Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Sony A58
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
68 Imaging
61 Features
72 Overall
65
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Sony A58 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
- 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
- Released July 2011
- Old Model is Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 16000 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 492g - 129 x 95 x 78mm
- Launched November 2013
- Older Model is Sony A57
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Sony A58: A Hands-On, In-Depth Camera Comparison
When it comes to choosing the right camera for your photography adventures, the landscape is wide and varied. Recently, I had the opportunity to extensively test two very different models: the Olympus SP-810 UZ, a small sensor superzoom bridge camera from 2011, and the Sony A58, a 2013 entry-level DSLR (more precisely a translucent mirror camera) with a much larger APS-C sensor. Despite their obvious contrasts in category and age, I wanted to dig beneath the spec sheets to assess their real-world photographic performance across multiple genres, usability, and value for money.
Having personally pushed both cameras through varied shooting scenarios - from portraits to wildlife to night scenes - I share my insights here with transparent detail so you can confidently decide which fits your creative goals and budget. I take a practical, evidence-based approach informed by industry-standard evaluation techniques and real photography challenges.
First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics
Before zooming into technical performance, one of the most immediate tactile experiences shapes how a camera feels in practical use. The Olympus SP-810 UZ leans into the bridge camera ethos, coming in compact but quite chunky for a fixed-lens model. In contrast, the Sony A58 is a DSLR-style body that's larger but surprisingly lightweight for its category.

With dimensions of 106x76x74mm and a weight of 413g, the Olympus is pocketable enough for travel but still bulky enough to be noticed when shooting handheld long zoom shots. You feel the solidity of the build, but the plastic chassis and lack of weather sealing keep it feeling consumer-level. Its fixed 36x zoom lens compromises ergonomics slightly - the lens barrel can feel front-heavy - and given the lack of a viewfinder, framing can become awkward under bright sunlight.
The Sony A58, at 129x95x78mm and 492g, feels more substantial and comfortable in hand given the larger grip and robust construction. Although it lacks weather sealing, the build quality leans toward prosumer. The electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 100% coverage and 0.65x magnification is a standout, offering a confident framing experience unmatched by the SP-810’s LCD-only design.
On top, control layouts reveal predictable differences: the Sony has dedicated dials and buttons for exposure modes, ISO, and exposure compensation, matching DSLR conventions. Meanwhile, the Olympus offers a simpler interface with fewer manual controls, reflecting its target novice market.

For photographers accustomed to manual controls and quick access to settings, the Sony’s ergonomics are far superior. The SP-810, with its limited buttons and menus, feels restrictive under demanding scenarios like sports or wildlife photography.
The Heart of the Image: Sensor and Image Quality Comparison
Arguably the most critical component affecting your photos is the sensor - a camera’s “eye.” Here, the gap between the two cameras is immense.
The Olympus SP-810 UZ sports a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring just 6.17x4.55mm with a total area of 28.07 mm² and resolution of 14 megapixels. In contrast, the Sony A58 boasts an APS-C CMOS sensor of 23.2x15.4mm (a whopping 348 mm² area) at 20 megapixels.

Beyond size, this difference translates into genuine advantages. The Sony’s larger sensor captures more light, facilitating better low-light performance, higher dynamic range, and overall image detail. The A58’s sensor is paired with newer CMOS technology, benefiting from improved noise control and higher ISO sensitivity up to 16,000 native (with ISO 25,600 boost), ideal for dim conditions. The Olympus maxes out at ISO 3200 on a much smaller sensor, resulting in noisier images at higher ISOs.
In practical daylight shooting, the Olympus images are serviceable but show typical bridge camera compromises: moderate dynamic range leads to shadow crush and blown highlights, and fine detail suffers beyond about ISO 400. The Sony images, on the other hand, deliver punchy colors, excellent contrast, and notably reduced noise even up to high ISO settings.
Color depth and dynamic range measurements (from ĐxoMark testing for the Sony) further affirm this, with a color depth of 23.3 EV and dynamic range of 12.5 EV. The SP-810 lacks formal test data, but subjective use shows it trailing well behind.
Behind the Scenes: Autofocus and Shooting Speed
A camera's autofocus (AF) system and continuous shooting performance make or break its usability across genres like sports and wildlife.
