Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX66
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28


97 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX66 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Announced February 2012

Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX66 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX66, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the 6000 (10MP) and TX66 (18MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The 6000 was announced 3 years earlier than the TX66 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX66 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the 6000 matches up against the TX66 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX66 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 6000 Gallery & Sony TX66 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Sony TX66
6000 | TX66 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX66 over the Olympus 6000
TX66 | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 32 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3.3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Sony TX66
6000 | TX66 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX66 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6000 offers physical measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Sony TX66 has measurements of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") accompanied by a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX66 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the 6000 against the TX66.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the 6000 and TX66 is 94 and 97 respectively.

Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX66 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by viewing specifications. The pic underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the 6000 and TX66.
Plainly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Sony TX66 to render extra detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged 6000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX66 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6000 vs Sony TX66 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 |
Other name | mju Tough 6000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3.3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 179 gr (0.39 pounds) | 109 gr (0.24 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $259 | $350 |