Olympus SP-100 vs Sony H200: Which Bridge Superzoom Deserves Your Pocket Change?

As someone who’s spent well over 15 years testing cameras across every price range and photography style, I know how tricky choosing the right bridge superzoom camera can be. These SLR-esque hybrids tempt with massive zoom ranges and all-in-one convenience, often at wallet-friendly prices. But not all supersized zoom beasts are created equal. Today, we're diving deep into a side-by-side comparison between two budget-conscious superzooms from the mid-2010s: the Olympus Stylus SP-100 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200.

Both cameras are intended for enthusiasts and casual shooters who want an all-in-one travel companion, but their strengths and weaknesses manifest in subtle - and some not-so-subtle - ways. I’ve put these two through my typical hands-on testing routine covering sensor performance, autofocus, handling, and real-world shooting across various photography types. Along the way, I’ll share insights only a seasoned reviewer can offer, helping you make an informed choice that aligns with your style and needs.

Let’s start by putting their physical presence into perspective.

Size and Handling: Bulky Bridge Bodies That Aim to Impress

At first glance, both models mimic the SLR look, but their physical dimensions and weights differ enough to impact portability and ergonomics.

• Olympus SP-100: Measuring 122 x 91 x 133 mm and weighing 594 grams, the SP-100 feels solid and hefty in the hand. It’s built around a fixed 24–1200mm equivalent zoom lens, and Olympus leaned into robust handling, with well-defined grip contours that allow comfortable one-handed operation for extended periods.

• Sony H200: Slightly more compact at 123 x 83 x 87 mm and lighter at 530 grams, the H200 fits better into tight spaces and will be less intimidating for street photography or casual travel. That said, its thinner build and lighter weight translate to a less substantial grip, which some users might find compromises shooting stability, especially at long telephoto.

Between the two, I prefer the Olympus for comfort during long sessions, but the Sony’s lower profile might appeal to anyone prioritizing packability.

Design and Control Layout: Are There Clubs for Our Thumbs?

When shooting, control feel and layout make a surprising difference. Experienced shooters crave intuitive dials and quick access to key settings.

The Olympus SP-100 features a traditional control scheme with dedicated dials for aperture, shutter speed, and exposure compensation. You get decent customization, though no touchscreen or illuminated buttons, which isn’t surprising at this price point. The electronic viewfinder (EVF) is a nice plus, sporting a 920k-dot resolution for reasonably clear framing - quite a rarity in budget bridge cameras.

In contrast, the Sony H200 lacks an EVF entirely, relying solely on its rear 460k-dot ClearPhoto LCD. While the screen is ample for composing outside, the absence of a viewfinder can be frustrating under bright sunlight or when extending the zoom to full reach, where camera shake is most punishing.

Sony’s interface simplifies things, but it trades off manual control - there’s no shutter or aperture priority modes, nor can you dial in manual exposure, limiting creative control. Olympus gives those who want to learn and experiment more breathing room.

Sensor Specifications and Image Quality: Where Numbers Meet Reality

The heart of any camera is its sensor, and these two share a small but significant similarity: both use tiny 1/2.3-inch sensors measuring roughly 6.17 x 4.55 mm (about 28 mm² sensor area). But their approaches to sensor design differ.

• Olympus SP-100: Uses a 16MP backside-illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor. BSI sensors typically offer improved light gathering and better noise performance compared to older sensor tech. This helps slightly at higher ISOs, especially given the sensor size limitations.

• Sony H200: Equipped with a 20MP CCD sensor - a generation behind in sensor technology. CCDs generally exhibit more noise and lower dynamic range than modern CMOS sensors, which shows in low light and challenging contrast situations.

In my lab tests and shooting real-world scenes, the Olympus SP-100 delivered cleaner images at base and moderate ISO values up to 800, exhibiting better tonal gradation and slightly improved dynamic range. The Sony’s higher 20MP count looks good on paper but translates to more image noise and limited usable ISO range beyond 200–400.

Neither camera supports RAW capture, which constrains post-processing flexibility - a big consideration if you like maximum creative control.

LCD Screens and User Interface: Is Bigger Always Better?

For framing and menu navigation, the rear screen quality and feedback are crucial.

Both cameras feature fixed 3-inch LCDs with identical 460k-dot resolutions. The SP-100 uses a TFT LCD panel, while the H200 touts its “ClearPhoto” display for better readability under sunlight.

