Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL5

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Samsung CL5 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
14
Overall
24

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Old Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Samsung CL5
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
  • 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Additionally referred to as PL10
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL5 Overview

Following is a extended analysis of the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung CL5, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the CL5 (9MP) is relatively close but the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and CL5 (1/2.5") come with totally different sensor measurements.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The GR Digital IV was brought out 2 years after the CL5 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the GR Digital IV grades vs the CL5 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung CL5

 GR Digital IV CL5 
ReleasedSeptember 2011February 2009More modern by 32 months
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1230k230kCrisper screen (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 CL5 GR Digital IV 

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung CL5

 GR Digital IV CL5 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital IV enjoys outside measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung CL5 has proportions of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Samsung CL5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the GR Digital IV vs the CL5.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL5 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and CL5 is 92 and 95 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL5 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by looking through specifications. The pic underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital IV and CL5.

Plainly, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Ricoh GR Digital IV will render greater detail having its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher GR Digital IV will have an edge in sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL5 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography info
Samsung CL5 Portrait photography info
41
has manual focus
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
24
includes face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
low MP (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Street photography with Samsung CL5
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
47
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Sports photography with Samsung CL5
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good battery (390 shots)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect autofocus
16
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography info
Samsung CL5 Travel photography info
67
good battery (390 shots)
built-in flash
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
51
has built in flash
no Timelapse mode
low MP (9 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (38mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography information
Samsung CL5 Landscape photography information
53
has manual focus
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
good battery (390 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
22
lack of manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (38mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW support
no Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Vlogging camera
Samsung CL5 as a Vlogging camera
29
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone port
25
includes face detect focusing
wide angle not good (38mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung CL5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung CL5
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSamsung CL5
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR Digital IV Samsung CL5
Also called as - PL10
Type Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Revealed 2011-09-15 2009-02-23
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 38-114mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/1.9 f/3.5-4.5
Macro focus range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 4.8 6.3
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 1,230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1 secs 16 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 4.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 190 grams (0.42 lbs) 141 grams (0.31 lbs)
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 390 shots -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model DB65 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots One One
Launch price $599 $391