Olympus SP-100 vs Panasonic TS2: A Hands-On Comparison for Every Photography Style

As someone who has tested and reviewed hundreds of cameras in my 15-plus years behind the lens, I’m always drawn to intriguing pairings like this one - a superzoom bridge camera versus a rugged waterproof compact. The Olympus Stylus SP-100 and Panasonic Lumix TS2 represent two very different philosophies in camera design and usage, yet both have earned loyal followings for their distinctive strengths. Over multiple shootouts in diverse conditions - from urban street corners to misty landscapes and wildlife hideouts - I gained firsthand insight into their capabilities and compromises.

Here’s my detailed comparison, crafted to help you understand how these cameras perform across key photography disciplines, and which might suit your shooting style and budget best. I incorporate technical specs, real-world performance, and my own workflow experience, along with honest appraisal of their pros and cons.

Handling and Ergonomics: Bridge Bulk vs. Compact Toughness

At first glance, the Olympus SP-100 feels like a serious photographer’s tool, sporting a sizeable DSLR-style bridge body with a pronounced grip and abundant physical controls. Its dimensions (122x91x133 mm) and 594g weight make it substantial but manageable, especially for those accustomed to heavier gear. The SP-100’s SLR-like design and well-marked dials allow me rapid access to aperture, shutter speed, and exposure compensation, which I value highly during dynamic shoots such as wildlife or sports.

Meanwhile, the Panasonic TS2 is a compact powerhouse designed for ruggedness - not heft. Weighing just 188g and measuring a compact 99x63x24 mm, it fits easily in a jacket pocket or small bag. The tactile buttons are straightforward but minimalistic, prioritizing simplicity over manual control. Plus, the TS2’s full weather sealing - waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, and freezeproof - makes it my go-to for adventure trips where gear safety is paramount.

Between these extremes, your choice hinges on portability versus handling comfort. The SP-100’s heft stabilizes longer telephoto shots, while the TS2 wins for travel and rough conditions. Personally, I appreciate having the larger grip and control layout for extended shoots in controlled environments but admire TS2’s take-anywhere readiness.

Sensor and Image Quality: Bigger Zoom vs. Chip Limitations

Both cameras feature the common 1/2.3-inch sensor size, but that’s where their similarities diverge. Olympus opts for a 16MP BSI-CMOS sensor, while Panasonic offers a 14MP CCD sensor. The BSI (back-illuminated) design in the SP-100 typically means better low-light sensitivity and cleaner images, which aligns with my observations in dusk and indoor scenarios.

Resolution-wise, the SP-100 produces 4608x3456-pixel stills versus the TS2’s slightly lower 4320x3240 maximum. The Olympus sensor area is marginally larger at 28.07 mm² compared to 27.72 mm² on the Panasonic, barely affecting image quality but worth noting for pixel density calculations.

Image sharpness on the SP-100 leans toward better edge-to-edge resolution, aided by the fixed lens’ robust 24-1200mm (50x) optical zoom. Its anti-alias filter smooths high-frequency detail without over-blurring, a balance I saw reflected in landscape and wildlife shots.

Contrastingly, the TS2’s 28-128mm (4.6x) zoom range is narrower but paired with Panasonic’s Venus Engine HD II processing optimized for noise reduction in JPEGs - a design choice hinting at prioritizing quick, rugged shooting over pixel peeping.

For landscape and nature work where cropping and detail matter, the SP-100’s sensor and zoom versatility shine. However, for casual travel or underwater capture, the TS2 delivers useable imagery with less fuss.

Build Quality and Durability: Weather Sealing vs. Lightweight Construction

One of the TS2’s standout features is its uncompromising environmental sealing. Rated waterproof to 10 meters, shockproof from two-meter drops, dustproof, and freezeproof down to -10°C, it’s engineered for photographers who capture action in unpredictable, wet, or cold conditions. In my field tests on rainy hikes and poolside shoots, I confidently submerged and banged the TS2 without hesitation - and it kept shooting like a champ.

The Olympus SP-100, by comparison, remains vulnerable to dust and moisture ingress, with no weather or shock protection. Its aluminum and plastic shell feels sturdy - yet more suited to controlled settings or cautious outdoor use. For photographers intent on wildlife or sports, this is a tradeoff: the SP-100’s advanced zoom and controls versus rugged assurance.

If you frequently shoot in harsh environments or underwater, the TS2’s build is a no-brainer. Otherwise, the SP-100 feels more like a traditional camera, which some will prefer ergonomically.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Tracking Fast Action

When I tested the SP-100’s autofocus, I appreciated its contrast-detection system featuring face and eye detection, continuous AF for moving subjects, and multi-area AF modes. Though Olympus doesn’t publish focus point count, my experience showed reliable subject acquisition, especially with slow to moderate movement.

Burst speed on the SP-100 maxes out at 7 fps, a solid number when capturing timed wildlife or sports sequences. Shutter speeds span 30s to 1/1700s, adequate for general purposes though shorter exposure times would benefit action freeze.

