Olympus Stylus 7010 vs Samsung SL820: An Expert's Deep Dive into Mid-Degree Compact Cameras

When stepping into the compact camera arena of the late 2000s, two contenders matured in subtle but meaningful ways: Olympus’s Stylus 7010 (also known as the mju 7010) and Samsung’s SL820 (aka IT100). Both debuted in 2009, targeting the snapshot enthusiast who demanded pocketability yet yearned for versatility beyond the average point-and-shoot. Decades of hands-on experience placing cameras under my scrutinizing gaze prepare me to deliver a frank and nuanced comparison between these two modestly specced compacts.

This is not just a specs sheet reading exercise. Instead, I’ll interweave my firsthand testing experiences, backed by technical analysis, to help you decide if either of these small sensor cameras merits your attention in today’s crowded used market - or perhaps just curiosities to admire from a safe photographic distance.

Let’s unpack the details.

Putting Size and Handling Under the Microscope

Camera handling can make or break your shooting experience. Olympus and Samsung opted for compact, pocketable bodies with fixed lenses, but subtle differences shape how they feel in hand.

Comparing the Olympus 7010 to the Samsung SL820, the Olympus measures 98x56x26 mm weighing a featherlight 145 grams; the Samsung is slightly chunkier at 95x59x23 mm and heavier at 168 grams. Both wield similar footprints, but the Olympus’s slightly taller and slimmer build felt more natural to grasp, especially during extended shooting sessions. Its subtly textured grip bristles with just enough tactility to prevent slipping without overstating its presence.

The Samsung’s body offers a bit more girth but a flatter grip zone - fine for brief snaps, less so for sustained use. I often found my fingers sliding off when shooting in one-handed fashion. Oddly, the Samsung’s heavier weight could tip the scales toward sturdiness, but the plastic finish felt less confident, leading to a more fragile impression.

Ergonomically, these small sensor compacts can’t compete with larger APS-C systems, but for casual day trips or street strolls, both succeed in portability. Personal preference leans toward the Olympus here, but it’s a close call.

Control Design and User Interface: Are They Intuitive?

Anyone who has tossed around countless compacts knows that control layouts can make or break even the best specs. Olympus and Samsung took different approaches worth contrasting.

Olympus stylized the 7010 with a clean top deck: a rounded shutter button and a dedicated on/off switch, flanked by a modest mode dial on the rear paired with a 2.7-inch fixed LCD screen. The absence of a viewfinder is a sign of its era, but the live view-only interface was responsive enough for casual framing. The inclusion of optical zoom lever alongside the shutter felt natural.

Samsung’s SL820 sports a slightly larger 3-inch LCD but repeated the live view–only design choice. Its control cluster is simplified, featuring a round shutter button and no dedicated mode dial - menu diving was necessary to switch shooting modes, which added a layer of friction.

In practice, the Olympus felt a little more photographer-oriented, with tactile buttons positioned to minimize fumbling. The Samsung’s menu depth and fewer physical knobs kept it lightweight but less intuitive for real-time adjustments - something that might frustrate action shooters or those used to quick controls.

Neither camera offers touchscreen input - a standard not yet ubiquitous in 2009 - so all navigations required manual button presses and dials.

Sensor and Image Quality: A Surprisingly Even Playing Field

On paper, both cameras share a 12-megapixel 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor with dimensions of 6.08x4.56 mm (≈27.7 mm² sensor area). Despite sharing similar raw specs, sensor design nuances and image processors shape final image quality.

Both Olympus and Samsung employ CCD sensors - not CMOS - with the Olympus using the TruePic III image processor while Samsung’s processor isn't explicitly documented, but likely a proprietary variant.

CCD sensors of this size notoriously struggle with high noise levels above ISO 400. In real-world shooting, both cameras perform best at their base ISOs (64 for Olympus, 80 for Samsung), yielding clean images with rich color fidelity and contrast suitable for prints up to 8x10 inches. The Olympus’s slightly lower base ISO theoretically allows for marginally cleaner shadows.

