Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37


70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Launched February 2014

Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Olympus SZ-16 iHS versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is pretty close but the SZ-16 iHS (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) come with different sensor sizing.

The SZ-16 iHS was unveiled 13 months before the DP2 Quattro which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SZ-16 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the SZ-16 iHS scores against the DP2 Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
SZ-16 iHS | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
DP2 Quattro | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 13 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Sigma DP2 Quattro
SZ-16 iHS | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS features outside measurements of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SZ-16 iHS versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the SZ-16 iHS versus the DP2 Quattro.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-16 iHS and DP2 Quattro is 89 and 70 respectively.

Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specs. The pic here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SZ-16 iHS and DP2 Quattro.
All in all, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SZ-16 iHS with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will render more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged SZ-16 iHS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) | 395 grams (0.87 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $230 | $931 |