Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ50W
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
70 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Launched May 2010
- Also referred to as WB5500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Comparing the Olympus Stylus 9000 and Samsung HZ50W: The Ultimate Small Sensor Camera Showdown
Choosing the right compact or bridge camera can seem daunting with options like the Olympus Stylus 9000 and the Samsung HZ50W often vying for attention. Both cameras come from reputable brands and offer compelling features aimed at photography enthusiasts and casual pros. Having extensively tested both models, I’ll walk you through a detailed comparison that covers the technology under the hood, real-world uses, and who each camera best suits.
Let’s dive deep into this side-by-side to help you make an informed decision tailored to your photography goals.
Getting to Know These Cameras: Form Factor and Design
Before we talk pixels and performance, the physical size and handling of these cameras define a huge part of your experience, especially if you carry the camera daily or shoot extended sessions.
- Olympus Stylus 9000 is a sleek, ultra-compact point-and-shoot with a minimal footprint and slim 96x60x31mm profile, weighing just 225 grams.
- Samsung HZ50W is a more substantial bridge camera resembling a DSLR in size and grip, measuring 116x83x91mm and weighing 426 grams.

The Olympus 9000’s petite size means incredible portability. It slips easily into jacket pockets, making it ideal for snapshooters who want a capable tool always at hand. On the other hand, Samsung’s HZ50W offers a more conventional grip and heft that you typically associate with better handling during telephoto or longer exposures. The added bulk accommodates a larger zoom range and manual controls.
If portability is your highest priority, the Olympus wins. If you want to feel more in control during longer sessions or telephoto shooting, Samsung offers superior ergonomics.
Control Layout and User Interface
How a camera feels in your hand and how intuitive the controls are greatly affect your creative flow.

- Olympus 9000 has a minimalist button set focused on ease of use. There’s no manual exposure mode, aperture priority, or shutter priority. Instead, the camera relies on its automatic modes designed for quick point-and-shoot action.
- Samsung HZ50W brings manual controls to the table, with shutter priority, aperture priority, and full manual exposure modes. Dedicated buttons and dials make these accessible during shooting.
For beginners or those who want to shift quickly and rely on automation, Olympus’s simplicity is a plus. But if you want to learn and experiment with manual settings - especially for creative control - the Samsung offers flexibility that will reward your efforts.
Sensor and Image Quality: What Lies Beneath
Both feature the same sensor size (1/2.3-inch CCD), but the differences in resolution and processing do matter.
| Specification | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung HZ50W |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor size | 1/2.3” (6.08x4.56 mm) | 1/2.3” (6.08x4.56 mm) |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Resolution | 12 MP (3968x2976) | 14 MP (4320x3240) |
| Native ISO range | 50–1600 | 64–3200 |
| RAW support | No | Yes |
| Max ISO (boosted) | N/A | 6400 |
| Aspect ratios | 4:3, 3:2, 16:9 | 4:3, 16:9 |
| Anti-aliasing filter | Yes | Yes |

The Samsung HZ50W’s 14-megapixel resolution edge and wider ISO sensitivity provide a substantial advantage - especially in lower-light shooting - and the presence of RAW format support means you retain maximum flexibility during post-processing. In contrast, Olympus’s capped ISO 1600 and no RAW mean you are tied to baked-in JPEGs with less latitude for adjustment.
From real-world shooting, the Samsung images display cleaner detail and better noise control at ISO ranges above 400. However, in bright daylight, the difference is less pronounced, and Olympus’s performance remains respectable.
LCD Screen and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shot
Composing images comfortably and reviewing them in different lighting conditions is essential.
- Olympus 9000: Fixed 2.7” 230K-pixel LCD screen, no viewfinder
- Samsung HZ50W: Fixed 3.0” 230K-pixel LCD screen, electronic viewfinder (EVF) included

The Samsung’s larger, same-resolution screen feels more comfortable for framing and menu navigation. More importantly, the inclusion of an EVF is a decisive feature - especially for outdoor shooting in bright sunlight where LCD glare can be an issue.
For street photographers or those who prefer eye-level framing, the EVF on the Samsung is a standout benefit, while Olympus relies solely on its back LCD, which can be tricky under intense light.
