different they felt despite targeting the same “compact superzoom” category.

The Olympus SP-800 UZ weighs 455 grams and measures roughly 110×90×91 mm. Its body has a chunky, grippy build that suggests robust handling, especially when zooming in at the long 840mm equivalent focal length. The rubberized grip and solid electronic zoom rocker provide reassuring control. However, the camera’s large depth and bulk can make it less discreet during street shooting or travel days where pack space is limited.

The Pentax Optio RZ18, by contrast, sports a far more pocketable design, measuring just 97×61×33 mm and tipping the scales at a mere 178 grams. It’s noticeably slimmer and lighter, making it an alluring companion for casual outings and urban strolls. The slim profile and minimal heft translate to excellent portability but at the expense of a slightly shorter zoom range and less substantial ergonomics. Its flat surfaces mean you’ll likely rely more on a wrist strap to avoid accidental slips.

Both cameras use fixed lenses with significant zoom range versatility, but their handling nuances will appeal to different styles. I personally prefer the physical assurance of the Olympus when zoomed telephoto, while the Pentax RZ18 feels more spontaneous and nimble.

Control Layout and User Interface: Practicality in Your Hands

Examining the top control layout offers clues about each camera’s usability during fast-moving shoots.

The SP-800 UZ features a straightforward top-panel with a mode dial, zoom rocker, shutter button, and a playback switch. The buttons are well spaced, backed by tactile feedback even without illumination - a big plus in difficult light conditions. The absence of manual focus and exposure modes limits creative control but keeps operation simple. Unfortunately, some basic functions like exposure compensation are missing, which I found frustrating in challenging lighting.

The Pentax RZ18 sports similarly minimal physical controls but stands out with a modestly improved rear button cluster - allowing selective AF area targeting and custom white balance toggling. Its menu system is intuitive, while the fixed 3-inch display has anti-reflective coating that enhances visibility outdoors.

In day-to-day use, the Olympus offers more solid ergonomics, but the Pentax edges ahead with subtle menu advantages - though neither model targets advanced shooters craving full manual override.

Sensor Architecture and Image Quality Considerations

At the heart of any camera’s imaging potential lies its sensor. Both cameras use a 1/2.3” CCD sensor, common in compact superzoom designs of their era, but their implementations differ in resolution and processing.

• Olympus SP-800 UZ: 14MP, sensor area ~28.07 mm²
• Pentax Optio RZ18: 16MP, sensor area ~27.72 mm²

The Pentax has a marginal resolution advantage with 16 megapixels, capturing images up to 4608×3456 pixels versus the Olympus’s 4288×3216. On paper, this suggests potential for finer detail, but the reality is nuanced. The CCD technology, though capable of impressive dynamic range for its size, is generally limited at higher ISOs. Neither camera supports RAW capture, which constrains post-processing flexibility.

In my controlled tests shooting natural scenes, the Pentax images display slightly better fine detail rendition and less aggressive noise reduction. Meanwhile, Olympus’s color science impresses with pleasant skin tones and more vibrant greens straight from camera - qualities I appreciate especially in portrait and landscape photography where nuance matters.

At their base ISOs (64 for Olympus, 80 for Pentax), both deliver excellent dynamic range within the sensor limitations. However, in low light, noise becomes prominent above ISO 400 on the Pentax and even earlier on the Olympus, so it pays to keep ISO low or use stabilization.

Viewing Experience: LCD and Composition Tools

Neither camera has an electronic viewfinder, so the LCD screens become critical for composing and reviewing shots.

The Olympus’s 3-inch, fixed 230k-dot LCD is serviceable though quite dim under direct sunlight. This tends to make framing tricky outdoors, especially at longer zooms. The screen lacks touchscreen capability or articulating mechanism, limiting shooting angles.

Conversely, the Pentax’s 3-inch screen boasts double the resolution at 460k dots and includes anti-reflective coating, making it significantly easier to use in bright environments. Although fixed too, its superior brightness and contrast considerably improve live view accuracy, especially important for critical manual focusing and macro compositions.

Neither offers a viewfinder, so both require shooting via the LCD. I found the Pentax screen’s clarity a more pleasant experience day-to-day.

Autofocus Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Versatility

Autofocus is a decisive factor in capturing decisive moments, especially in fast-paced, dynamic environments.

