Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZS5: The Ultimate Small Sensor Superzoom Showdown

When it comes to small sensor superzoom cameras, the Olympus Stylus SH-3 (hereafter “SH-3”) and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 (“ZS5”) are often brought up as flexible options for enthusiasts seeking portability with a powerful zoom lens. Having spent countless hours testing compact cameras for everything from travel to wildlife photography, I knew this pairing warranted careful comparison. They occupy similar niches but hail from different generations and design philosophies. Which one truly deserves your attention in 2024? Let’s dive in.

Size, Ergonomics, and Handling: Compact but With Different Philosophies

First impressions matter, and here the two exhibit distinct design approaches. The Olympus SH-3 is noticeably chunkier and heavier, coming in at 271 grams and measuring 109 x 63 x 42 mm. The Panasonic ZS5 is sleeker - 214 grams and 103 x 60 x 32 mm - clearly aiming for even more pocket-friendly portability.

The SH-3’s more substantial build lends itself to a better grip, and I appreciate the tactile feedback of its button layout during hands-on use. The ZS5’s slimmer profile is more discreet, perfect for street photographers or anyone prioritizing minimal footprint. Its smaller screen and lower-resolution display (2.7" at 230k pixels versus Olympus’ 3" at 460k pixels) can feel limiting, especially outdoors.

Ergonomically, the SH-3’s interface benefits from touchscreen controls, making navigation smoother, whereas the ZS5 relies on physical dials and buttons - less intuitive to modern users but with the charm of classic control. Both lack electronic viewfinders, relying solely on the rear LCD for composing shots, though the SH-3’s higher-res display is easier on the eyes.

If you prize sheer portability and stealth, Panasonic’s ZS5 edges ahead. For comfort and modern control finesse, Olympus is the better bet.

Top Layout and Controls: Simplicity Versus Subtle Complexity

Taking a closer look at the camera tops, the SH-3 offers a more recent design language.

You’ll notice the Olympus features a more compact cluster of buttons with a dedicated video record button and a mode dial that includes manual exposure options readily accessible.

The ZS5, designed years earlier, adopts a somewhat sparse approach with fewer dedicated controls. It does include aperture and shutter priority modes, a feature I rarely expect in point-and-shoots, which makes it a versatile tool if you like some manual override.

Neither camera boasts illuminated buttons - something I sorely missed during twilight shoots. Both feature built-in flashes with similar range, though Olympus’s slightly longer effective range is a subtle plus.

Ultimately, Olympus’s control setup feels a bit more polished and ergonomic for quick adjustments, while Panasonic gives you the essentials in a compact form.

Sensor and Image Quality: Leveraging Technology for Detail and Dynamic Range

Both cameras deploy 1/2.3" sensors, a common small sensor size in superzooms, but with very different sensor technologies and resolutions.

The SH-3’s 16MP BSI-CMOS sensor benefits from backside illumination, improving sensitivity and noise performance compared to the ZS5’s 12MP CCD sensor of an older generation. In practical terms, this means the SH-3 usually produces images with finer detail and cleaner shadows in low light.

While neither sensor can compete with APS-C or full-frame rivals, the SH-3 is the clear winner if your priority is maximum resolution and high ISO usability. Olympus also supports raw capture - a plus for enthusiasts wanting maximum post-processing flexibility - while Panasonic lacks raw support, relegating you to JPEGs.

I tested both cameras shooting identical scenes under controlled lighting. The SH-3 delivered more pleasing colors and noticeably less noise beyond ISO 800. The ZS5 images, while adequate in good light, struggled with grain and color shifts in dimmer conditions.

Bottom line: Olympus delivers superior image quality on account of its advanced sensor, making it more capable in diverse lighting.

Autofocus and Speed: Tracking Moving Subjects and Burst Shooting

The autofocus systems on both cameras are contrast-detection only, typical for their class, but Olympus adds a few modern refinements such as touch focus and face detection.

