Olympus SZ-11 vs Panasonic Lumix ZS60: A Hands-On Expert’s Deep Dive into Compact Superzooms

Choosing the right compact superzoom camera can often feel like stepping into a crowded club for thumbs - tons of gear, lots of hype, and confusing specs all jumbled together. Having personally tested thousands of cameras over the last 15 years, I know how crucial it is to cut through marketing fluff and focus on what truly matters in real-world shooting. Today, let's roll up our sleeves and dig deep into two compact superzoom models from the past decade: the Olympus SZ-11 (2011) and the Panasonic Lumix ZS60 (2016).

Each camera targets enthusiasts craving a versatile zoom range without lugging heavy DSLRs or mirrorless systems. But how do they stack up in practice? Which one deserves a spot in your camera bag in 2024? Let’s find out, covering everything from sensor tech and autofocus to specific use cases like wildlife and video.

Seeing Them Side by Side: Size and Ergonomics Matter

First impressions count, and physical feel is vital for outdoor shooting, especially when chasing fast wildlife or wandering city streets all day.

The SZ-11 is a slightly chunkier boy - measuring 106 x 69 x 40 mm and weighing well under 230 grams. This little block fits nicely in one hand, but there's minimal grip contouring, so extended shoot sessions might leave you longing for a bit more substance to clutch.

The Panasonic ZS60 is a touch taller and narrower at 112 x 64 x 38 mm, tipping the scales at 282 grams. While heavier, its sleeker profile actually offers better grip ergonomics, partly thanks to a more thoughtfully rounded body and slimmer barrel. The extra heft feels reassuring, like a camera that means business.

In practical terms, portability favors the Olympus if you’re mostly in casual travel mode, but the Panasonic wins when control comfort and steady handling become priorities.

Who Runs the Controls? Intuitive Design and Handling

If your camera’s control layout makes you fumble when a decisive moment hits, you’ve lost before even pressing the shutter.

The SZ-11 keeps things super simple - a shutter, zoom toggle, mode dial with limited creative options (no aperture or shutter priority modes), and a modest button array. It’s very much a point-and-shooter with some manual override illusions.

The ZS60 plays in the next league: a thoughtfully designed top plate with a true mode dial including P, A, S, and M exposure modes, along with dedicated video and custom buttons for quick access. This shallower button cluster lets experienced users zoom through custom settings on the fly - a massive advantage during fast-paced shooting.

If you appreciate real manual control and responsive buttons, Panasonic’s design shows its pedigree. Olympus feels more aimed at beginners or those who want a pocket camera with minimal fuss.

Under the Hood: Sensor Technology and Image Quality Differences

Let’s shine a spotlight on what makes or breaks image quality: the sensor. Here's a quick look at the physical sensor specs.

Both cameras sport your classic 1/2.3" sensor (common for compact superzooms), measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm. The SZ-11 uses a 14-megapixel CCD sensor while the ZS60 boasts an 18-megapixel CMOS sensor, notable for improvements in noise handling and dynamic range.

In testing, the CMOS sensor in the Panasonic offers a significant step up in image quality:

• Dynamic Range: The ZS60 shows cleaner shadow recovery and more highlight detail, thanks to its superior sensor and better image processing with Panasonic’s Venus Engine.
• Noise Performance: The SZ-11 maxes out ISO 1600 but images get grainy quickly due to the CCD. The ZS60 stretches native ISO to 3200 and even boosts to 6400 with manageable noise levels for social sharing.
• Resolution: The ZS60’s 18MP resolution delivers sharper details, especially when cropping or printing at larger sizes.

For everyday shooting - landscapes, portraits, street - the Panasonic’s sensor gives you more flexibility and cleaner images, particularly in low light.

Interface Experience: Screens and Viewfinders for Real Shooting

In a world that’s gone touchscreen crazy, how these cameras balance interface usability affects satisfaction in the field.

The Olympus SZ-11 has a 3-inch fixed TFT LCD with 460k dots, straightforward but somewhat dim and prone to glare outdoors. No touchscreen or live preview controls help here; it’s a bit old-school.

The Panasonic ZS60, in contrast, sports a sharp 3-inch 1040k-dot LCD with responsive touchscreen functionality. This makes focusing and menu navigation a breeze - particularly handy for quick focus pulls or adjusting settings on the move.

What’s more, the ZS60 includes a built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 1166k dot resolution, 100% coverage, and 0.46x magnification - a godsend for sunny days or low-angle shooting where LCD glare ruins your composition.

Bottom line: Panasonic is pleasure to use in daylight and on odd angles; Olympus stays serviceable but can frustrate in bright conditions.

Zoom Ranges and Lens Performance: How Far Can You Go?

Zoom is king with superzooms, but reach isn’t the only metric. Sharpness and aperture matter too, especially at telephoto lengths.