The SP-810 relies solely on contrast-detection AF with no phase detection, and it doesn’t offer manual focus. Its sluggish AF speed, coupled with a weak buffer for shooting continuously at only 0.7 fps, defines it as a camera designed for casual, deliberate shooting rather than fast action.
The Sony A58, benefiting from its translucent mirror design, features 15 phase-detection points (with 3 cross-type points) and contrast-detection AF that work simultaneously for smoother, accurate tracking. The continuous shooting speed of up to 8 fps with autofocus tracking is impressive for an entry-level DSLR. This makes it highly capable for capturing sports, wildlife, and fast-moving street scenes.
Crucially, face detection is supported by both cameras, but only the Sony offers selective AF area modes, improving precision on tricky compositions.
When I tested the AF under varied lighting, the Sony showed remarkably snappy and reliable acquisition of focus on moving subjects, while the Olympus would hesitate or hunt noticeably.
Viewing Your Scenes: Screen and Viewfinder Usability
Both cameras provide live view, but the way you see your scene can influence composition comfort and accuracy greatly.
The Olympus uses a fixed 3-inch LCD screen with merely 230k dots of resolution and no touchscreen functionality. Outdoors in bright light, it’s tough to discern details on this low-res screen, and without an electronic viewfinder, your only framing option is this screen.
The Sony, meanwhile, offers a tilting 2.7-inch LCD with 460k dots and - critically - an OLED electronic viewfinder with 1440k dots providing 100% frame coverage. The EVF renders your composition crisply, even in full sun, and keeps the camera steady when held to your eye.
This is a significant practical edge for the A58, especially in fast-paced shooting or bright conditions.

Versatility on the Lens Front: Fixed Zoom vs Interchangeable
Lens choice is often key to shaping your photographic style. The SP-810 sports a massive 36x zoom fixed lens covering 24-864mm equivalent focal length with an aperture range of f/2.9-5.7. This is ideal for casual travel or wildlife where one lens covers everything, but the image quality is limited by the zoom's compromises. Optical clarity softens toward the longest focal lengths, and aperture narrows quickly, limiting low light performance.
The Sony takes advantage of an interchangeable lens system (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount) with a mature ecosystem of over 140 lenses, from sharp primes to powerful telephotos and macro optics. This immediately offers expansive creative potential - paired with the larger sensor for quality results.
If you seek macro shooting, the ability to mount dedicated macro lenses on the A58 offers far more precise focusing and better image quality compared to the fixed lens on the SP-810.
Performance Across Photography Genres
To deliver meaningful advice, I put both cameras through the paces in varied photography disciplines. Here are the key takeaways:
Portrait Photography
The Olympus’s smaller sensor and fixed lens limit both background blur (bokeh) and dynamic range. Skin tones are often flat and less nuanced, with noise creeping in at indoor ISO settings. Face detection AF helps but is basic.
The Sony A58 excels with accurate eye detection, face priority AF, and ability to utilize fast prime lenses for smooth, creamy bokeh and fine skin tone gradation. Its RAW support lets you achieve professional color grading and exposure adjustments.
Landscape Photography
Here, resolution and dynamic range reign supreme. The Sony’s 20MP APS-C sensor captures landscapes with excellent detail, tonal separation, and highlights/shadows retention even in challenging contrast.
The Olympus’s small sensor means you’ll see limitations when cropping or printing large and struggle with blown skies or shadowed valleys.
Neither offers weather sealing, so extra care is needed outdoors.
Wildlife Photography
The SP-810’s monster zoom range is attractive for distant subjects, but the slow AF, lack of burst speed, and limited image quality frustrate serious wildlife shooters.
In contrast, the Sony offers fast, accurate autofocus tracking at 8 fps, ability to pair with super telephoto lenses, and superior image quality, making it the better choice for birding or animal photography.
Sports Photography
Similar to wildlife, the A58’s phase detection AF and continuous shooting get the nod here. The Olympus cannot keep pace with quick subject movement and suffers from shutter lag.
Street Photography
The Olympus’s compact-ish size and silent shutter could be somewhat discreet, but its sluggish responsiveness hinders capturing spontaneous moments. The Sony, while larger, offers quicker startup, EVF for framing, and faster focusing - in my experience making street shooting more satisfying.
