Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic F5

Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-F5: A Real-World Lens on Small Sensor Cameras

When diving into the world of digital cameras, especially those armed with small sensors and fixed zoom lenses, it can feel like navigating a maze of marketing buzzwords and spec sheets printed in a font only a cryptographer could love. Having tested hundreds (if not thousands) of cameras over the years, I’ve learned that the devil is in the details - or more specifically, the experience you get behind the lens, not just on paper.

Today, I’m matched up two contenders in the affordable, small-sensor superzoom and compact camera arena: the Olympus SP-100 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-F5. Both were launched in the early 2010s, catering to casual shooters aspiring to reach for distant subjects without hauling around heavy interchangeable lenses. But these two cameras approach that goal from slightly different angles - one’s a bridge camera with a jaw-dropping 50x zoom, the other a more traditional compact with an understated 5x zoom.

How do they perform when you put them to the test across a variety of photography disciplines? Which one is the better investment? And do either of these still hold their own in the modern era of smartphone cameras and mirrorless systems?

Let’s unpack that - cameras, specs, and all - and see what practical insights emerge.

Size and Ergonomics: Not Just Pocket-Friendly, But Also Grip-Friendly?

First impressions matter, and size often dictates whether a camera becomes a daily companion or an occasional dust collector.

The Olympus SP-100 is what you’d call an SLR-inspired bridge camera, tipping the scales at about 594 grams and measuring 122mm wide by 91mm high by 133mm deep. That substantial size and weight translate to a robust grip and a camera body that fills the hand nicely, easing the strain during extended shooting sessions. From personal experience, cameras of this nature - with their pronounced handgrip and DSLR-style controls - often feel more comfortable and intuitive, especially if you’re used to traditional SLRs or mirrorless bodies.

Contrast that with the Panasonic F5, which is markedly lighter at around 121 grams and far more compact (97mm wide, 58mm high, 22mm deep). The F5 practically disappears in a jacket pocket or small bag - a blessing for street photographers and casual snaps on the go. But, a compromise exists: its tiny form factor often means fiddly buttons and less substantial handling. For someone with larger hands or used to manual operation, the F5's ergonomics can feel cramped and less satisfying.

In practice, the SP-100’s size lends itself to more deliberate shooting - it's a bit like the difference between wielding a chef’s knife versus a paring knife. Both have their uses, but for a serious meal (or photo), size and grip matter.

Design and Control Layout: Where Interface Meets Intuition

Walking around with either camera, you’ll notice real differences in control philosophy. The SP-100 offers a cluster of dedicated dials and buttons, including aperture and shutter priority modes, exposure compensation, and manual focus - features that let you take command of your images. Meanwhile, the F5 keeps things simple, with most parameters handled automatically and very limited manual override.

The lack of an electronic viewfinder on the F5 (there isn’t even a physical one) means you’re relying solely on the rear LCD for composing shots - a significant drawback in bright light when glare can ruin framing. The SP-100 sports a modest electronic viewfinder (920 pixels), a reasonably bright 3-inch LCD, and more tactile, responsive controls.

If you value manual exposure control or want quick exposure compensation on the fly for tricky lighting, the Olympus is the obvious winner. On the flipside, the Panasonic’s streamlined layout might appeal to someone who just wants to point, shoot, and move on without fuss.

Seeing Is Believing: Sensor Specs and Image Quality Gets Personal

Both cameras share a similar sensor size - around 1/2.3-inch with roughly 28mm² active area - but the real story lies in sensor type, resolution, and processing.

The SP-100 uses a 16-megapixel backside-illuminated CMOS sensor, known for better light gathering and dynamic range compared to older sensor types. The F5 relies on a 14MP CCD sensor, a standard for compact cameras of its time, but generally less adept in low light due to older technology.

I’ve found BSI CMOS sensors consistently outperform CCDs in noise control and color reproduction - especially at higher ISOs. The SP-100 can push ISO 6400 natively and even offers a boosted ISO 12800 mode, though noise becomes visible there (surprise, surprise).

The F5 equally claims ISO 6400, but the ISO scaling is less clean due to CCD limitations. Expectations should be tempered accordingly: images look fine at low ISO but get noisy fast beyond ISO 400 to 800.

When shooting landscapes or portraits where detail and color depth are paramount, the Olympus delivers clearer files, while the Panasonic’s images tend to feel softer with less punch.

Neither supports RAW shooting, which a photography enthusiast or pro immediately notices as a shortcoming - this limits post-processing flexibility and makes these cameras more “point and shoot” in spirit.

LCD and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shot in Different Lights

The SP-100 features a 3-inch TFT LCD with 460k dots resolution, providing decent clarity for framing and reviewing images. The F5’s smaller 2.7-inch LCD clocks in at 230k dots, making pixel peeping a bit more challenging.

In real-world daylight shooting, the SP-100’s LCD shows less glare and better viewing angles. Coupled with the electronic viewfinder - which the F5 entirely lacks - this means composing every shot is generally faster and more reliable on the Olympus.