Dynamic range hovers around 9 stops, typical for 1/2.3" CCDs, limiting highlight recovery, particularly in tricky lighting (e.g., harsh midday sun or deep shadows). Color rendering on the Olympus leaned towards cooler, more neutral tones, while Samsung’s output trends warmer and more saturated - personal preference will play a role here.

The Olympus’s sensor enables a maximum resolution of 3968x2976 pixels, whereas the Samsung captures slightly larger 4000x3000 images. The difference is marginal in practical prints but offers a hair more cropping flexibility for the Samsung.

Noise control and sharpening strategies differ; the Olympus applies mild in-camera noise reduction preserving detail, while Samsung’s images sometimes felt overprocessed with edge halos in high contrast zones.

Bottom line: image quality differences are subtle, though Olympus’s processor edges out slightly cleaner low ISO files, while Samsung’s JPEGs pop with vivid colors.

Viewing and Composing: LCD Quality and Usability

Screen size and resolution are critical, especially given both cameras lack an optical or electronic viewfinder.

Samsung’s SL820 sports a larger 3.0-inch LCD, though at approximately 230K dots, resolution is average for compact cameras of its time, rendering images and menus with fair clarity. I appreciated the real estate for framing but noticed under daylight, reflections and glare could obscure screen details.

Olympus opts for the smaller 2.7-inch LCD, matching the same 230K dot resolution. The smaller screen sacrifices some ease in composing but typically rendered sharp images in shadows or moderate light.

Neither display excels in touchscreen capabilities or brightness adaptability, so both cameras require care when composing outdoors in bright environments. It’s worth noting that touchscreen filtering, now common, was barely emerging then - adjusting focus and exposure had to be done via physical buttons.

Autofocus Systems Put to the Test

As a seasoned reviewer, I always run autofocus through real-world drills - focus acquisition speed, accuracy, and tracking performance under duress - to separate marketing fluff from reality.

The Olympus 7010 uses a basic contrast-detection autofocus system without any face detection or autofocus tracking capabilities. It provides a single AF mode centered in the frame, suitable for stationary subjects in good light. Macro focusing performs competently starting from 10 cm, which is respectable for compact cameras in this era.

Samsung SL820 offers a more sophisticated AF array, combining contrast-detection with face detection and multiple focus areas selectable by the user. This system was notably more versatile in tracking faces, providing a practical advantage in casual portraiture or dynamic street scenes. Its closer macro focusing distance - 5 cm - means it can get nearer to your subject, enhancing close-up shooting possibilities.

However, both models lack continuous autofocus, which severely limits performance in fast action scenes like sports or wildlife. AF speed was average; neither camera impressed chasing a moving subject in low light or cluttered backgrounds. Expect some hunting and backtracking when using under challenging conditions.

Overall, Samsung’s autofocus system feels ahead of Olympus’s here, particularly for portraits and casual snapshots with multiple subjects.

Lens and Zoom: What’s in Your Frame?

No interchangeable lenses here, predictably, but the fixed zoom lenses offer useful flexibility for day-to-day use.

Olympus’s 7010 boasts a 28-196 mm equivalent 7x zoom lens (F3.0-5.9), a notable reach for a compact. The extended telephoto range impresses in wildlife and scenic crops, assuming sufficient light and steadiness. Optical image stabilization (sensor-shift) present in the Olympus helps mitigate shake at longer focal lengths, a significant plus given the camera's high zoom ratio.

Samsung’s SL820 has a shorter 28-140 mm equivalent 5x zoom (F3.4-5.8) and curiously omits optical image stabilization. The absence of stabilization is rather glaring, especially with telephoto photography, where hand shake readily degrades sharpness. The slightly wider minimum macro focusing distance (5cm) does broaden shooting options, but overall telephoto reach is more limited.

Zoom lens sharpness across both cameras softens noticeably near the telephoto end - with Olympus’s stabilization partially rescuing handheld softness. Wide-angle edges suffer typical barrel distortion, albeit correctable in post - if you’re willing to mess with a computer.

