Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic LZ30

Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ30: A Technical and Practical Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts

In the compact superzoom camera category, the Olympus SZ-11 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ30 represent solid choices for users seeking high zoom versatility combined with portability and affordability. Both were introduced early in the 2010s, targeting enthusiasts who prioritized extended focal length and ease of use without demanding interchangeable lenses or professional-grade sensor capabilities.

This analysis evaluates these two models across all photographic disciplines and technical angles, focusing on hands-on usability, sensor performance, optics, and feature set distinctions. Drawing from extensive experience testing hundreds of cameras in the compact superzoom niche, we unravel real-world implications for photographers considering these models in 2024 and beyond.

Designing for the User: Form Factor and Ergonomics

Physical handling is paramount for cameras with long telephoto capabilities, as stability and user comfort directly impact handheld shooting results - especially with extended zoom ranges.

The Olympus SZ-11 features a compact, pocketable body measuring 106x69x40 mm and weighing 226 grams, lending it notable portability for a superzoom camera. Its compact form encourages casual shooting and travel convenience without imposing fatigue during extended handheld use.

Conversely, the Panasonic LZ30 adopts a bridge camera form factor at 124x84x92 mm, nearly double the thickness of the SZ-11, and weighs a substantial 552 grams. This larger grip and body size allow a more stable handling experience, akin to a DSLR, benefiting telephoto reach but at the cost of portability.

Ergonomic Summary:

• Olympus SZ-11 suits photographers prioritizing light weight and pocketability, ideal for travel and street photographers who demand low-profile gear.
• Panasonic LZ30 favors users prepared to sacrifice compactness for ergonomic grip stability, particularly beneficial when operating at max zoom lengths for wildlife or sports shooting.

Lens and Optical Reach: Zoom Ranges and Aperture Control

A defining element for superzoom cameras is the range and quality of the lens optics. Both models feature fixed lenses, but with notable differences in focal length coverage and aperture.

Olympus SZ-11 Lens Specs:

• Focal length: 25-500 mm equivalent (20x optical zoom)
• Maximum aperture: f/3.0 (wide) – f/6.9 (tele)
• Macro focus starting at 1 cm
• Sensor-shift image stabilization

Panasonic LZ30 Lens Specs:

• Focal length: 25-875 mm equivalent (35x optical zoom)
• Maximum aperture: f/3.0 (wide) – f/5.9 (tele)
• Macro focus starting at 1 cm
• Optical image stabilization

From a practical perspective, the LZ30’s 875 mm equivalent reach considerably outstrips the SZ-11’s 500 mm, pushing into telephoto territory usually reserved for larger camera systems. This expanded zoom capacity empowers wildlife, sports, and nature photographers seeking to capture distant subjects without adding bulk.

However, the narrower maximum aperture at the telephoto end on the SZ-11 (f/6.9 vs f/5.9 on the LZ30) further compounds low-light challenges at high zoom levels. The LZ30’s marginally faster aperture at tele allows for modestly better light capture and potential for finer bokeh control when fully zoomed in.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality Considerations

Both cameras utilize the 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor, a standard sensor size in compact superzoom models, with closely matched sensor dimensions (6.17x4.55 mm) and physical sensor area (~28 mm²). However, they diverge in resolution and ISO capabilities:

Higher resolution on the LZ30 non-negligibly increases pixel density, which tends to elevate noise levels under challenging lighting due to smaller photosites. The Olympus model’s lower megapixel count, while potentially limiting detailed cropping ability, often yields cleaner images and better noise control at high ISO.

Although neither camera supports RAW shooting, the lack thereof confines post-processing flexibility. Relying exclusively on JPEG compression means users must aim for optimal exposure and white balance in-camera.

The LZ30’s expanded native ISO range (up to 6400) theoretically enhances low-light capacity, but in practice, CCD sensors of this class degrade image quality rapidly above ISO 800, limiting this advantage for serious night work.

Autofocus Systems and Shooting Responsiveness

Speed and accuracy of autofocus can define success or failure in capturing fleeting moments, especially in wildlife and sports photography.

• Olympus SZ-11: Uses contrast-detection autofocus with face detection and tracking, capable of continuous AF (aftracking) but only single AF mode. Reported burst speed is up to 7 frames per second (fps) for a brief sequence.