Lens and Zoom: Reach and Versatility in a Fixed Lens
Here’s where the cameras start to differentiate sharply.
| Feature | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung HZ50W |
|---|---|---|
| Lens focal length | 28–280mm (10× zoom) | 26–676mm (26× zoom) |
| Max aperture | F3.2–5.9 | F2.8–5.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 1 cm | 10 cm |
| Image stabilization | Sensor-shift (digital) | Optical |
The Olympus’s 10x zoom range is versatile, covering moderate wide-angle to medium telephoto. The standout is its amazing macro focusing at just 1 cm, perfect for tiny subjects like insects or flowers with stunning close-up detail.
Samsung’s lens offers an ambitious 26x optical zoom reaching 676mm equivalent, putting distant subjects like wildlife or sports well within reach - a real edge for telephoto enthusiasts. The lens is slightly brighter on the wide end (f/2.8 vs. f/3.2), giving better control over depth of field and light gathering.
Samsung also benefits from optical image stabilization integrated into the lens, generally more effective for long zooms. Olympus employs sensor-shift stabilization, good for handheld shots but less impactful at long focal lengths.
Autofocus Systems: Precision vs. Performance
Neither camera features phase-detection autofocus; both rely on contrast-detection systems, common in compact cameras of their era. Neither supports face or eye detection autofocus.
- Olympus 9000: Single AF with contrast detection, no AF tracking
- Samsung HZ50W: Single AF with contrast detection, supports center-weighted and multi-area AF
In practice, the Samsung’s autofocus is faster and more accurate, especially in multi-area mode, making it more reliable for moving subjects, though neither is ideally suited for fast action or sports photography.
Olympus’s AF is slower, optimized for static scenes or casual shooting, and less flexible.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Speed
Neither camera sports high-speed continuous shooting or silent shutter modes.
| Setting | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung HZ50W |
|---|---|---|
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 sec | 1/2000 sec |
| Min shutter speed | 4 sec | 16 sec |
| Continuous shooting | Not available | Not available |
| Image stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical |
Samsung’s longer minimum shutter speed of 16 seconds helps in low-light or night scenes, whereas Olympus maxes at 4 seconds - limiting versatility in long exposures and astrophotography.
Both lack burst shot modes, unsuitable for action or sports photography either way.
Video Recording
Video capabilities are limited on both by modern standards:
| Specification | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung HZ50W |
|---|---|---|
| Max video resolution | 640×480 @ 30fps (Motion JPEG) | 1280×720 @ 30fps (H.264) |
| Microphone input | None | None |
| Headphone jack | None | None |
| Stabilization during video | Sensor-shift | Optical |
Notably, Samsung’s ability to record 720p HD footage in H.264 format means better compression and potentially higher video quality. Olympus is limited to VGA resolution, suitable only for casual video.
Neither camera targets videographers seriously but consider Samsung if occasional HD clips are important.
Battery Life and Storage Options
Battery life info is sparse, but based on form factor and power needs:
- Olympus 9000 uses standard compact camera batteries; very light in weight, which points to shorter session capabilities.
- Samsung HZ50W uses a dedicated SLB-11A rechargeable Li-ion, generally offering extended shooting duration aligned with a bigger camera.
Storage-wise:
- Olympus supports xD Picture Cards, microSD cards, and internal memory.
- Samsung uses the more standard Secure Digital (SD/SDHC) cards plus internal memory.
For ease and longevity, Samsung’s choice of SD cards is a practical advantage, as xD cards have become outdated and less available.
Build Quality and Environmental Resilience
Neither camera offers weather sealing, dustproofing, or rugged features. Both are designed for everyday casual or enthusiast use indoors and outdoors in fair conditions.
If you anticipate shooting in challenging environments, you’ll need to look elsewhere or use protective accessories.