If you prioritize reach, Olympus is your pick, especially given the advantage of built-in image stabilization.

Burst Shooting, Shutter Range, and Exposure Modes

Neither Olympus 7010 nor Samsung SL820 cater to the enthusiast shooting fast action. Both offer a shutter speed range roughly spanning 4–1/2000 sec (Olympus) and 8–1/1500 sec (Samsung). These ranges suffice for everyday photography but won’t freeze ultra-fast sports or wildlife motion crisply.

Neither supports shutter priority, aperture priority, or manual exposure modes - limiting creative control to presets and automatic settings. Exposure compensation and bracketing are also absent. In practice, the cameras operate as straightforward point-and-shoots, so advanced photographers must temper expectations.

As for burst rates, neither camera supports continuous shooting modes beyond the minimal. If you need to capture decisive moments or rapid shooting sequences, look elsewhere.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Can They Survive Your Adventures?

Both cameras follow the typical consumer compact design without special weather sealing. Neither is waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, or freezeproof.

For casual travel, these cameras are sufficiently robust, but they are not rugged companions for harsh environments like hiking storms or sandy beaches. Their plastic bodies reduce weight but can feel fragile when jostled aggressively.

Battery Life and Storage: When Will You Need to Recharge?

Olympus 7010 uses the LI-42B battery, similar in capacity to many compact camera cells, delivering approximately 240 shots per charge under normal use. Samsung SL820’s SLB-10A battery offers slightly better endurance, hovering near 300 shots per charge according to official specs.

In real-world tests, battery drain hinges heavily on screen use and flash. Neither camera supports USB charging - a modern convenience absent here - so carrying spare batteries is wise for extended shoots.

Olympus uses xD Picture Card or microSD storage, while Samsung supports SD/SDHC/MMC cards. Given that xD cards have long been discontinued and microSD cards typically carry lower write speeds, Samsung’s SD card compatibility wins here for modern usability and storage flexibility.

Video Recording Capabilities: Modest by Today’s Standards

If moving images matter to you, Samsung’s SL820 brings more to the table. Its maximum video resolution of 1280x720 HD at 30 fps impressively beats the Olympus’s paltry 640x480 VGA recording. Both produce Motion JPEG files, which isn’t very efficient but was common for compacts in this period.

Neither camera offers microphone or headphone ports - recorded sound is mono via built-in mics and of limited quality. Neither supports optical stabilization in video (since Samsung lacks OIS altogether), meaning handheld videos suffer from shake, especially at telephoto zooms.

In short, Samsung SL820 is the better all-around multimedia performer, but don’t expect cinematic movie quality.

Practical Performance across Photography Genres

Let’s talk specifics - how do these cameras fare in diverse situations? Based on my test shooting and comparative evaluations, here are the highlights:

• Portrait Photography: Samsung’s more advanced AF with face detection helps lock focus on facial features more reliably. However, neither camera generates beautiful bokeh given their small sensors and fixed lens apertures (F3.0-F5.9). Skin tones are fairly pleasant on both, with Samsung leaning warmer and Olympus cooler. Neither supports eye autofocus.

• Landscape Photography: Both sensors deliver modest dynamic range and resolution. Olympus’s longer zoom helps reach distant scenes. Neither camera features weather sealing, but compact form helps discreet shooting outdoors.

• Wildlife Photography: The Olympus’s 7x zoom and image stabilization present an edge to get closer shots without a teleconverter. However, sluggish AF in both limits fast-action capture. Samsung’s shorter zoom and lack of stabilization hinder reach and image sharpness at distance.

• Sports Photography: Neither camera is suitable for sports due to slow AF, lack of burst modes, small shutters speed range, and no exposure modes beyond auto.

• Street Photography: Both small and quiet, these cameras fit discreet urban shooting. Samsung’s face detection offers advantages for focusing on people candidly. Olympus's more manageable ergonomics aid spontaneous shooting.

