Olympus 550WP vs Olympus TG-4
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Other Name is mju 550WP
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced April 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus 550WP and Olympus TG-4, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the 550WP (10MP) and TG-4 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 550WP was revealed 7 years earlier than the TG-4 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a simple view of how the 550WP matches up versus the TG-4 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 550WP & Olympus Tough TG-4. The full galleries are available at Olympus 550WP Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Olympus TG-4
550WP | TG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus 550WP
TG-4 | 550WP | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2015 | January 2009 | Newer by 76 months | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 550WP and Olympus TG-4
550WP | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 550WP comes with physical dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Olympus 550WP and Olympus TG-4 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the 550WP vs the TG-4.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 550WP and TG-4 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions just by researching specs. The pic underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 550WP and TG-4.
All in all, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-4 to render greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged 550WP will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 550WP | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus 550WP | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Otherwise known as | mju 550WP | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-01-07 | 2015-04-13 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.0 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 167g (0.37 pounds) | 247g (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $399 | $379 |