Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
58 Imaging
51 Features
76 Overall
61
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Replacement is Sony RX10 II
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and RX10 (20MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and RX10 (1") have totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Tough-3000 was introduced 5 years before the RX10 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Tough-3000 grades vs the RX10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10. The whole galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Sony RX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony RX10
Tough-3000 | RX10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 over the Olympus Tough-3000
RX10 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2014 | January 2010 | Fresher by 51 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1290k | 230k | Sharper display (+1060k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony RX10
Tough-3000 | RX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 provides outside measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony RX10 has dimensions of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") and a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the RX10.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and RX10 is 94 and 58 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing just by going over a spec sheet. The photograph here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and RX10.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Tough-3000 with its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh harder and the Sony RX10 will deliver more detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 |
Alternative name | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-01-07 | 2014-03-20 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,290 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | WhiteMagic |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 10.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) | 813 gr (1.79 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 474 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $0 | $698 |