• Macro Photography: Samsung’s closer 5 cm macro focusing distance spells opportunity for detailed close-ups. Olympus’s 10 cm minimum distance is less versatile macro-wise but bolstered by sensor-shift stabilization.

• Night / Astro Photography: Both cameras max out at ISO 1600 but suffer significant noise and limited exposure control. Long exposures are capped due to max shutter speed limits and no manual exposure modes, so astro shooters will be frustrated.

• Video Use: Samsung SL820 offers superior HD video at 720p, while Olympus maxes out at VGA. Neither impress with audio or stabilization.

• Travel Photography: Portability favors Olympus's lighter build and longer zoom; Samsung’s better screen size and video tilt its scales. Battery life is a tie; lens versatility and stabilization elevate Olympus for travel enthusiasts.

• Professional Work: Neither support RAW capture, manual exposure, or tethering, curtailing professional workflow integration. They serve best as backups or casual cameras.

Olympus 7010 front Olympus 7010 screen back Samsung SL820 front Samsung SL820 screen back

Connectivity and Modern Conveniences

No surprises here: neither camera boasts wireless features such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC that have become industry standard since. USB 2.0 connections allow basic data transfer, but slow by modern measures.

Neither offers GPS geotagging. In 2009 this wasn’t uncommon, but it highlights their dated nature in today’s connectivity-focused market.

Overall Performance and Score Breakdown

After putting these machines through their paces, here’s an evidence-based evaluation:

Olympus 7010 stands out for:

• Portability and ergonomics
• Longer zoom reach with OIS
• Slightly better image quality at base ISO

While Samsung SL820 shines in:

• Autofocus capabilities (face detection, multi-area)
• Larger, easier-to-view LCD screen
• Higher resolution HD video recording

Genre-Specific Scoring: Which Compact Excels Where?

Here’s a snapshot of scoring differentiated by photographic discipline, helping you pinpoint suitability:

Olympus leads in telephoto-oriented disciplines like wildlife and travel owing to OIS and zoom range. Samsung bests Olympus for portraits and video thanks to smarter AF and HD video.

Neither camera is recommended for fast-action or professional use due to systemic limitations.

Price-to-Performance and Final Recommendations

Used today, Olympus 7010 tends to trade at lower prices (~$200), whereas the Samsung SL820 commands a modest premium (~$280). Given both are aging compacts, their value is judged strictly on nostalgia or backup casual use.

If you seek a simple, travel-friendly camera with respectable zoom and stabilization, Olympus 7010 is a modest winner. Its lighter weight and more substantial focal reach offer practical advantages.

Samsung SL820 appeals more to portrait lovers seeking face detection AF and HD video. Its improved autofocus system gels better with social event shooting.

For enthusiasts or semi-professionals, neither supersedes a modern mirrorless or smartphone in versatility, speed, or image quality. But for collectors or hobbyists nostalgic for early digital compacts with distinct personalities, these two cameras merit their moments.

Parting Shots: Which One Should You Pick?

• Choose Olympus Stylus 7010 if: You want a lightweight compact with excellent zoom reach and sensor-shift image stabilization for steady shots in travel and wildlife; you can live with VGA video and rudimentary AF.

• Choose Samsung SL820 if: You prefer smarter autofocus with face detection, a larger viewing screen, and HD video capabilities, better suited to portraits and casual social photography.

• Avoid both if: You demand advanced photography controls, RAW capability, fast autofocus for action, or robust video/audio features.

If today’s compact camera landscape entices you more toward smart features, serious low light, or 4K video - consider newer models or flagship mirrorless gear. But if you’re after a snapshot camera with character reflecting the state of digital compacts a decade-plus ago - either Olympus or Samsung will serve you fine, each with its distinct quirks and charms.

In closing, trust your hands and eyes: test these classics yourself if you get the chance. While modern tech leaps far ahead, the joy of analog-style shooting with simple but capable machines never truly fades.

Happy shooting!