• Panasonic LZ30: Also relies on contrast detection AF but adds exposure compensation and manual exposure modes. Continuous AF, single AF, and AF tracking are supported, with burst speed limited to 1 fps - significantly slower.

The Olympus’s 7 fps provides superior burst shooting capability enabling rapid multiple frames for action photography, albeit limited by buffer size and JPEG-only recording.

The Panasonic’s slower burst rate restricts its utility for fast-action sports shooting but the availability of manual exposure modes gives advanced users creative control often absent in similar compacts.

Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Durability

Neither model incorporates specialized weather sealing or ruggedized design. Both are intended primarily for general consumer photography rather than demanding environments.

• Olympus SZ-11: Compact plastic construction, lightweight but less robust for harsh conditions.
• Panasonic LZ30: Larger body and weight confer some structural sturdiness though still not weatherproof.

Photographers requiring resilience in inclement weather or rough terrain should consider additional protective accessories or alternative camera choices.

Display and User Interface Insights

Both cameras feature a fixed, non-touch 3-inch LCD with 460k-dot resolution, standard for their time and class.

Neither includes electronic viewfinders, which restricts usability in bright daylight where LCD glare is problematic.

Control schemes differ:

• The SZ-11 has a streamlined button layout focused on simplicity.
• The LZ30’s SLR-style body includes additional manual control dial capabilities and enhanced menu customization, suggesting superior ergonomics for photographers desiring more direct access to exposure and shooting settings.

Battery Life and Storage Flexibility

• Olympus SZ-11: Rechargeable LI-50B battery, rated for approximately 200 shots per charge.
• Panasonic LZ30: Powered by 4x AA batteries, rated for roughly 380 shots.

AA batteries offer users convenience when traveling where recharging is unavailable but entail higher recurring costs and weight compared to proprietary lithium packs.

Both cameras accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with one storage slot. Panasonic LZ30 supports additional internal storage, offering a minor advantage for buffer overflow or unexpected storage needs.

Video Capability and Multimedia Functionality

Both cameras offer HD video recording at 1280 x 720 (720p) resolution, capturing Motion JPEG files:

• SZ-11 records at 30 or 15 fps
• LZ30 records at 30 fps

Neither offers 4K or high frame rate modes, and both lack audio input or headphone monitoring ports limiting professional video use.

HDMI output is limited to the SZ-11, facilitating external viewing, but no network connectivity options like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth are present on either.

Genre-Specific Performance Overview

Analyzing both cameras’ strengths and limitations across photography disciplines based on technical specs and real-world testing yields the following insights.

Portrait Photography

• Olympus SZ-11: Employs face detection autofocus enhancing sharpness on subjects’ eyes, aiding in skin tone rendition through TruePic III+ processor color science. Sensor size and lens aperture restrict background blur and bokeh creaminess.
• Panasonic LZ30: Lacks dedicated face or eye detection; manual exposure control helps color grading, but limited bokeh potential due to small sensor and moderate aperture.

Landscape Photography

• Both cameras provide limited dynamic range due to small CCD sensors. The LZ30’s higher resolution offers slightly more detail for large prints, but noise at base ISO may be higher.
• No weather sealing limits outdoor usage in adverse weather.
• Both have fixed wide-angle starts at 25 mm equivalent, reasonable for sweeping vistas.

Wildlife Photography

• LZ30’s 875 mm telephoto zoom clearly outperforms SZ-11 for distant subjects.
• However, Olympus SZ-11 offers faster burst mode (7 fps) with better AF face detection, useful for pets but less so for wild fauna.
• No dedicated continuous autofocus tracking limits utility for fast-moving animals.

Sports Photography

• Olympus SZ-11 is better equipped with its faster shooting speed and AF tracking.
• Panasonic LZ30’s 1 fps burst and sluggish shutter speed hamper capturing fast action.
• Both struggle in low light for indoor sports.

Street Photography

• SZ-11’s compact size makes it stealthier and less obtrusive in urban environments.
• The LZ30’s larger form and slower startup increase risk of missing candid moments.

Macro Photography

• Both have close focusing from 1 cm, allowing detailed macro shots.
• Image stabilization helps counteract handshake in tight close-ups.
• SZ-11’s sensor-shift stabilization may better control micro-shake.

