Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VG-160
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus 6020 versus Olympus VG-160, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are sold by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 6020 was released 23 months earlier than the VG-160 making the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the 6020 scores versus the VG-160 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus VG-160
| 6020 | VG-160 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus 6020
| VG-160 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 23 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Olympus VG-160
| 6020 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6020 offers external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 6020 versus Olympus VG-160 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the 6020 versus the VG-160.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and VG-160 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through specifications. The pic underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and VG-160.
Plainly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus VG-160 to give greater detail as a result of its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged 6020 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Also referred to as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 122 grams (0.27 pounds) | 125 grams (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 165 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $279 | $90 |