Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/022ed/022ed39c86a4f12fb37f0ee7bf73ec9c47fc264c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-1 front Olympus Stylus SH-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a155e/a155e32ab76bd18f46a3b00fd477c4639517dbc2" alt="Ricoh WG-5 GPS front Ricoh WG-5 GPS front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2014
- Newer Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Launched February 2015
- Older Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- New Model is Ricoh WG-6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the SH-1 (16MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The SH-1 was launched 10 months earlier than the WG-5 GPS which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the SH-1 matches up against the WG-5 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-1 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-1 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
SH-1 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus SH-1
WG-5 GPS | SH-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | March 2014 | Fresher by 10 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SH-1 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
SH-1 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-1 comes with outside dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the SH-1 and the WG-5 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88d23/88d2330bad45340976509525c2abe2a483c9133c" alt="Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SH-1 and WG-5 GPS is 88 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e1f3/6e1f3ce192c988f1db017ba683ba1b8946b15167" alt="Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-1 and WG-5 GPS.
As you can see, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of files though you really should factor the release date of the products into consideration. The older SH-1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18c62/18c62ce0d4d5e8659e0d1cf2c4c1eea2a3e9e81d" alt="Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb7e1/bb7e1f12d482de23ff81b82b03516c38efad6135" alt="Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2014-03-31 | 2015-02-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271g (0.60 pounds) | 236g (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 shots | 240 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $349 | $500 |