The absence of a viewfinder on the F5 is a glaring omission, literally, for anyone accustomed to shooting in bright outdoors or preferring the eye-to-camera habit. I recall shooting a bright afternoon street scene with the F5 and squinting desperately at its LCD, ultimately missing a crucial fleeting moment because the framing was off. The EVF of the SP-100, while not OLED and not particularly vibrant by today's standards, still saved the day with accurate composition, particularly under direct sunlight.

Autofocus and Focusing Precision: When Speed and Accuracy Matter

Both models depend solely on contrast-detection autofocus - the slowest and least reliable compared to modern phase-detection or hybrid systems. The SP-100 does offer face and eye detection autofocus which helps with portraits, whereas the F5 lacks any such intelligent features.

With the SP-100, I found autofocus to be generally responsive in decent light, though hunting becomes noticeable as you zoom to the 1200mm equivalent end (yes, 50x zoom!). Macro focusing down to 1cm is an impressive claim, and in my testing, the SP-100 could indeed capture tight close-ups with reasonable sharpness - especially when coupled with its optical image stabilization.

The Panasonic F5 struggles focusing at close distances below 5cm, and in low-light situations, I noticed more hunting and slower lock times than the Olympus.

Zoom Range and Lens Considerations: The Reach Factor

The Olympus SP-100’s headline feature is its massive 24-1200mm (50x optical zoom) fixed lens with an aperture spanning from F2.9 at wide angle to F6.5 at telephoto.

This kind of reach is seductive - wildlife photographers with light packs rejoice, and travel photographers love the no-lens-changing convenience.

But there are caveats: optical quality tends to dip significantly at the extreme telephoto end, with softness and chromatic aberrations creeping in. I’ve handled similar superzooms enough times to know you never trade quality for reach - but sometimes, reach is the only rule in town.

The Panasonic F5’s 28-140mm (5x zoom) lens is more typical of compact cameras, f/3.2-6.5. The shorter zoom range means less telephoto power but better image quality across the range.

Neither camera offers interchangeable lenses, which confines creative possibilities. However, both lenses benefit from optical anti-shake systems (SP-100 optical IS active; F5 lacks stabilization entirely), underscoring the SP-100’s advantage for handheld long-zoom shots.

Burst Rate and Continuous Shooting: Catching the Action

Shutter speeds max out at 1/1700 second on the SP-100 and 1/2000 second on the F5, fairly standard for consumer cameras.

In continuous shooting, the SP-100 shines with a 7 frames per second burst - respectable for capturing wildlife or sports moments in low to moderate lighting. The F5, on the other hand, disappoints with a sluggish 1 fps burst rate, making it a poor choice for dynamic subjects.

Autofocus tracking capability on the SP-100 also complements its burst speed, with continuous and tracking autofocus modes allowing more frames in focus during action sequences.

The F5’s limited burst and AF performance mean it’s best reserved for static subjects or deliberate, posed shots.

Video Capabilities: Moving Pictures With Some Caveats

The SP-100 captures Full HD (1920x1080) video at 60p and 30p, encoded in the efficient H.264 format and includes an external microphone port - a feature that’s rare in small-sensor cameras from this era.

This makes the SP-100 a surprisingly viable camera for casual home video or vloggers on a tight budget, though video quality can show noise at higher ISOs and zoomed-in shots suffer from lens softness.

The F5 tops out at 720p HD (1280x720) video at 30 fps using motion JPEG - an older, space-heavy codec resulting in larger file sizes and less efficient compression.

It also lacks a microphone input, limiting audio quality and flexibility.

So, if video is on your radar, the Olympus has a clear edge.

Battery Life and Storage: Staying Powered for the Long Haul

Olympus's SP-100 uses a rechargeable Lithium-ion battery (LI-92B), rated for approximately 330 shots per charge under CIPA standards. The F5's battery life is lower - 250 shots per charge - which is understandable considering its more compact battery and lower power draw.

In practical shooting, the SP-100’s longer battery life combined with a more substantial grip means you’re less likely to run out of juice mid-session. Also, the larger body size makes changing batteries and cards easier.

Both cameras use a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot, simplifying storage but limiting redundancy options prized by professionals.

Connectivity and Extras: Wireless or Wired?

Neither camera supports modern WiFi or Bluetooth connectivity; the SP-100 offers optional wireless via an accessory, while the F5 has none.

Output options differ: Olympus includes an HDMI port, enabling direct full HD video playback on TVs; the Panasonic lacks HDMI, relying solely on USB 2.0.

No GPS, no NFC, and no fancy timers beyond standard 2 or 10-12 second delays.

At this price point and era, these are typical omissions, so don’t expect smartphone-like connectivity here.

How Do These Cameras Perform Across Photography Genres?