In practice, I found the Sony’s LCD a bit brighter and easier to see outdoors, though it lacks touch functionality. Olympus sacrifices some screen vivacity but compensates with its electronic viewfinder option, which aids in composing during bright outdoor shoots or when stability is paramount.

Menu systems on both feel dated and somewhat clunky, with the Olympus offering more photorealistic icons and slightly faster response times. Neither interface supports touchscreen input - a minor inconvenience for casual users accustomed to smartphone-style controls.

Zoom Range and Optical Performance: The Battle of Telephoto Titans

The main sales pitch of bridge cameras is their zoom range, smushing together wide-angle and super-telephoto power in one body.

• Olympus SP-100: Impressively offers a 24–1200mm (50x) equivalent zoom with a max aperture range of f/2.9 to f/6.5. This gives exceptional reach, letting you photograph distant wildlife or lunar landscapes without carrying extra lenses.

• Sony H200: Offers a still respectable but shorter 24–633mm (26.4x) zoom, with max apertures ranging from f/3.1 to f/5.9.

In practical use, Olympus’s super-long zoom has a tradeoff - the outer reaches suffer image softness and chromatic aberrations typical of extreme zoom lenses on small sensors. The Sony’s shorter zoom provides slightly sharper images across its range, albeit with less reach and slower maximum apertures at telephoto.

For casual use, the Olympus fascinates with telephoto potential; for sharper general-purpose zoom, Sony edges ahead, though with less magnification.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching Moments Without Delay

Speed and accuracy in autofocus (AF) can make or break action shots.

• Olympus SP-100: Employs contrast-detection AF with face detection and tracking. It supports continuous AF, selective, and multi-area focusing modes. Continuous shooting maxes out at 7fps, which allows decent capture of moderate action scenes.

• Sony H200: Also uses contrast-detection AF with face detection and tracking but lacks continuous autofocus during burst mode. It shoots at 8fps burst but only with single AF mode.

In real-world shooting, Olympus’s continuous AF tracking felt more reliable on moving subjects like wildlife or kids. Sony’s AF was slower to lock focus and prone to occasional hunting, particularly in low contrast or low light.

Battery and Storage: Going the Distance

Reliability in the field hinges on how long your gear can shoot before requiring recharge or card swaps.

• Olympus SP-100 runs on a proprietary LI-92B battery rated at approximately 330 shots per charge - solid for a camera with power-hungry zoom and EVF. Recharge takes about two hours.

• Sony H200 uses four AA batteries. This can be a blessing or a curse - easy to replace anywhere, but heavier and bulkier overall. The rated 240 shots per charge falls behind Olympus, especially considering rechargeable NiMH options are necessary for decent performance.

Both cameras have single SD card slots; Sony adds Memory Stick compatibility, which is a dying format and not much of a plus today.

Color, Image Processing, and Photo Genres: How Do These Cameras Perform Across the Board?

Having taken both cameras through diverse photographic scenarios - portraits, landscapes, wildlife, sports, street, macro, night photography, video, and travel - I’ve compiled a detailed genre-specific analysis.

Olympus SP 100 front Olympus SP 100 screen back Sony H200 front Sony H200 screen back

Portraits

Olympus edges out thanks to its more natural skin tones and better face detection AF. Wide aperture at the wide end (f/2.9) helps smooth background blur, though small sensor size fundamentally limits bokeh quality. Sony’s portraits look a bit flatter, affected by noisier images at indoor ISO settings.

Landscapes

Here, dynamic range and resolution matter. Neither camera excels in dynamic range - small sensors are inherently limited - but Olympus’s sensor technology again wins for better highlight retention. Olympus’s longer zoom can isolate distant landscape details, but Sony’s slightly higher megapixel count creates marginally crisper shots wide open.

Wildlife

The Olympus SP-100’s longer zoom and better continuous AF make it the preferred wildlife companion of these two. That said, both lag behind DSLR or mirrorless systems in tracking fast animals, so temper expectations.

Sports

Neither camera is ideal for fast sports, but Olympus’s faster continuous AF and a 7fps burst rate can handle moderate action. Sony’s lack of continuous AF during burst mode is a clear limitation.

Street Photography

Sony's smaller, lighter, and more discreet form factor offers better portability - a win for street shooters. Olympus’s bulk and louder zoom make it more noticeable. Both struggle in low light due to the small sensor sizes.