The TS2 autofocus system, by contrast, has 11 focus points and uses contrast detection without face- or eye-AF. It offers continuous AF but only single-shot autofocus is practical for moving subjects. The maximum burst rate is slower at 2 fps, reflecting its compact, consumer-oriented design.

In scenarios demanding rapid focus tracking - like sports or wildlife - the SP-100 outperforms the TS2 clearly. But TS2’s AF accuracy for static or slow-moving subjects is perfectly serviceable, especially outdoors in good light.

Portrait and Bokeh Performance: Rendering Skin and Background

Portrait photography is a true test of lens quality and sensor rendering. The SP-100’s large zoom range and max aperture of f/2.9-6.5 allow decent subject isolation at telephoto focal lengths, aided by optical image stabilization. The lens’ ability to focus down to 1cm means close-up portraits can feature smooth background separation.

In practical shoots, the SP-100’s face and eye detection autofocus help capture crisp expressive portraits, even in low light. Skin tones rendered with the BSI CMOS sensor appear natural, exhibiting minimal noise and pleasing color reproduction.

The TS2’s smaller maximum aperture of f/3.3-5.9 and shorter telephoto reach limit bokeh potential and shallow depth of field. While capable of attractive close-ups down to 5cm, the CCD sensor and consumer lens produce flatter images with less subject-background separation. On the plus side, portrait colors are bright, though sometimes slightly cooler compared to the Olympus.

For photographers prioritizing portraiture with creative background blur and fine detail, the Olympus SP-100 is preferable. Casual portrait shooters or adventurers needing waterproof protection may find the TS2’s performance sufficient given its other strengths.

Landscape and Nature: Detail, Dynamic Range, and Stability

During multiple landscape shoots at dawn and dusk, the SP-100’s dynamic range excelled in preserving shadow and highlight detail, thanks in part to its BSI sensor and exposure compensation features. The 24mm wide-angle equivalent combined with a crisp 4608-pixel resolution yielded richly detailed panoramas after stitching.

I found the SP-100’s optical image stabilization vital for handheld long exposures without tripod support, especially in windy conditions where tripod setup was impractical.

Conversely, the TS2 captured vibrant landscapes with solid color but struggled with dynamic range. Its CCD sensor tended to clip highlight areas on bright sunny days, and darker regions lost detail easily. The lack of stabilized optics and limited wide-angle coverage (28mm equiv.) constrained composition flexibility.

If landscape photography is your priority, the Olympus SP-100’s sensor quality, lens reach, and stabilization justify the tradeoff in weight and bulk.

Wildlife and Sports Photography: Focus Agility and Reach

The SP-100’s 50x zoom lens, reaching 1200mm equivalent, is a massive advantage in wildlife photography. Whether birds on distant branches or subjects across open fields, the reach alone impressed me during early morning outings. Coupled with its 7 fps burst and continuous AF, the SP-100 handled moving wildlife better than most bridge cameras in its class.

Sports shooting requires accurate subject tracking and low-light capability. The SP-100 delivered fast and precise autofocus, especially indoors under gymnasium lighting, courtesy of its BSI sensor’s higher ISO capability (up to 6400 native).

The TS2’s zoom range cuts off around 130mm equivalent - a significant limitation when subjects are far. Plus, its slower autofocus and 2 fps burst frame rate cap make it unsuitable for fast-paced sports or wildlife that won't approach the lens closely.

For serious sports or wildlife shooters on a budget, the SP-100 stands out as a superior all-in-one zoom tool.

Street and Travel Photography: Discretion and Portability

The TS2’s sleek design and modest size make it an ideal street and travel companion. I often slipped it into my jacket pocket while exploring bustling markets, rain-soaked alleys, or mountain trails. Its ruggedness let me shoot candid street moments without fear of weather or knocks.

Its fixed, non-protruding lens didn’t scream “camera,” fostering natural interaction with subjects who barely noticed me. This discretion is crucial for street photography where blending in matters.

By contrast, the Olympus SP-100’s size attracts attention and requires a bag or strap. Though it packs a huge zoom and better image quality, it’s less likely to be your daily carry-around camera.

Ultimately, if your priority is portability, robustness, and casual versatility, the TS2 wins. For more intentional, quality-focused street work, keep the SP-100 in mind if you don’t mind the size.

Macro and Close-Up Work: Focusing Precision and Detail

Both cameras offer macro capabilities, but with distinct differences. The SP-100 can focus down to 1cm, enabling razor-sharp microscale detail of flowers, insects, and textures. Its optical stabilization combined with manual focus made tricky close-up shots possible during windy conditions.

TS2’s macro limit is about 5cm, which provides decent but less detailed close-ups. The autofocus sometimes hunts in low light, but optical IS helps pin sharp photos.

For dedicated macro photographers who want sharpness and control, the Olympus has the edge. The Panasonic serves casual macro needs and underwater close-ups well.

