Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 II
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
58 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Introduced June 2015
- Previous Model is Sony RX10
- Updated by Sony RX10 III
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 II Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Sony RX10 II, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and RX10 II (20MP) and the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and RX10 II (1") come with different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SP-800 UZ was released 6 years before the RX10 II which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the SP-800 UZ matches up vs the RX10 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Sony RX10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Sony RX10 II
SP-800 UZ | RX10 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 II over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
RX10 II | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2015 | February 2010 | Newer by 65 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 230k | Clearer screen (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony RX10 II
SP-800 UZ | RX10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 II Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-800 UZ has got external dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 II has measurements of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") having a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Sony RX10 II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the SP-800 UZ compared to the RX10 II.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-800 UZ and RX10 II is 69 and 58 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 II Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by going over specifications. The image underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-800 UZ and RX10 II.
Plainly, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SP-800 UZ because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF harder and the Sony RX10 II will offer more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 II Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2015-06-10 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1000 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 12s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | 14.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 10.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 455 grams (1.00 lb) | 813 grams (1.79 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 531 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $270 | $998 |