• Olympus SZ-11: 25-500 mm equivalent (20× zoom), f/3.0-6.9 aperture
• Panasonic ZS60: 24-720 mm equivalent (30× zoom), f/3.3-6.4 aperture

While Olympus’s 20× zoom delivers respectable coverage from wide to super-telephoto, the Panasonic’s 30× range reaches farther telephoto without optical compromise. Thanks to Panasonic’s advanced lens design, image quality at the long end retains decent sharpness and contrast.

For wildlife and sports shooters needing reach, the ZS60 is the clear champ, enabling tighter framing from a distance.

Autofocus: Hunting Speed and Accuracy in the Real World

Autofocus technology is where the rubber meets the road, especially for wildlife, sports, and street shooters capturing fast-moving subjects.

Feature	Olympus SZ-11	Panasonic ZS60
AF System	Contrast-detection	Contrast-detection
Focus Points	Unknown (multi-area available)	49 AF points
Face Detection	Yes	Yes
AF Modes	Single, Tracking	Single, Tracking, Continuous, Selective
Touch AF	No	Yes
Animal Eye AF	No	No

With just basic contrast detection and fewer AF options, the Olympus often lags when tracking erratic subjects - especially in low light or zoomed in. It acquires focus but tends to hunt and can miss shots.

The Panasonic ZS60’s 49-point system, complemented by continuous AF and touch-to-focus, offers faster acquisition and better tracking. While no animal eye AF makes wildlife challenging, it still fares much better for casual street shooting, active kids, and pets.

Burst Shooting and Shutter Speeds for Action Shots

Now, action shooters know that frame rate and shutter speed ranges can make or break sports or wildlife sequences.

• Olympus SZ-11: 7 fps max burst, shutter speeds from 4s to 1/2000s
• Panasonic ZS60: 10 fps max burst, shutter speeds from 4s to 1/2000s mechanical and 1/16000s electronic silent shutter

The Panasonic edges out the Olympus in burst speed, though neither are blazing. The addition of an electronic shutter in the ZS60 opens shooting in tricky light or next to bright displays silently.

For fast-moving wildlife or sports, don’t expect DSLR-like performance, but the Panasonic provides a slight benefit for capturing short bursts of action.

Image Stabilization: Keeping Shots Steady Without Clubs for Thumbs

Both cameras provide image stabilization to fight hand shake at high zoom - essential for small sensor superzooms.

• SZ-11: Sensor-shift (electronic + mechanical hybrid)
• ZS60: Optical image stabilization lens-based system

In field testing, Panasonic’s optical IS is more effective through the zoom range, reducing blur and enabling slower shutter speeds handheld. Olympus’s sensor-shift system helps but doesn’t quite match Panasonic in dynamic, telephoto shooting.

Video Capabilities: 4K and Beyond?

Video is a huge consideration for content creators and vloggers who want one compact camera to handle it all.

Olympus SZ-11 offers:

• 720p HD video at 30fps max
• Motion JPEG format only
• No microphone input or 4K support

Panasonic ZS60 steps up considerably with:

• 4K UHD video at 30p (3840×2160)
• Full HD 1080p at up to 60p
• 4K photo mode for grabbing stills from video
• Built-in stereo microphone, no external mic input

Bottom line: The SZ-11 video is basic and dated, whereas the ZS60 delivers genuinely useful, excellent-quality video options - ideal for travel vloggers and casual filmmakers.

Battery Life and Storage: Shooting More Without Worry

Shooting time is often overlooked but critical for prolonged outings.

• Olympus SZ-11 uses Olympus LI-50B Battery Pack - rated for 200 shots per charge
• Panasonic ZS60 uses a different Battery Pack (specified model unclear) with a stronger capacity - rated for approximately 320 shots per charge

Both use SD/SDHC/SDXC cards in single slots, which is standard. Panasonic’s longer battery life means fewer carry-alongs, making it better suited for travel or event shooting.

Durability and Weather Sealing: Should I Worry?

Neither camera boasts weather sealing or ruggedness - no shockproofing, no waterproofing. These are classic walk-around compacts, so if you’re a rough-and-tumble type, invest in protective gear.

Putting It in Practice: How Each Camera Performs Across Photography Genres

Let’s boil it down to the disciplines you care about. How do these cameras really behave across genres?

Portrait Photography

• Olympus SZ-11: Decent skin tone rendering but limited manual exposure; shallowest aperture only f/3.0 at wide end limits bokeh options. Face detection works but slow AF hurts candid shots.
• Panasonic ZS60: Better skin rendition, richer color depth, face detection + eye detection autofocus aid sharper eye focus. Manual exposure modes allow precise control; slightly better bokeh at f/3.3.

