Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax X70
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
71 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax X70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 410g - 110 x 83 x 90mm
- Launched March 2009
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax X70 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax X70, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the X70 (12MP) is fairly similar and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Tough-3000 was brought out 11 months later than the X70 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Pentax X70 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the Tough-3000 matches up vs the X70 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax X70 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Pentax X70. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Pentax X70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Pentax X70
Tough-3000 | X70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | March 2009 | Fresher by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax X70 over the Olympus Tough-3000
X70 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Pentax X70
Tough-3000 | X70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal display measurement | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax X70 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 enjoys outside dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Pentax X70 has measurements of 110mm x 83mm x 90mm (4.3" x 3.3" x 3.5") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax X70 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the Tough-3000 vs the X70.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and X70 is 94 and 71 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax X70 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specifications. The graphic below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and X70.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution so you can expect similar quality of photos however you really should take the launch date of the products into consideration. The younger Tough-3000 should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax X70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax X70 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax X70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax X70 |
Alternative name | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-01-07 | 2009-03-02 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 50 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 9.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lb) | 410 gr (0.90 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 110 x 83 x 90mm (4.3" x 3.3" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $0 | $200 |