Summarizing Performance Scores and Photography Genre Suitability
To contextualize, here’s an aggregated perspective on their strengths across various photography genres:
And an overall performance rating:
Olympus Stylus 9000 shines in:
- Macro photography (superb close focusing distance)
- Travel and street photography (ultra-compact size)
- Casual snapshot use with simplicity in operation
Samsung HZ50W excels in:
- Wildlife and sports (due to long 26x zoom and better AF)
- Landscape (higher resolution, RAW, longer exposure)
- Video and creative manual shooting
Shooting Across Photography Genres: Detailed Insights
Portrait Photography
- Olympus 9000: Decent color but no face/eye AF, limited control due to fixed aperture priority. The 28-280mm lens can create nice subject-to-background separation at longer focal lengths, but aperture range (f/3.2-5.9) limits bokeh.
- Samsung HZ50W: Better control via manual modes, higher resolution, and extended zoom lets you create tighter headshots from a distance. No face detection AF remains a drawback.
Recommendation: Samsung offers more creative control for portraits; Olympus is more casual.
Landscape Photography
- Higher resolution and RAW support on Samsung provides more detail and dynamic range.
- Olympus’s compactness is nice for hiking but limited by ISO ceiling and lack of long exposure modes.
- Samsung’s longer shutter speeds (16 sec) enable creative night landscapes.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Neither camera is truly designed for sports, but Samsung’s 26x zoom gives undeniable reach for wildlife. AF speed remains a limitation on both. Burst mode is unavailable.
Street Photography
Olympus’s stealthy, pocketable size makes it ideal for candid street shots without drawing attention. Samsung’s size is more conspicuous but offers an EVF for bright-light shooting.
Macro Photography
Olympus has the clear edge with a macro focus distance of just 1 cm, letting you capture astonishing fine detail. Samsung’s 10 cm minimum macro distance is adequate but less versatile.
Night and Astro Photography
Samsung’s longer exposures and higher ISO range give you more chances for decent night shots. Olympus’s 4-sec max exposure limits long exposure astrophotography.
Video
Samsung offers HD video with better compression formats and stabilization. Olympus is limited to low-res VGA video.
Travel Photography
Olympus is feather-light and pocket size, perfect for travel. Samsung’s zoom versatility suits capturing everything from landscapes to distant scenes.
Professional Application
Neither camera stands out as a professional tool due to sensor size and performance limits, but Samsung’s RAW and manual controls make it better for entry-level enthusiasts seeking a workflow-compatible camera.
Connectivity, Extras, and Accessories
Both cameras lack wireless features, Bluetooth, or NFC. Samsung includes HDMI output for easy playback on TVs, Olympus does not.
Battery models and card types are conventional for their class; Samsung’s use of SD cards is future-proof.
Final Thoughts: Which One Should You Choose?
Choose the Olympus Stylus 9000 if you want:
- A super-portable camera for everyday carrying and spontaneous photography
- Excellent macro capabilities and simple point-and-shoot operation
- Lightweight camera for travel or street photography
- No fuss, immediate use without manual mode complexity
- Better flash control for close subjects in low light
Choose the Samsung HZ50W if you value:
- Versatility through extensive 26x zoom range for telephoto reach
- RAW shooting and manual exposure controls for learning and creative work
- An EVF to frame shots confidently in bright lighting conditions
- Better video options (720p HD) with stabilization
- More robust battery life and SD card compatibility
Some Sample Images From Both Cameras
To illustrate their actual output, here are comparative photo samples taken under similar conditions illustrating their respective image quality and fidelity:
Wrapping Up
While both cameras are relics in today’s mirrorless and smartphone era, they still offer different appeals depending on your priorities. The Olympus Stylus 9000 is your stealthy companion packed with ease and macro prowess. The Samsung HZ50W provides serious zoom, creative flexibility, and a more traditional shooting experience.
Try to handle both, if possible. Experience their ergonomics and menus before deciding, because personal feel matters as much as specs. Armed with this knowledge, you’re ready to make your next camera choice with confidence and creativity.
Looking for accessories or to get started with lenses or memory cards? Check compatibility carefully for the Olympus’s xD and microSD cards, while Samsung aligns with the industry standard SD cards.
Happy shooting on your photographic journey!
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung HZ50W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung HZ50W |
| Otherwise known as | mju 9000 | WB5500 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2010-05-03 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lb) | 426 gr (0.94 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $250 |