Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0063/e00637e5677671b8b72fa1976b25d95bb3a79c37" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ front Olympus SP-810 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
- 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
- Launched July 2011
- Old Model is Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. The resolution of the SP-810 UZ (14MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is pretty similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The SP-810 UZ was revealed 19 months later than the Tough-3000 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the SP-810 UZ matches up against the Tough-3000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-810 UZ & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The full galleries are available at Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Olympus Tough-3000
SP-810 UZ | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 19 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus SP-810 UZ
Tough-3000 | SP-810 UZ |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Olympus Tough-3000
SP-810 UZ | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-810 UZ comes with outside dimensions of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Olympus Tough-3000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the SP-810 UZ compared to the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1df68/1df68372c76ce50c6ae06feb89ed75ce91a2bc86" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-810 UZ and Tough-3000 is 78 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8de89/8de891dfb6302635cd9743f4d31c8bbae316d963" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to see the gap between sensor measurements purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-810 UZ and Tough-3000.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus SP-810 UZ to offer extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher SP-810 UZ is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21863/21863ff5160ec91fbfeb7b23fd37cbac3195d0f4" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a291c/a291c04d78fd92d0548126012fb67421123c04b6" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus SP-810 UZ | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus SP-810 UZ | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2011-07-27 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-864mm (36.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-5.7 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 0.7fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.20 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 413 gr (0.91 lbs) | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $280 | $0 |