The SH-3 offers continuous autofocus and boasts an 11.5 frames-per-second burst mode - a whopping speed for a compact superzoom. It handles autofocus tracking well enough for casual wildlife or sports shots, but you’ll want to temper expectations against dedicated DSLRs or mirrorless models.

By contrast, the ZS5 caps out at 2 fps burst and does have face detection but lacks touch autofocus entirely. Tracking fast subjects proved challenging on the Panasonic during my tests, and I often encountered focus hunting in tricky light.

For shooting active scenes - kids playing, wildlife in motion - the Olympus SH-3 impresses with snappy response and faster frame rates, making it the preferred choice for dynamic photography within a compact form factor.

Lens and Zoom Reach: The Battle of Magnification Versus Speed

Both cameras come with a versatile built-in zoom lens, but their characteristics differ sharply.

Olympus’s lens covers a 24x zoom range from 25 to 600mm equivalent focal length, a true superzoom powerhouse. This wide reach enables capturing distant wildlife or detailed sports action without swapping lenses - key for travelers and outdoor photographers.

Panasonic’s lens is more restrained with a 12x zoom range (25 to 300mm equivalent), but benefits from a brighter maximum aperture (f/3.3–4.9 compared to f/3.0–6.9 on Olympus). The wider aperture on the Panasonic allows better low-light shooting and shallower depth of field at shorter telephoto lengths.

The tradeoff is obvious: Olympus favors reach over aperture speed, while Panasonic offers slightly better light-gathering at the expense of zoom length.

For macro enthusiasts, both focus down to 3 cm, adequate for casual close-ups but not true macro scale. The Olympus’s sensor-shift image stabilization also helps hand-held macro shots stay sharp.

Screen and Interface: Navigating Menus and Reviewing Shots

Image review and menu navigation can make or break daily use enjoyment.

Olympus’s 3-inch touchscreen with 460k dots is vibrant and responsive. Navigating settings and pinch-zooming images feels fluid, reminiscent of smartphone operation. That touchscreen autofocus is a handy bonus for quick focus shifts.

The Panasonic’s 2.7-inch, 230k-dot screen lacks touch but remains decently bright. However, the smaller size and lower resolution make image evaluation less comfortable, especially when critically judging sharpness or ISO noise.

If reviewing your shots on the go matters, the SH-3’s screen gives a noticeable advantage, boosting workflow speed and confidence.

Real-World Imaging: Sample Shots Under Varied Conditions

Seeing is believing, so I shot a series of test images under landscape, portrait, and wildlife conditions.

Olympus SH 3 front Olympus SH 3 screen back Panasonic ZS5 front Panasonic ZS5 screen back

Zooming into skin tones in portrait mode, Olympus delivers smoother, more natural representing tones, preserving highlights accurately and controlling noise better. The Panasonic’s portraits are softer and less detailed, with minor color shifts evident.

Landscape shots reveal Olympus’s higher resolution sensor preserves intricate textures in foliage and rock faces with commendable dynamic range. Panasonic’s images appear flatter with less detail retention in shadows and highlights.

Wildlife testing favored Olympus for reach and autofocus speed - critical for capturing birds at a distance sharply. The Panasonic did well only in bright daylight and at shorter zoom ranges.

In sum, Olympus outperforms in real-world imaging versatility and quality.

Performance Scores and Value: How Do They Rank?

Let’s summarize with overall ratings based on key performance metrics and value for money.

Olympus SH-3 scores higher thanks to:

• Superior sensor and image quality
• Faster burst shooting and improved autofocus
• Longer zoom range and better stabilization
• Enhanced interface with touchscreen and higher-res LCD

Panasonic ZS5 scores respectably for:

• Compactness and lightweight design
• Brighter lens aperture at shorter focal lengths
• Exposure flexibility including aperture and shutter priority modes
• Lower price point making it accessible to casual buyers

Considering price - Olympus at around $580 and Panasonic near $300 - the SH-3 offers a strong value proposition if you prioritize imaging quality.