Macro Photography
Without interchangeable lenses, the SP-810 is limited to fixed lens macro mode at 5cm minimum focus distance. The A58’s lens options enable higher magnifications and better working distances with sharper output.
Night and Astro Photography
The Sony’s greater ISO capability, longer exposure controls (up to 30s), and RAW shooting immensely improve night shots. The Olympus’s max shutter speed of 1/1200s and max ISO 3200 with no RAW limit its astrophotography use.
Video Capabilities
The Olympus records 720p video at 30fps with basic MPEG-4 format - adequate for casual use but not detailed or smooth enough for serious work.
The Sony delivers Full HD 1080p at 60fps (progressive), with AVCHD and MPEG4 support, along with an external microphone jack - major plus for videographers focused on audio quality.
Travel Photography
Choosing a camera for travel means weighing size, versatility, and battery life.
While the Olympus is smaller and lighter, it lacks the manual control and image quality desirable for serious travel photography.
The Sony’s versatility, longer battery life (690 shots per charge), and lens options provide more situational flexibility, albeit in a slightly bulkier body.
Build Quality, Connectivity, and Battery Life
Neither camera is weather sealed, so neither is ideal for harsh weather conditions.
The Olympus uses a Li-50B battery; Sony uses the larger NP-FM500H with significantly longer battery life according to CIPA standards (690 shots vs unknown for Olympus).
Both have SD memory card slots; Sony also supports Memory Stick formats. Connectivity-wise, the Olympus has no wireless options; Sony supports Eye-Fi wireless cards for remote transfer. Both offer HDMI and USB 2.0 ports.
Putting It All Together: Performance Ratings and Image Samples
To summarize the performance objectively, I factor in sensor performance, autofocus, ergonomics, video, and real-world usability.
And here is a side-by-side gallery of image samples from each camera, showcasing portrait, landscape, wildlife, and low light shots to visualize the technical differences:
Who Should Buy the Olympus SP-810 UZ?
- Casual photographers wanting a lightweight point-and-shoot with a huge zoom range ripe for travel snapshots
- Beginners placed on a budget who want all-in-one shooting without the complexity of interchangeable lenses or advanced controls
- Users who primarily photograph outdoors in good light and prioritize zoom range over image quality
However, if you intend to print large, shoot in low light, or require fine creative control, the SP-810 will likely frustrate.
Who Should Consider the Sony A58?
- Photography enthusiasts seeking a beginner-friendly DSLR-style camera with advanced manual controls
- Users wanting higher image quality, especially with better low light and wider dynamic range
- Those interested in growing their lens collection and experimenting with various genres including portrait, wildlife, macro, and sports
- Video shooters requiring full HD with external microphone options
- Anyone who prioritizes fast autofocus and continuous shooting performance
Final Thoughts: Expertise-Based Recommendations
From my extensive testing and comparing thousands of cameras across a range of real-world scenarios, I can confidently say that the Sony A58 represents a more future-proof, versatile tool. It delivers superior image quality, better autofocus, manual controls, and video capabilities that serve serious amateurs and semi-pros well.
The Olympus SP-810 UZ, while impressive for a 2011 superzoom bridge camera in sheer focal reach, is very much an entry-level, casual shooter with limited creative potential, especially by today's standards.
If budget is tight and the idea is a fun, hassle-free “all-round” camera with massive zoom for casual shooting, the SP-810 remains a practical choice.
But for those willing to invest in photographic growth, the Sony A58 offers a more satisfying, enduring experience with space to develop your craft.
Feel free to engage with me if you want to explore specific use case scenarios or have questions on lenses and accessories for either camera. Choosing the right camera is about matching your shooting style, goals, and budget - and I’m here to help you get that match right.
Safe shooting and happy clicking!
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Sony A58 Specifications
| Olympus SP-810 UZ | Sony SLT-A58 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus SP-810 UZ | Sony SLT-A58 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2011-07-27 | 2013-11-27 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 24-864mm (36.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.65x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1200s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 0.7fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.20 m | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 413 gr (0.91 lb) | 492 gr (1.08 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") | 129 x 95 x 78mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 753 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 690 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $280 | $645 |