Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony TX200V
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91d06/91d06e64750ff9ea247ef7d29955562c9a21441b" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front"
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Replacement is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony TX200V Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony TX200V, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and TX200V (18MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The SP-800 UZ was announced 24 months before the TX200V making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the SP-800 UZ matches up against the TX200V when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Sony TX200V
SP-800 UZ | TX200V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
TX200V | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 24 months |
Display dimension | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony TX200V
SP-800 UZ | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-800 UZ has outside measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Sony TX200V has proportions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the SP-800 UZ against the TX200V.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc9c0/bc9c09b2d6e780ffc53f08716a0e7e11990fbb76" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony TX200V size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony TX200V size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and TX200V is 69 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb53c/fb53cc6bf63cae3eb1c34dce43376ac75ede269b" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing specifications. The pic here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-800 UZ and TX200V.
To sum up, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Sony TX200V to provide you with extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05874/05874bc9dac3f812be085712f7ade11c95545072" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9313/a9313b09d045ef92d5ce256ef2e35a8cde46c2d8" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1000 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3.3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 12 secs | 2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455 grams (1.00 lbs) | 129 grams (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $270 | $500 |