Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic SZ7
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e89e0/e89e088dc31aa10d231ae8106826494e9b701de0" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ7 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ7 front"
95 Imaging
37 Features
41 Overall
38
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic SZ7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 133g - 99 x 59 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic SZ7 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Panasonic SZ7, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the SZ7 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was revealed 24 months prior to the SZ7 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Tough-3000 matches up versus the SZ7 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic SZ7 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ7. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Panasonic SZ7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Panasonic SZ7
Tough-3000 | SZ7 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ7 over the Olympus Tough-3000
SZ7 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 24 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Panasonic SZ7
Tough-3000 | SZ7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic SZ7 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus Tough-3000 provides exterior measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Panasonic SZ7 has specifications of 99mm x 59mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
See the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Panasonic SZ7 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the SZ7.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96b4a/96b4aa2729522a53043b6592510037094904c6fb" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic SZ7 size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic SZ7 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and SZ7 is 94 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65baa/65baa505ec6a2459ebd7804e79dbb31ce46ea215" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic SZ7 top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic SZ7 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic SZ7 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and SZ7.
As you can see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Panasonic SZ7 to give greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2659/f26597c8757ca00ce9b315abf14c46b348d1aa5c" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic SZ7 sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic SZ7 sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic SZ7 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/871d5/871d5c84d0dad1281ce0795053cc3e6a7f438620" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic SZ7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic SZ7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Panasonic SZ7 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ7 |
Also Known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-01-07 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 4cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lbs) | 133 grams (0.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 99 x 59 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $0 | $199 |