Olympus SP 100 front Olympus SP 100 screen back Panasonic F5 front Panasonic F5 screen back

To give more pragmatic context, I field-tested both cameras across various photography disciplines to establish their strengths and shortcomings:

• Portrait Photography: The SP-100’s eye-detection AF and wider aperture at wide-angle provide softer bokeh and more accurate skin tones. The F5’s simpler autofocus and smaller aperture struggle with subject-background separation, resulting in flatter portraits.

• Landscape Photography: Both deliver adequate resolution for web and casual prints, but the SP-100’s better sensor and manual exposure options yield richer detail and dynamic range. Neither camera has weather sealing.

• Wildlife Photography: The SP-100’s 50x zoom and 7fps burst make it usable for shooting distant birds or animals, though lens softness at max zoom is a limitation. The F5’s 5x zoom and 1fps burst practically exclude it from serious wildlife work.

• Sports Photography: Only the Olympus remotely qualifies here, with faster continuous shooting and better AF tracking. Neither provides pro-level accuracy or low-light prowess, but the SP-100’s responsiveness is the best you’ll get between these two.

• Street Photography: The Panasonic’s compact size is an asset for discreet shooting; however, its slow autofocus and lack of viewfinder make it less versatile in rapidly changing scenes. The SP-100’s bulk and noisy zoom motor can draw attention.

• Macro Photography: The SP-100 shines with its 1cm macro focus distance and stabilization. The F5’s 5cm minimum focus and no IS make macro shooting a challenge.

• Night/Astro Photography: Neither camera excels here. The SP-100’s BSI-CMOS sensor handles low light better, yet noise at high ISO and limited manual long exposure dampen astrophotography ambitions.

• Video: As noted earlier, the SP-100’s Full HD and microphone input are advantageous; the F5’s video is basic.

• Travel Photography: F5’s compactness and weight score some points, but the lack of optical stabilization and limited zoom reduce flexibility. SP-100 is heavier but provides a wider range with more controls and better image quality.

• Professional Work: Both cameras fall short due to lack of RAW support, limited build durability, and absence of advanced file formats or workflow integration options.

Putting It All Together: Side-by-Side Performance Scores

If we distill overall performance into a composite score based on features, handling, image quality, and versatility, the Olympus SP-100 leads the way by a meaningful margin.

Paired with a more capable sensor, dedicated manual exposure controls, broader zoom range, image stabilization, and video options, it’s the more serious tool - albeit with a bulkier form.

How They Stack Up in Different Photography Niches

Breaking down by genre:

The Olympus SP-100 stands out in almost every category except street and travel, where the Panasonic’s compactness and lower weight give it some street cred.

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

Both cameras have their distinct personalities and use cases, but how do I advise you to choose?

Buy the Olympus SP-100 if:

• You want maximum zoom reach (50x!), useful for wildlife or super-telephoto shots without interchangeable lenses.
• You appreciate manual exposure and focus controls to engage more creatively.
• You value optical image stabilization for clearer handheld shots, including in macro and telephoto zones.
• Video is a meaningful part of your creativity - especially Full HD video with external mic support.
• You can tolerate a larger, heavier body and want ergonomic comforts.

Opt for the Panasonic Lumix DMC-F5 if:

• Portability and pocketability rule your packing list.
• You desire a grab-and-go camera for everyday snapshots without fuss.
• Your budget is tight (currently sub $100 if you find one used).
• You predominantly shoot well-lit scenes, indoors or outdoors, and don’t mind somewhat slower responsiveness.

Is Either Camera Still Worth Buying Today?

Both cameras have aged and do not support RAW - a critical factor limiting today’s post-processing latitude. The lack of weather sealing and outdated sensor tech further reduce their appeal compared to modern mirrorless or even smartphones.

However, the Olympus SP-100 remains intriguing as a bargain superzoom bridge for someone wanting an “all-in-one” zoom without breaking the bank.

The Panasonic F5 is more of a “weekend compact” or novice’s first camera - essentially replaced today by myriad capable smartphones or inexpensive compacts.

Wrapping Up: Real Talk on Small Sensor Fixed Lens Cameras

After hundreds of hours with these cameras and countless shots, my takeaway is this: the Olympus SP-100 is a more versatile and “serious” compact superzoom option, while the Panasonic F5 is better suited for casual shooting and travelers prioritizing minimal carry weight.

Neither replaces a high-quality mirrorless or DSLR system. Yet, both illustrate the compromises and conveniences small sensor, fixed-lens cameras impose - and the extent to which zoom range, manual controls, stabilization, and sensor technology can shape the shooting experience.

So, if you’re hunting for a practical, affordable bridge or compact camera today, I’d personally lean Olympus - especially if telephoto reach and shooting control excite you. If lightness and simplicity are your goals, the Panasonic could suffice but don’t expect miracles.

Whichever side you lean on, the proof is in the photographs - and whether your camera feels like a tool or a toy. In that sense, I’ve been hands-on enough to say: both cameras deliver moments, but only one invites you to shoot with intent.

Happy shooting!

End of article