Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX350
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
62 Imaging
46 Features
51 Overall
48
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Revealed December 2016
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX350 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX350, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and HX350 (20MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 9000 was brought out 8 years earlier than the HX350 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the 9000 matches up versus the HX350 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX350 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Sony HX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony HX350
9000 | HX350 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Olympus 9000
HX350 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2016 | May 2009 | Newer by 92 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony HX350
9000 | HX350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 comes with outside measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony HX350 has specifications of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX350 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the 9000 versus the HX350.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and HX350 is 92 and 62 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through technical specs. The picture here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and HX350.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Sony HX350 to render more detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged 9000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX350 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
Other name | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2016-12-20 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 202 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) | 652 gr (1.44 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $300 | - |