Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX300
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31


86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Announced November 2013
- Old Model is Samsung NX210
- Successor is Samsung NX500

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX300, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) use different sensor sizing.

The Tough-3000 was revealed 4 years before the NX300 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the Tough-3000 grades vs the NX300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Samsung NX300. The full galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Samsung NX300
Tough-3000 | NX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Olympus Tough-3000
NX300 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 47 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3.3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 768k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+538k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung NX300
Tough-3000 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus Tough-3000 comes with physical dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX300 has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") having a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the Tough-3000 vs the NX300.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and NX300 is 94 and 86 respectively.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through specifications. The image underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and NX300.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Samsung NX300 will render greater detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung NX300 |
Also called | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-01-07 | 2013-11-24 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3.3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 768k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159g (0.35 pounds) | 331g (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $0 | $750 |