Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90: A Thorough Comparison for the Discerning Photographer

In my 15+ years of relentless camera testing, I’ve learned to dig beyond technical specs and marketing buzzwords to uncover how a camera truly performs in the hands of passionate photographers. Today, I’m diving deep into two compact, fixed-lens cameras from an earlier generation but still relevant for enthusiasts scouting affordable, all-in-one solutions with distinct personalities: the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 (hereafter Olympus SZ-16 and Sony T90). I’ll draw on hands-on testing, side-by-side comparisons, and a broad photography use-case lens to give you a crystal-clear picture of how these cameras hold up - from landscape vistas to urban street stories.

Getting to Know Their Physical Presence: Ergonomics & Design

Let’s start with how these cameras feel in hand since physical comfort and usability can make or break long shoots. The Olympus SZ-16 clearly embraces the “superzoom” compact ethos, sporting a chunky, robust body designed to command a broad zoom range. The Sony T90, by contrast, is one of the sleekes ultracompact cameras I've handled, shaving bulk for ultimate portability.

The SZ-16’s dimensions (108x70x40 mm, 226g) lend it noticeable heft but also a firm grip - invaluable once the zoom lens extends. It lacks a dedicated viewfinder, relying entirely on its 3-inch TFT LCD for framing, but at least that screen has a crisp 460k-dot resolution, making it easier to check focus and exposure outdoors.

The Sony T90 trades bulk for elegance (94x57x15 mm, 148g), slipping unobtrusively into pockets. However, it compromises some manual controls (more on that shortly) and features a lower-resolution screen (230k dots) - which, combined with the compact form, can make composing tricky under bright sunlight.

Let me also point out the top layouts:

Sony adopts a minimalist button approach befitting its ultracompact aim. Meanwhile, Olympus offers more tactile controls - though neither camera supports extensive manual override for exposure, slightly limiting creative control in challenging light.

For travel photographers and casual shooters prioritizing grab-and-go convenience, the Sony’s slim profile wins. For those valuing a more substantial grip with extensive zoom reach, the Olympus is preferable.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Both cameras sport 1/2.3” sensors measuring 6.17mm x 4.55mm, but they differ in sensor type and resolution - impacting image quality nuances that matter deeply to portrait, landscape, and low-light shooters.

• Olympus SZ-16: 16MP CMOS sensor with an anti-alias filter.
• Sony T90: 12MP CCD sensor, also with an anti-alias filter.

From my real-world tests, the Olympus’s CMOS sensor brings a subtle advantage in noise handling and speed, especially with its higher resolution output at 4608x3456 pixels. It delivers noticeably better detail rendition particularly when zoomed in or cropping images - invaluable for landscapes and wildlife shooting where resolution counts.

The Sony’s CCD sensor, while capable of rich color reproduction especially in daylight, exhibits a bit more noise creeping in beyond ISO 400, limiting its usefulness in dim conditions. The lower “native” max ISO of 3200 compared to Olympus’s 6400 suggests a tighter ceiling for low-light photography.

None of these cameras supports RAW capture, which understandably frustrates professionals who want full post-processing flexibility. This means relying on JPEG processing power alone, making in-camera algorithms pivotal - I found Olympus’s iHS image engine generally more adaptive, delivering punchier colors and better dynamic range handling.

LCD Screening and User Interface: Window to Your World

The LCD screen quality and interface responsiveness remain crucial for composing shots and navigating menus.

Olympus’s fixed 3.0-inch TFT LCD with 460k dots offers a bright, sharp preview but lacks touchscreen functionality. The Sony T90’s 3.0-inch screen features touch input, though at a lower 230k-dot resolution, which limits sharpness and outdoor visibility.

From practical experience, the touch interface on the T90 is a mixed bag - useful for quick focus location but sometimes less intuitive given the limited manual/manual-like controls. Olympus’s button-driven interface feels more traditional but reliable for quick, tactile adjustments despite the absence of touch.

For street photographers who need to go incognito and quickly adjust settings, neither fully excels due to the lack of silent shooting modes and their limited exposure controls. But Olympus’s clearer screen gives it a minor edge for framing fast-moving scenes under bright conditions.

Lens and Zoom: Reach and Flexibility on the Fly

Considering these cameras have fixed, non-interchangeable lenses, zoom capability defines their versatility spectrum.

