Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VG-160
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
96 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Older Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus VG-160, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both built by Olympus. The resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SH-3 was released 4 years after the VG-160 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the SH-3 grades versus the VG-160 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SH-3 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus VG-160
| SH-3 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 50 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus SH-3
| VG-160 | SH-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus VG-160
| SH-3 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-3 enjoys physical dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus VG-160 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the SH-3 versus the VG-160.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SH-3 and VG-160 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes simply by going through specifications. The image below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-3 and VG-160.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus SH-3 to provide more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more modern SH-3 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2016-02-08 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.5 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271g (0.60 lb) | 125g (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | 165 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $579 | $90 |
