Clicky

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS

Portability
69
Imaging
36
Features
35
Overall
35
Olympus SP-800 UZ front
 
Ricoh WG-4 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs

Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 1000)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2010
  • Updated by Olympus SP-810 UZ
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Released February 2014
  • New Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview

Following is a thorough overview of the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The SP-800 UZ was revealed 5 years before the WG-4 GPS which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the SP-800 UZ grades vs the WG-4 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 SP-800 UZ WG-4 GPS 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus SP-800 UZ

 WG-4 GPS SP-800 UZ 
ReleasedFebruary 2014February 2010More modern by 48 months
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 SP-800 UZ WG-4 GPS 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-800 UZ offers physical measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).

Check the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the SP-800 UZ compared to the WG-4 GPS.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and WG-4 GPS is 69 and 90 respectively.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The pic here may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-800 UZ and WG-4 GPS.

Clearly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to show more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus SP-800 UZ
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
28
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
41
you can focus manually
decent MP (16MP)
features face detect focusing
manual mode not available
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ Street photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography factors
46
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
59
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than competition in class (235 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Sports photography camera
46
incredible zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
45
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
environment proof
slow frames per second (2.0 fps)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery (240 per charge)
no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus SP-800 UZ
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
61
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
long reach (840mm)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
69
environment proof
decent MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery (240 shots)
heavier than competition in class (235 grams)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Landscape photography camera
41
rather wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
54
you can focus manually
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
environment proof
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not available
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
terrible battery (240 per charge)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-800 UZ Vlogging features
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Vlogging features
24
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone support
34
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no mic jack
heavier than competition in class (235g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-800 UZ and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
 Olympus SP-800 UZRicoh WG-4 GPS
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus SP-800 UZ Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Announced 2010-02-02 2014-02-05
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Max boosted ISO 1000 -
Minimum native ISO 64 125
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 143 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-840mm (30.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.6 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 12 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.10 m 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 455 grams (1.00 pounds) 235 grams (0.52 pounds)
Physical dimensions 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 images
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-50B D-LI92
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $270 $210