Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-2
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cd55/6cd55e755b246a73ebaa42d5216b8beb3a328143" alt="Olympus Stylus 9000 front Olympus Stylus 9000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac7d4/ac7d4b646d82f72e1235bc9a541f3ccc1d146b3c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-2 front Olympus Stylus SH-2 front"
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Also referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-1
- Replacement is Olympus SH-3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus 9000 and Olympus SH-2, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and SH-2 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The 9000 was brought out 6 years before the SH-2 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the 9000 scores against the SH-2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Olympus Stylus SH-2. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus SH-2
9000 | SH-2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus 9000
SH-2 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2015 | ![]() | May 2009 | More recent by 70 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Olympus SH-2
9000 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus 9000 provides outside dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Olympus SH-2 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 9000 and Olympus SH-2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the 9000 compared to the SH-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78777/78777b8be19ccdd0dfcff06e52b16214140e4503" alt="Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and SH-2 is 92 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56713/567139548fa32517574daa2c2de539e24e827845" alt="Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by reviewing technical specs. The graphic below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and SH-2.
As you can tell, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus SH-2 to offer extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1faf/c1faf8b08858dd19e71d242f6903a5e96a25758d" alt="Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d568/9d5686e7d302de5b05b57365f524936b4d99b095" alt="Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
Also called as | mju 9000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2015-03-11 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 11.5 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 lb) | 271g (0.60 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $300 | $399 |