Specialized Photography Use Cases: Matching Gear to Genre

Finally, let's evaluate suitability for specific photography genres:

• Portraits: Olympus wins due to higher resolution and better color rendition; Panasonic better for casual snapshots.
• Landscapes: Olympus’s dynamic range and resolution offer sharper, richer images.
• Wildlife: Olympus’s longer zoom and faster burst mode are decisive.
• Sports: Burst speed and autofocus favor Olympus; Panasonic less suited.
• Street: ZS5’s discreet size and quieter operation give it an edge.
• Macro: Both similar; Olympus’s stabilization might help slightly.
• Night/Astro: Olympus’s BSI sensor handles ISO better; Panasonic limited.
• Video: Olympus shoots up to 4K (albeit at 15 fps), while Panasonic maxes at HD 720p; Olympus wins for video.
• Travel: Both portable; Panasonic’s smaller size favored, but Olympus’s versatility and battery life (380 shots vs unknown) are reassuring.
• Professional Use: Olympus supports raw format, critical for workflow; Panasonic lacks raw and robust connectivity.

Build Quality and Connectivity: What You’re Handling

Neither camera features weather sealing or ruggedized construction, so outdoor users must exercise caution. Olympus’s sensor-shift image stabilization edge gives confidence in handheld shooting, especially at long zooms.

Connectivity-wise, Olympus includes built-in Wi-Fi to transfer images, a feature missing on Panasonic. Neither support Bluetooth, NFC, or USB 3.0 - a little disappointing but common for compact models of their respective eras.

Battery life is better documented on Olympus with 380 shots per charge using its LI-92B battery. Panasonic’s specs don’t specify exact capacity, but lighter weight likely trades off endurance. Both cameras use single SD card slots with support for SDHC and SDXC cards.

Video Features: Beyond Still Photography

Video shooters will find Olympus more capable here. The SH-3 supports 4K UHD video at 15 fps (slow for smooth motion) and Full HD 1080p at 60 and 30 fps. Its H.264 codec is standard, though audio options are basic - no mic or headphone jacks.

The Panasonic ZS5 maxes out at 720p at 30 fps, with Motion JPEG encoding. The lower-resolution video and dated codec mean less versatility and post-production potential.

Neither camera offers advanced video stabilization beyond optical/sensor-shift in still mode, limiting their attractiveness to videographers.

Pricing and Value: Making the Purchase Decision

Currently, the SH-3 benchmarks at about $580 new, reflecting its newer technology and broader features. The Panasonic ZS5 sits near $300, making it a budget-friendly option for casual shooters wanting optical zoom versatility without breaking the bank.

If your budget is tight or portability and simplicity reign, the ZS5 is a viable choice. But the Olympus SH-3’s superior specs, image quality, and modern conveniences justify the price premium - especially if you’re demanding better performance.

Final Thoughts: Which Should You Choose?

In wrapping up this detailed comparison, I’ll share my candid recommendation based on hands-on testing and practical experience.

If you prioritize image quality, zoom reach, manual control, and video capabilities, the Olympus SH-3 is the clear winner - its more advanced sensor, faster shooting speeds, 4K video, and touchscreen give it a competitive edge.

However, if you value lightweight size, decent zoom, and affordability, along with decent manual modes, Panasonic ZS5 remains a standout compact from its era, suitable for street photography, casual travel, or beginners entering the superzoom realm.

Both cameras remind us of the compromises inherent in small sensor superzooms, but the SH-3’s enhancements make it a more future-proof option. As always, consider your shooting style, priorities, and budget carefully.

Enjoy your photographic adventures - whether you pick Olympus’s power or Panasonic’s portability!

Summary Table

I hope this thorough comparative analysis helps you narrow down your choices! For more detailed tests and sample galleries, check out my full hands-on reviews linked throughout. Happy shooting!

YourNextCamera #SuperzoomShowdown #OlympusVS Panasonic