Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7e21/a7e2113adb5f22cfd856c9b9ebf2ca5403c26cd4" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS front Olympus SZ-16 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Here is a extensive analysis of the Olympus SZ-16 iHS versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the SZ-16 iHS (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") feature different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SZ-16 iHS was launched at a similar time to the XZ-2 iHS so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the SZ-16 iHS scores vs the XZ-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SZ-16 iHS & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
SZ-16 iHS | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
XZ-2 iHS | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
SZ-16 iHS | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | December 2012 | Same age |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS has outer dimensions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SZ-16 iHS versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the SZ-16 iHS against the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06e59/06e59075ec093dde7aa73e0355d4a0e35c29ef48" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-16 iHS and XZ-2 iHS is 89 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/817f3/817f3c86c5cd7d20dc0ce20c963a31ed0717ecd7" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing simply by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-16 iHS and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can see, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SZ-16 iHS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS will show extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17eb6/17eb6420e0d04082d47d06c117b94de40c499e30" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c824/2c824855208639a562d86ad999bfb3fe19f2f742" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-01-08 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | 340 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $230 | $450 |