Both cameras utilize contrast-detection AF systems typical of compact superzooms, lacking phase-detection or hybrid modules. However, their AF implementations diverge.

• Olympus SP-800 UZ: 143 focus points, contrast detection, no manual focus.
• Pentax Optio RZ18: 9 focus points, contrast detection, manual focus available.

Interestingly, despite fewer AF points, the Pentax RZ18 offers selective AF targeting and manual focus ring control, allowing precise focus on unconventional subjects like macro flowers or street details. The Olympus's broader AF coverage enables a bit more tracking flexibility but at times, I noticed hunting in low-contrast scenes. Both cameras offer face/eye detection absence, which is a downside for portrait fast-focus.

Continuous AF isn’t supported on either, and burst shooting differs drastically: Olympus manages up to 10 fps at low resolution, good for action bursts, while Pentax is limited to 1 fps, reducing utility for sports or wildlife.

In wildlife and sports testing, Olympus’s faster burst benefit combined with steadier zoom handling offered more keeper frames. Pentax’s focus accuracy shines better in deliberate portrait or macro shooting where focus precision trumps speed.

Lens Range and Aperture: Versatility for Many Situations

Zoom range creates the foundation for any superzoom’s promise: capturing everything from wide landscapes to distant wildlife.

The Olympus SP-800 UZ boasts a massive 28-840mm equivalent (30x zoom) with a bright F2.8-5.6 aperture range. Examined critically, this focal length versatility is impressive for a compact and means you can carry one camera for varied scenarios, from wide-angle landscapes to far-off sports or wildlife subjects.

The Pentax Optio RZ18 offers a more modest 25-450mm equivalent (18x zoom) with a slower F3.5-5.9 aperture. While its shortest focal length is slightly wider, the telephoto reach is nearly halved compared to Olympus. The narrower aperture reduces low light capability, impacting indoor or crepuscular wildlife shooting where faster lenses help.

That said, Pentax’s lens is reputed for good sharpness throughout the zoom range, with less distortion and chromatic aberration. The Olympus lens, while longer, exhibits more softness and noticeable vignetting at the longest focal lengths.

If your photography frequently demands extreme telephoto reach, Olympus is the clear choice. For everyday versatility with improved optical quality, Pentax offers a compelling balance.

Macro Capabilities: Close-Up Details with Precision

Macro photography often requires precise focusing and close minimum focusing distances.

• Olympus SP-800 UZ: Macro focus from 1 cm.
• Pentax Optio RZ18: Macro focus from 4 cm.

The Olympus enables remarkably close focusing distances, allowing intimate compositions with fine detail capture when combined with its bright aperture at wide angle. The Pentax macro range is less aggressive but benefits from manual focus control, providing greater precision at 4 cm.

I found Olympus better for spontaneous close nature shots, especially handheld, while Pentax excels in controlled setups where I have time to adjust focus manually.

Shooting Speed and Burst Rates

In scenarios like wildlife or sports, frame rate impacts your ability to capture the perfect moment.

The Olympus impresses with a burst rate of 10 fps, albeit likely at a reduced image size or with some buffer limitations. The Pentax lags behind with a 1 fps continuous shooting performance, not ideal for action but fine for static subjects.

This advantage gives Olympus the edge for wildlife and fast-paced events, though image buffer and focus speed still impose practical limits.

Video Capabilities: Quality and Usability in Motion

Neither camera targets videographers, but casual video recording is increasingly important.

• Olympus SP-800 UZ: 720p at 30 fps, H.264 compression, HDMI output.
• Pentax Optio RZ18: 720p at 30 and 15 fps, Motion JPEG codec, no HDMI.

The Olympus delivers smoother recording with better codec efficiency and external HDMI, helpful if you want to monitor video or do light editing. The Pentax’s Motion JPEG format results in larger file sizes and fewer frame rate options. Neither camera includes microphone or headphone jacks, limiting audio control.

Neither provides advanced video features like 4K, image stabilization during video beyond sensor-shift still image, or slow motion. For casual home movies or travel clips, Olympus represents a better overall experience.

Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Durability for Outdoor Use

Reputation matters when evaluating compact superzooms for rugged shooting environments.

The Olympus SP-800 UZ lacks environmental sealing, dustproofing, or weatherproofing features. It’s a typical compact more appropriate for mild conditions.

