Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS1
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
91 Imaging
33 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Announced May 2009
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ6
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS1 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic ZS1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the ZS1 (10MP) is fairly close but the 9000 (1/2.3") and ZS1 (1/2.5") boast different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 9000 was launched about the same time to the ZS1 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summary of how the 9000 scores vs the ZS1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Panasonic ZS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic ZS1
| 9000 | ZS1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS1 over the Olympus 9000
| ZS1 | 9000 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic ZS1
| 9000 | ZS1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2009 |  | May 2009 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal display measurement |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus 9000 has exterior measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS1 has sizing of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic ZS1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the 9000 versus the ZS1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and ZS1 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through a spec sheet. The image underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and ZS1.
Clearly, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The 9000 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus 9000 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 |
| Otherwise known as | mju 9000 | Lumix DMC-TZ6 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-05-14 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) | 229 gr (0.50 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $0 |
