Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX90
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc5a2/dc5a23e639490cb05b989f13eba4ea99bfc355d5" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 149g - 102 x 56 x 22mm
- Revealed August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX90 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus SH-3 versus Panasonic FX90, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and FX90 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The SH-3 was unveiled 4 years after the FX90 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple view of how the SH-3 matches up vs the FX90 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX90 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Panasonic FX90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Panasonic FX90
SH-3 | FX90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | ![]() | August 2011 | More modern by 55 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX90 over the Olympus SH-3
FX90 | SH-3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic FX90
SH-3 | FX90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX90 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-3 has got outer dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Panasonic FX90 has proportions of 102mm x 56mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SH-3 versus Panasonic FX90 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the SH-3 and the FX90.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbd41/fbd41152a7ee6421bd084f90cc0b94dcc897bfc1" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX90 size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX90 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-3 and FX90 is 88 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95d3a/95d3a687ec0f40e6ed965e0e9d7833ff3bdf17ca" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX90 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX90 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX90 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out specs. The image below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-3 and FX90.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus SH-3 to provide more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger SH-3 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aa62/3aa62a0c89cfd4d309a7700c5a4587c482493712" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX90 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX90 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53a90/53a90a661cd3bf720a8a306aea45fa302af72aec" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FX90 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2016-02-08 | 2011-08-26 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.5-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 5.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) | 149 grams (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 102 x 56 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | 200 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $579 | $227 |