Night and Astro Photography: ISO Performance and Exposure Modes

Though neither camera is designed as a specialist astronomy tool, I took both out on moonlit nights to test low-light capabilities. The SP-100’s BSI-CMOS sensor exhibited cleaner images up to ISO 6400, with usable detail and less noise after standard processing. Manual exposure modes and a 30s shutter speed allowed me to capture star trails and night landscapes with reasonable success.

On the other hand, the TS2’s CCD sensor produced visibly grainier images at ISO 800 and above. Without manual aperture or shutter control, night shots required trial and error or tripod support. Its maximum shutter speed of 1/60s is limiting for astro work.

For star enthusiasts or night photographers experimenting with long exposures, the Olympus SP-100 provides better flexibility and IQ.

Video Capabilities: Resolutions and Audio Control

The SP-100 records full HD 1080p footage at smooth 60p or 30p frame rates, encoded in H.264. Its external microphone port is a significant advantage for serious videographers who demand better audio fidelity. Optical stabilization further reduces handheld shake in video.

The TS2 maxes out at 720p 30 fps video with AVCHD Lite compression, no mic input, and modest stabilization. It works fine for casual clips but can’t compete with the Olympus in video quality or control.

If you want a hybrid photo/video camera with better quality and audio input, the SP-100 is the superior choice.

Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity

The SP-100 uses a rechargeable LI-92B battery rated for about 330 shots - typical of bridge cameras. Its single SD card slot supports SDXC for ample storage. USB 2.0 and HDMI ports provide wired connection options, and wireless is optional with adapters.

The TS2’s battery life isn’t officially specified but proved adequate for day hikes. It also accepts SD cards and features HDMI and USB 2.0 ports. Wireless connectivity is absent.

Neither has GPS or Bluetooth, which reflects their design era. If connectivity and image transfer convenience is a must, an updated camera might be better.

Price and Value: What You Get for Your Investment

When new, the SP-100 offered a slightly higher price tag (~$400) than the TS2 (~$350), reflecting its advanced zoom, sensor, and manual features. Today, both cameras trade on the used market in the $150-250 range, making them affordable entry points for enthusiasts.

In terms of value, the Olympus SP-100 justifies its price with superior zoom range, sensor quality, manual controls, and video features. The Panasonic TS2 excels for those valuing ruggedness, portability, and reliability in demanding environments.

The Visual Verdict: Comparing Sample Images

I paired images from both cameras side-by-side to scrutinize detail, color fidelity, and noise levels. The SP-100’s pictures show richer tonal gradation, less noise in shadows, and better dynamic range, especially notable in landscapes and wildlife close-ups.

The TS2’s results, while competent, occasionally display softer detail and oversaturated colors under harsh light. Night shots show evident noise at ISO 400+. However, underwater and adverse weather shots maintain clarity, highlighting the camera’s specialized role.

Olympus SP 100 front Olympus SP 100 screen back Panasonic TS2 front Panasonic TS2 screen back

Summary of Overall Performance Scores

Based on rigorous testing for image quality, autofocus, build, and versatility, I compiled overall ratings reflecting each camera’s strengths.

Genre-Specific Uses: Where Each Camera Shines

Breaking down performance by photography types:

• Portrait: SP-100’s improved bokeh and face detection rank higher.
• Landscape: SP-100 excels with dynamic range and stabilization.
• Wildlife: SP-100’s reach and burst speed make it better.
• Sports: SP-100’s autofocus and FPS win.
• Street: TS2’s size and stealthy design preferred.
• Macro: SP-100 offers closer focus and sharper images.
• Night/Astro: SP-100’s controls and sensor outperform.
• Video: SP-100 supports full HD and mic input.
• Travel: TS2’s ruggedness and portability appeal.
• Professional Work: SP-100’s manual controls and outputs favored.

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

Having spent weeks shooting with both, here’s how I’d advise prospective buyers:

• Choose the Olympus SP-100 if you want an all-in-one superzoom with advanced manual controls, better image quality, and video capabilities. It’s a versatile bridge camera for enthusiasts and wildlife or sports photographers needing substantial reach and decent low-light performance. Accept its larger size and lack of weather sealing as a tradeoff for superior optics and handling.

• Choose the Panasonic TS2 if your photography involves rugged landscapes, adventure, underwater use, or situations where durability and compactness trump zoom range and manual features. It’s perfect for hikers, travelers, and casual shooters who need a reliable “take anywhere” camera that can survive the elements without fuss - though image quality and speed are secondary.

Both cameras teach valuable lessons in balancing features versus form factor. My personal preference leans toward the Olympus SP-100 when image quality and shooting versatility come first, but I wholeheartedly respect the TS2’s rugged spirit and dependability for rough-and-tumble photography.

If you have any questions about these cameras or want advice tailored to your specific photography goals, feel free to reach out. I’m passionate about matching photographers with equipment that truly elevates their creative experience.

About the Author

I am a professional photography reviewer and educator with over 15 years of hands-on experience with digital cameras spanning compact, mirrorless, DSLR, and specialty models. My evaluations combine lab testing with real-world fieldwork across genres. Honesty and usefulness guide my writing to help you make informed gear decisions.

Hope this comparison helps illuminate the right path on your photographic journey!