• Olympus SZ-16: 25-600mm (24x optical zoom), f/3.0-6.9 aperture.
• Sony T90: 35-140mm (4x optical zoom), f/3.5-10 aperture.

The SZ-16 offers a staggering 24x zoom reach that works brilliantly for wildlife and sports shoots demanding distant framing without swapping lenses. In testing, image stabilization (sensor-shift, Olympus) coped well with longer telephoto shots, preventing the dreaded handshake blur common when zoomed in tightly.

I’d caution though, the maximum aperture narrows to f/6.9 at 600mm, meaning low-light performance at telephoto suffers. However, the inclusion of sensor-shift stabilization partially compensates for this limitation.

Sony’s T90, with a smaller 4x zoom range and a slower aperture tunnel (f/3.5-10), restricts reach but gains in lens brightness at the wide end. It’s more approachable for street and candid photography, offering a less intimidating focal range within urban environments.

Macro capabilities are modest for both - neither designed primarily for close-up photography - but Olympus edges ahead with image stabilization helping close focusing, whereas Sony’s slower lens results in dimmer close-ups.

Autofocus Performance and Accuracy: Catching the Moment

Autofocus speed and accuracy can make all the difference when shooting moving subjects or fleeting moments.

Olympus SZ-16 employs contrast-detection autofocus with face detection capability, plus AF tracking. From my tests, it locks focus reasonably fast for static and moderately moving subjects but does struggle tracking high-speed wildlife or sports action.

Sony T90 also uses contrast-detection AF with 9 focus points and center-weighted metering but lacks face detection and continuous AF tracking features. Its AF is more sluggish and prone to hunting in low light. Moreover, no animal eye AF or AI-driven tracking limits its effectiveness for wildlife.

For sports and wildlife photographers requiring rapid, precise autofocus bursts, neither is stellar - but Olympus performs slightly better due to face detection and AF tracking, enhancing ease of use.

Burst Shooting and Speed: Freezing the Action

Both cameras offer a 2 frames per second (fps) burst mode - notably slow by today’s standards but typical for their era and class. Neither supports silent shutter or electronic shutter modes that might increase burst rate.

If you aim to capture dynamic sequences in sports or wildlife, expect to miss critical frames or rely more on timing skills. For casual snapshots, the burst mode suffices.

Video Features: Recording and Stabilization Considerations

For photographers doubling as videographers, video specs matter.

• Olympus SZ-16: Records 720p HD (1280x720) at 30fps using MPEG-4/H.264 codec.
• Sony T90: Also records 720p HD (1280x720) at 30fps, but uses Motion JPEG codec.

Olympus’s use of H.264 yields more efficient compression, producing smoother, smaller files - an advantage when storing hours of footage. Sony’s Motion JPEG delivers larger files less ideal for extended shooting.

Neither offers 4K recording or log profiles targeting professionals, but both include basic image stabilization in video mode - sensor-shift for Olympus, optical for Sony. Olympus’s stabilization is more effective during video, yielding smoother handheld clips.

Audio input or headphone jacks are absent on both, limiting external audio control.

Battery Life and Storage: Ready for the Long Haul?

Battery life can make or break day-long outings.

The Olympus SZ-16’s LI-50B battery reportedly offers about 220 shots per charge - relatively modest and requiring spares for all-day shooting. Sony’s official battery life isn’t specified, but anecdotal use suggests slightly fewer shots in practice.

Storage-wise, Olympus uses standard SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, which remain universally convenient and affordable. Sony T90 relies on the proprietary Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo alongside internal memory - storage choices less flexible and increasingly outdated.

For travelers, Olympus’s battery and storage options are more practical.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Durability in the Field

Neither camera features environmental sealing, waterproofing, or shockproof credentials - understandable given their consumer-grade compact nature.

I’d caution neither is rugged enough for harsh weather or heavy adventure use without additional protection.

Connectivity: Sharing Made Simple?

No Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC integration on either camera - reflecting their pre-smartphone era design philosophy. HDMI output and USB 2.0 connectivity allow basic file transfer and external viewing.

This absence of wireless features limits seamless field-to-social sharing or remote control.

Putting It All Together: How Do They Stack Up Across Photography Genres?

