Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-10
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Later Model is Samsung GX-20
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-10, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the GX-10 (10MP) is pretty close but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) feature different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Tough-3000 was announced 3 years later than the GX-10 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise view of how the Tough-3000 scores against the GX-10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Samsung GX-10. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Samsung GX-10
| Tough-3000 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 |  | September 2006 | Fresher by 41 months |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 210k | Crisper screen (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| GX-10 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung GX-10
| Tough-3000 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 has external dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung GX-10 has dimensions of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") having a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the GX-10.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and GX-10 is 94 and 59 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by viewing specs. The graphic here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and GX-10.
All in all, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Tough-3000 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus Tough-3000 will provide you with greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The newer Tough-3000 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung GX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung GX-10 |
| Also referred to as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2010-01-07 | 2006-09-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159g (0.35 lbs) | 793g (1.75 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $850 |