Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-30
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
63 Imaging
57 Features
66 Overall
60
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 650g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Launched October 2012
- Newer Model is Pentax K-50
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-30 Overview
Here is a extensive analysis of the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Pentax K-30, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and K-30 (16MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and K-30 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Tough-3000 was manufactured 3 years before the K-30 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Tough-3000 matches up versus the K-30 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-30 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Pentax K-30. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Pentax K-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Pentax K-30
Tough-3000 | K-30 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-30 over the Olympus Tough-3000
K-30 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2012 | January 2010 | Fresher by 34 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Pentax K-30
Tough-3000 | K-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-30 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus Tough-3000 has outside dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-30 has specifications of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") having a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Pentax K-30 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Tough-3000 against the K-30.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and K-30 is 94 and 63 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-30 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching specs. The visual here should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Tough-3000 and K-30.
All in all, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Tough-3000 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Pentax K-30 will result in more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-30 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K-30 |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2012-10-29 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Prime M |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye,Slow Sync, Slow Sync+ Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lb) | 650 grams (1.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1129 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI109,4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $0 | $525 |