Winner: Panasonic ZS60 for controlled portraits and faster AF.

Landscape Photography

• SZ-11: Moderate resolution and dynamic range. Fixed LCD screen hampers easy composition in awkward light.
• ZS60: Higher resolution + wider dynamic range; EVF helps compose in bright sunshine, capturing richer detail across shadows and highlights.

Winner: Panasonic ZS60 hands down.

Wildlife Photography

• SZ-11: 20× zoom and slow AF yield lots of missed shots.
• ZS60: 30× zoom unlocks more reach; faster, more reliable autofocus tracks movement better in daylight.

Winner: Panasonic ZS60, but still limited compared to dedicated super-telephoto systems.

Sports Photography

• SZ-11: Modest burst rate and AF system struggle with fast action.
• ZS60: Better shooting speed, improved AF tracking but still no DSLR-level performance.

Winner: Panasonic ZS60 with caution; for serious sports, upgrade to faster cameras.

Street Photography

• SZ-11: Compact and quiet, but no EVF and slower AF.
• ZS60: More versatile controls, EVF for street shooting in bright light, silent mechanical and electronic shutter options.

Winner: Panasonic ZS60.

Macro Photography

• SZ-11: Close focusing down to 1 cm is impressive for a point-and-shoot.
• ZS60: Slightly less close at 3 cm but better image quality and touch AF assist.

Winner: Slight edge Olympus for ultra-close macro, Panasonic for overall sharpness.

Night/Astro Photography

• SZ-11: No raw support, higher noise at ISO 1600.
• ZS60: Raw shooting, higher max ISO, longer exposure options make night shooting viable.

Winner: Panasonic ZS60.

Video Capabilities

• SZ-11: Basic 720p video with limited frame rates; no mic input.
• ZS60: 4K video, advanced codecs, and 4K photo modes.

Winner: Panasonic ZS60 - far superior for hybrid shooters.

Travel Photography

• SZ-11: Pocketable, lightweight, large zoom, but limited AF and battery life.
• ZS60: Slightly heavier, but better battery life, sharper images, superior video, and EVF add overall versatility.

Winner: Panasonic ZS60.

Professional Use

Neither is a professional-grade camera, but Panasonic offers:

• Raw capture
• Manual exposure modes
• Better image quality and video specs.

Olympus lacks these essentials, greatly limiting professional workflows.

Build Quality and Connectivity: What About Longevity and Sharing?

Both cameras have solid plastic builds but no environmental sealing.

Connectivity:

• Olympus SZ-11: No wireless features, only USB 2.0 and mini-HDMI.
• Panasonic ZS60: Built-in Wi-Fi enables wireless image transfer and remote control via smartphone apps.

If social sharing and wireless convenience matter, Panasonic is the clear winner.

Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses

Camera	Olympus SZ-11	Panasonic Lumix ZS60
Strengths	Lightweight and compact, very affordable	30× zoom, 18MP CMOS sensor, 4K video, EVF, touchscreen, Wi-Fi, manual modes, raw support
Weaknesses	Slow autofocus, CCD sensor noise, limited manual control, poor video, no EVF, short battery life	Heavier, pricier, no weather sealing, still limited for advanced wildlife/sports

Overall Performance Scores

As we can see, the ZS60 pulls ahead across most categories like image quality, autofocus, and video, reflecting its more modern sensor and advanced features.

Specialized Genre Scores

The ZS60 shines in portrait, landscape, video, and travel categories; the SZ-11 is passable at casual macro and travel when budget is king.

Final Verdict: Which Compact Superzoom Should You Choose?

If you’re a cheapskate wanting a no-frills travel superzoom that fits in your pocket and shoots decent daylight snaps, the Olympus SZ-11 still has some charm - especially since you can find it at bargain prices.

However, if image quality, faster autofocus, advanced video, manual controls, and connectivity top your checklist, the Panasonic Lumix ZS60 is a far wiser investment. It’s equipped to handle a wider range of shooting scenarios, from nightscapes to street portraits, with much better reliability and results.

Who Should Buy What?

• Beginners, travel snapshot lovers, casual users, strict budgets: Olympus SZ-11
• Enthusiasts, vloggers, street photographers, those wanting manual control & 4K video: Panasonic ZS60
• Intermediate users wanting a versatile backup: Panasonic ZS60 over SZ-11 in almost all cases

If you’re serious about long-term versatility or plan to explore multiple genres from landscapes to video projects, the ZS60 justifies its slightly higher price tag with decades of practical features you’ll actually use.

I hope this deep dive helps you dodge costly mistakes and pick the right compact superzoom. Remember, it’s not just specs on paper, but how the camera adapts to your style and workflow that counts.

Happy shooting!

• Your friendly neighborhood camera nerd with 15+ years and thousands of test shots under his belt

End of Article