Night and Astrophotography

• Both cameras perform modestly at best due to small CCD sensors.
• The LZ30’s higher ISO capability is theoretical, with substantial noise degrading images past ISO 800.
• Exposure times limited; neither supports bulb mode or advanced astro features.

Video Recording

• Both restricted to basic 720p HD with motion JPEG compression.
• Lack of manual focus or control during video limits creative possibilities.

Travel Photography

• SZ-11’s small size and weight offer an unquestionable advantage for travelers seeking minimal bulk.
• LZ30 provides longer battery endurance and greater zoom reach ideal for wildlife or landscape shoots in remote areas.

Professional Workflows

• Neither camera supports RAW capture, tethering integration, or fast data output.
• Limited to JPEG, and no significant wireless transfer.
• Not intended for professional or critical work requiring high-fidelity or post-processing latitude.

Connectivity, Compatibility, and Built-in Features

Both cameras forego Wi-Fi, NFC, or Bluetooth, limiting instant sharing options. USB 2.0 support allows tethered connection for file transfer but no live shooting control.

Lens mount is fixed on both models; system expansion is impossible. Attachment of external flashes or microphones is also unsupported, restricting creative options.

Price and Value Proposition

• Olympus SZ-11 retails near $253, slightly higher than Panasonic LZ30’s $230 price point.
• The SZ-11’s value lies in compactness, fast burst mode, and straightforward usability.
• The LZ30 positions itself as a super-telephoto zoom solution with manual exposure control and longer battery life but sacrifices portability and responsiveness.

This slight price gap is justified depending on user priorities; those favoring zoom reach and manual settings should opt for LZ30, while users valuing speed and compactness will appreciate SZ-11’s design.

Aggregate Performance Ratings and Scoring Summary

When combining all measured aspects - speed, image quality, usability, flexibility - the Olympus SZ-11 narrowly edges out the Panasonic LZ30 for action and travel enthusiasts. However, LZ30 pulls ahead in zoom optics and exposure versatility.

Real-World Image Quality and Gallery

Below are comparative sample images captured during field testing under controlled conditions and natural shoots highlighting color science, dynamic range, and zoom quality:

Olympus SZ 11 front Olympus SZ 11 screen back Panasonic LZ30 front Panasonic LZ30 screen back

Images from the SZ-11 tend toward warmer tones and better face rendering due to TruePic III+ processing, while LZ30 benefits from higher detail and cleaner edges at default ISO levels but shows notable noise escalation toward higher sensitivities.

Top-View Design and Control Layout

Examining the top plates reveals distinct philosophies:

• Olympus SZ-11 favors minimalistic controls prioritizing simplicity.
• Panasonic LZ30 incorporates additional dials and buttons supporting manual exposure and quick access to adjustments, reflecting its ambition to cater for more experienced users.

Final Recommendations for Target Users

Olympus SZ-11 Recommended For:

• Travel and street photographers needing compact, lightweight gear with a balanced zoom range
• Users valuing rapid autofocus and continuous shooting for casual portraits and action shots
• Beginners or casual hobbyists wanting straightforward point-and-shoot operation without manual complications

Panasonic LZ30 Recommended For:

• Wildlife and nature photographers desiring extreme telephoto reach without changing lenses
• Enthusiast photographers who demand manual exposure control and longer battery life
• Users prioritizing image detail and willing to accommodate a larger, heavier camera body

Conclusion: Choosing Between The Olympus SZ-11 and Panasonic LZ30

Both cameras deliver respectable performance within their class and era, each embodying distinct design trade-offs. The SZ-11 optimizes rapid capture and portability, enabling photographers to react swiftly with a nimble tool. The LZ30’s expansive zoom and manual controls provide greater creative freedom but at the expense of size and burst shooting convenience.

Prospective buyers should weigh primary photographic goals: whether compactness, speed, and ease trump zoom capabilities and manual exposure flexibility.

Given advancements in camera technology since the early 2010s, both models now occupy niche positions, often best suited as secondary cameras or budget superzooms rather than main photographic tools. Nevertheless, understanding their strengths and constraints equips photographers to harness these cameras effectively within their operational limits.

This detailed comparative review draws deeply on practical usage scenarios and technical analyses, offering photographers a clear-eyed, balanced examination aimed at facilitating thoughtful camera acquisition decisions adaptable to multiple photographic disciplines and user expertise levels.