The Pentax Optio RZ18, interestingly, comes with environmental sealing, an unusual trait in this category. This provides some peace of mind when shooting in light rain or dusty landscapes.

If you frequently photograph outdoors or travel to challenging locations, the Pentax’s sealed body offers a key advantage in reliability.

Battery Life and Storage

Both cameras use proprietary lithium-ion batteries with approximate parity in stamina. Neither provides official CIPA ratings, but typical real-world usage experiments suggest:

• Olympus: Moderate battery life due to large LCD and frequent zoom use.
• Pentax: Longer usage possible due to lower power draw and lightweight design.

Storage options include SD/SDHC cards, with Pentax also supporting SDXC, advantageous if shooting many images or longer videos.

Connectivity and Extras

Connectivity is minimal on both.

• Olympus: USB 2.0 and HDMI output.
• Pentax: USB 2.0 and Eye-Fi card compatibility for wireless image transfer.

The Eye-Fi support on Pentax is a nice bonus for enthusiasts wanting effortless photo sharing without cables.

Image Samples: Visual Comparison Under Varying Conditions

Olympus SP 800 UZ front Olympus SP 800 UZ screen back Pentax RZ18 front Pentax RZ18 screen back

Examining real-world image galleries, Olympus images reveal punchier colors, wider telephoto reach, and effective image stabilization. Pentax photos present cleaner detail at base ISO with less flare and distortion, notable in landscape shots, but zooming in beyond 300mm reveals limitations.

Portraits from Olympus benefit from smoother bokeh at wider apertures, though Pentax’s skin tones appear more natural due to refined color balance.

Overall Performance and Ratings Summary

In cumulative testing metrics, Olympus scores higher in burst shooting, zoom reach, and video capabilities. Pentax excels in sensor resolution, build quality, and screen usability.

Genre-Specific Strengths: Who Shines Where?

• Portrait: Olympus edges out with brighter lens and better bokeh but Pentax’s manual focus and natural skin tones are notable.
• Landscape: Pentax scores higher owing to sharper optics and anti-reflective LCD.
• Wildlife: Olympus dominates with longer zoom and faster burst.
• Sports: Olympus is suitable due to autofocus coverage and frame rate.
• Street: Pentax lightness and discretion appeal.
• Macro: Olympus’s close focusing distance and stabilization help.
• Night/Astro: Neither excels but Pentax’s higher ISO ceiling is marginally helpful.
• Video: Olympus is the better choice.
• Travel: Pentax’s sealed compactness and weight trump for carry-all-day ease.
• Professional Use: Neither provide RAW or advanced controls, but Pentax’s build and file quality are marginally preferable for casual pro backup.

Final Thoughts: Which Should You Choose?

My testing reveals that both cameras offer compelling features for enthusiasts seeking compact superzoom versatility - yet your priorities dictate the best fit:

Choose the Olympus SP-800 UZ if you want:

• Maximum zoom reach (up to 840mm)
• Faster continuous shooting for action
• More robust ergonomics for telephoto shooting
• Slightly better video capability
• Smoother bokeh and vibrant colors in portrait and wildlife

Choose the Pentax Optio RZ18 if you want:

• A highly compact, travel-friendly form factor
• Superior screen visibility in bright conditions
• Environmental sealing for outdoor durability
• Higher sensor resolution for landscapes and detail work
• Manual focus control for precise macro and selective focus
• Wireless image transfer convenience

Neither will satisfy advanced photographic workflows as they lack RAW support and manual exposure modes. They are best suited as capable point-and-shoot alternatives with superzoom strengths, each carving out its niche.

For casual wildlife or sports photography, Olympus’s longer zoom and shooting speed will likely deliver more keepers. For travel and street shooters valuing portability and durability, Pentax is a pragmatic, lightweight companion.

I hope this detailed hands-on comparison helps you decide with confidence. Having tested both thoroughly, I find they represent thoughtful compromises in design and performance, reflective of their time. For modern buyers, I recommend considering them alongside newer models but if a budget superzoom compact is your goal, either could serve well depending on your preferred balance of zoom, size, and handling.

Feel free to reach out with any questions - I’m always happy to discuss camera choices and testing insights from my 15+ years behind the lens.

Happy shooting!

Images used in this article:

• 
• 
• 
• 
• Olympus SP 800 UZ front Olympus SP 800 UZ screen back Pentax RZ18 front Pentax RZ18 screen back