Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-320
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is very close and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 9000 was launched 3 years prior to the TG-320 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the 9000 scores against the TG-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus TG-320
9000 | TG-320 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus 9000
TG-320 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | May 2009 | Newer by 32 months |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Olympus TG-320
9000 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal display sizing | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 9000 comes with external measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the 9000 compared to the TG-320.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and TG-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specifications. The pic below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and TG-320.
Plainly, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-320 to render more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged 9000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus TG-320 |
Also referred to as | mju 9000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 150 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $0 |