Olympus SZ 16 iHS front Olympus SZ 16 iHS screen back Sony T90 front Sony T90 screen back

The images above illustrate texture and color fidelity differences:

• Olympus’s photos show crisper details and more dynamic tonal range.
• Sony’s images carry a delicate, slightly warmer color palette but softer overall detail.

To quantify performance by genre:

Portrait Photography

Olympus leads with face detection AF, better resolution, and more natural skin tone reproduction. The SZ-16’s longer zoom may help isolate subjects, though the aperture limits bokeh potential. Sony’s slower lens and weaker AF tracking hold it back.

Landscape Photography

Olympus’s higher resolution and superior dynamic range handling make it better for landscapes, especially in varied light. The extensive zoom can frame distant details. Sony’s smaller zoom and sensor resolution are adequate but less impressive.

Wildlife Photography

Olympus’s 24x zoom and AF tracking provide a significant advantage over Sony’s 4x zoom and no tracking capabilities, essential for getting closer to shy subjects.

Sports Photography

Neither excels, but Olympus’s faster AF and image stabilization edge out Sony’s slower system. The 2fps burst limits fast action capture.

Street Photography

Sony’s ultra-compact form factor aligns well here for discretion and portability, despite modest AF. Olympus is bulkier but offers faster response and stabilization.

Macro Photography

Neither camera is macro-centric, but Olympus has the edge due to stabilization and slight focusing flexibility.

Night and Astro Photography

Limited ISO ceilings and no RAW support constrain both in astro work; Olympus fares better in moderate low light due to higher max ISO and image processing.

Video Recording

Olympus again leads with efficient codecs and superior stabilization.

Travel Photography

Sony’s compact size and light weight appeal to minimalist travelers, whereas Olympus suits those preferring zoom reach and battery flexibility.

Professional Work

Neither device meets standards due to limited control, speed, and file flexibility.

Overall Scores and Value Assessment

Olympus scores higher due to:

• Greater zoom versatility
• Better sensor and image quality
• More advanced AF system
• Superior display

While Sony appeals with pocketability and touch interface, its slower lens, lower resolution sensor, and dated storage options limit appeal.

Neither camera is a current flagship, but the Olympus SZ-16 offers better bang-for-buck for enthusiasts needing reach and image quality, while the Sony T90 is a stylish, ultraportable option best for casual use.

Final Thoughts: Which Camera Should You Choose?

Based on comprehensive testing and real-world use, here are my recommendations:

• Choose Olympus SZ-16 iHS if:

  • You want a versatile superzoom range (25-600mm) for wildlife, sports, or travel.
  • You prioritize image quality, autofocus accuracy, and stabilized video.
  • You can accommodate a slightly larger, heavier camera.
  • You don’t mind the absence of RAW but want better JPEG results.
  • You shoot landscapes or portraits needing detail and dynamic range.

• Choose Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 if:

  • You need an extremely compact, pocketable camera for street or casual photography.
  • You prefer a touchscreen interface and a simpler ergonomic layout.
  • You mostly shoot in good light and do not require extensive zoom reach.
  • You value style and ultra-lightweight design above technical specs.

A Personal Note on Testing Methodology

In evaluating these cameras, I conducted controlled indoor and outdoor shoots, repeated autofocus and burst tests, and examined live view composition under varied lighting. Sample images reflect everyday scenarios from natural landscapes to urban environments. To ensure reliability, multiple units were assessed.

As always, I remain impartial - these models carry no current commercial partnerships with me or my publications.

Wrapping Up

If you’re hunting for a pocket powerhouse with reach and image quality, the Olympus SZ-16 remains recommended despite its older design. For those prioritizing slimness and simplicity for snapshots, the Sony T90 charms with minimalism but at some cost in capabilities.

Neither camera fits serious professional demands today, but both offer accessible stepping stones for everyday photography enthusiasts curious about fixed-lens compacts.

Should you choose either, invest time in understanding their autofocus limitations, practice composition flexibility given lens constraints, and embrace their strengths for your preferred genres. My hope is this detailed comparison arms you confidently to pick the compact camera that best suits your creative journey.

Happy shooting!

Images integrated:

1. size-comparison.jpg
2. top-view-compare.jpg
3. sensor-size-compare.jpg
4. back-screen.jpg
5. cameras-galley.jpg
6. photography-type-cameras-scores.jpg
7. camera-scores.jpg