Macro

The Olympus’s 1cm minimum focusing distance outperforms Sony’s 20cm, allowing more detailed close-ups. Both have optical stabilization aiding handheld macro shots, but Olympus’s tighter macro focus range is a firm advantage.

Night and Astro

Neither camera is designed for astrophotography. Olympus’s higher native ISO ceiling (6400 vs 3200) and improved noise control let you eke out better night shots, but long exposures are limited, and star images require sturdy tripod support.

Video

Olympus delivers Full HD 1080p video at 60fps with H.264 codec and has a microphone input jack - a big plus for vloggers. Sony caps out at 720p and lacks a mic input, limiting video quality and audio options.

Travel

Olympus’s superior zoom range and decent battery life make it a flexible travel companion, albeit at the cost of size and weight. Sony wins on portability and cost.

Professional Use

Neither is suitable for professional applications requiring RAW, fast image transfer, or weather sealing. But Olympus offers better control and image quality to hobbyists learning and experimenting.

Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Ready for Adventure?

Both cameras have all-plastic builds with no weather sealing, dustproofing, or freezeproofing. Neither is ruggedized. Handle both carefully in tough outdoor conditions - rain or dusty environments are risky without protective gear.

Lens Compatibility: Fixed Zoom Lens Means No Expansion

A bridge camera’s biggest limitation: fixed lens means no swapping for better glass. You’re stuck with the built-in zoom. Olympus edges a bit with a 50x zoom (24–1200mm), which is a compelling range. The Sony’s 26.4x zoom tries to balance reach and compactness.

If your photography needs demand interchangeable lenses, these cameras won’t cut it.

Connectivity and Extras: Staying Connected or Flying Solo?

Olympus offers optional wireless connectivity (via separate accessory), HDMI out, and USB 2.0 ports.

Sony H200 has none of these features. No wireless, no HDMI-out, only USB 2.0.

Having HDMI out on Olympus means you can monitor or playback on bigger screens, and the optional Wi-Fi adapter allows limited remote control or image transfer, valuable in some workflows.

Price and Value: Stretching Every Dollar

At typical market prices (Olympus ~$400, Sony ~$250), both target cheapskate travelers and beginner enthusiasts.

• Olympus SP-100 commands a premium for longer zoom, better video, and EVF.

• Sony H200 appeals through affordability, lighter weight, and simpler operation.

Given Olympus’s superior feature set and performance, I find its higher price justified for those who want more versatility and control.

Final Performance Summary and Ratings

To give a quick, visual summary of their overall strengths, here’s a combined performance rating chart based on my testing.

And here’s a more detailed genre-specific scoring breakdown.

Who Should Buy Olympus SP-100?

• Photography enthusiasts craving serious zoom with decent manual controls
• Travel photographers needing a versatile all-in-one with respectable EVF
• Wildlife and landscape lovers wanting longer reach and improved image quality
• Videographers who want Full HD 1080p and microphone input
• Users prepared to carry a larger, heavier camera

Who Should Choose Sony H200?

• Budget buyers seeking the cheapest large-zoom camera on the market
• Casual travelers prioritizing smaller, lighter gear
• Street shooters wanting a discreet, simple point-and-shoot experience
• Beginners who prefer full-auto and don’t require creative control
• Users who appreciate AA battery convenience when away from charging options

Wrapping It Up: Which Bridge Superzoom Wins in 2024?

Neither the Olympus SP-100 nor the Sony H200 will satisfy the demands of serious professionals or advanced hobbyists craving mirrorless/DSLR quality. They cater to the entry-level superzoom niche, combining versatility with cost-conscious engineering.

That said, if you aspire to learn manual controls, want longer zoom reach, better image quality, and stronger video capabilities in a modestly sized bridge camera, the Olympus SP-100 stands out as the better overall package despite its higher price and bulk.

If you’re a cheapskate or want a lightweight backup point-and-shoot purely for casual, daylight shooting with minimal manual fuss, the Sony H200 delivers a respectable bang for your buck.

Choosing between these two boils down to balancing size, zoom range, image quality, and control palette against your budget and shooting style. In every bridge camera test I’ve done, the perfect compromise depends on what you prioritize most.

Hopefully, this hands-on breakdown has helped clarify these distinctions, spiced with practical insights from thousands of hours testing gear in the field. No cameras are perfect, but picking the one that suits you best is half the fun of photography.

Happy shooting!

- End of Comparison -