Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 IV
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Renewed by Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Released September 2017
- Succeeded the Sony RX10 III
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 IV Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 IV, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and RX10 IV (20MP) and the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and RX10 IV (1") provide different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SP-800 UZ was introduced 8 years earlier than the RX10 IV and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the SP-800 UZ scores vs the RX10 IV when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 IV Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Sony RX10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Sony RX10 IV
SP-800 UZ | RX10 IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
RX10 IV | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2017 | February 2010 | Fresher by 92 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1440k | 230k | Crisper screen (+1210k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony RX10 IV
SP-800 UZ | RX10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-800 UZ comes with outside measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 IV has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") having a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 IV in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the SP-800 UZ vs the RX10 IV.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and RX10 IV is 69 and 52 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-800 UZ and RX10 IV.
To sum up, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SP-800 UZ having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony RX10 IV will result in greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older SP-800 UZ will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2017-09-12 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1000 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,440k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 12 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 24.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455 gr (1.00 pounds) | 1095 gr (2.41 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $270 | $1,698 |