Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-50
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2015
- Old Model is Olympus SH-1
- Renewed by Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SH-2 (16MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is pretty similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe SH-2 was released 3 years earlier than the WG-50 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the SH-2 scores vs the WG-50 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Ricoh WG-50. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Ricoh WG-50
SH-2 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus SH-2
WG-50 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2017 | March 2015 | Newer by 26 months | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Ricoh WG-50
SH-2 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-2 comes with outer measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-50 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the SH-2 versus the WG-50.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-2 and WG-50 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading technical specs. The image below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-2 and WG-50.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution and you can expect similar quality of pictures though you would want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The more aged SH-2 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2015-03-11 | 2017-05-24 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.5fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271g (0.60 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | 300 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $399 | $280 |