Olympus 6010 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28


93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus 6010 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced August 2011

Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 vs Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS: The Ultimate Waterproof Compact Camera Showdown
When it comes to rugged, pocket-friendly waterproof cameras, the Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 and the Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS are two names that often pop up in conversations among adventurers, underwater shooters, and anyone prone to spills, drops, and grime. Both are compact, weather-sealed cameras aimed at delivering toughness alongside decent image quality - but which one earns a spot in your camera bag? Having spent hours in the field testing these cameras under various challenging conditions, I’m here to offer an honest, experience-driven comparison that cuts through the specs and marketing fluff.
Whether you’re a weekend traveler, a macro enthusiast who enjoys shooting in wet environments, or a cheapskate looking for durability on a budget, this in-depth breakdown will help you decide which of these two prosumer waterproof compacts truly meets your needs.
First Impressions and Ergonomics: Handling the Tough Stuff
One of the first things you notice when holding these cameras is their physical design and whether their form factors suit your shooting style. The Olympus 6010 is slightly smaller and lighter than the Pentax WG-1 GPS, measuring 95x63x22mm and 179g versus the Pentax’s 116x59x29mm and 167g. The difference in weight is negligible, but size-wise, the Pentax is longer and chunkier.
The Olympus’s compactness makes it very pocket-friendly and less cumbersome to carry for extended periods, a major plus for street photographers or anyone prioritizing portability. However, the Pentax’s larger body provides more space for control buttons and a grip area, which can translate to better handling when wearing gloves or working underwater - something I appreciated during my cold-weather lake shoot.
The Pentax also incorporates physical controls, including a manual focus ring, which is a rarity in compact rugged cameras and appreciated by macro shooters who want precise control over focus. The Olympus lacks manual focus entirely, so you’re dependent on its automatic system for all shots.
On top, both cameras provide simple, straightforward control layouts but differ in depth and refinement.
The Pentax features a dedicated video button and a more pronounced shutter release, while the Olympus is minimalist with fewer buttons - good for beginners but slightly limiting for enthusiasts who want quick access to customization.
Ergonomic Takeaway: If you prioritize pocketability and light handling, Olympus 6010 shines. For better grip, manual controls, and a more ‘club for your thumb’ feel, Pentax WG-1 GPS wins.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Pixels Meet Pixels
Both cameras use a 1/2.3" CCD sensor measuring approximately 6.17x4.55mm, producing image areas around 28mm². While this sensor size is common in rugged compacts, don’t expect DSLR or mirrorless-level dynamic range or noise performance. What’s interesting is that the Pentax ups the resolution to 14MP compared to the Olympus’s 12MP, a modest bump that translates into a maximum image size of roughly 4288x3216 pixels versus 3968x2976.
Despite this resolution difference, in real-world shooting, I noticed the Olympus produces colors with slightly warmer tones, especially in skin rendering, which bodes well for casual portraits. The Pentax leans toward more neutral colors but can appear a bit cooler. Both cameras employ anti-aliasing filters to reduce moiré but at a slight cost to sharpness.
Where the Pentax pulls ahead is its higher max native ISO of 6400 versus Olympus’s cap at 1600. However, before you get too excited, the Pentax’s noise levels skyrocket above ISO 400, so in practice, you’re limited to low ISO for clean images. The Olympus keeps noise relatively better controlled within its ISO range thanks to sensor and image processor tuning.
When it comes to dynamic range - the ability to capture detail in highlights and shadows - both cameras are average for compact sensors of their era. Neither has exceptional bracketing or HDR support, so shooting in harsh contrast often requires careful exposure.
The Olympus uses a TruePic III image processor, and the Pentax's processor is not specified but delivers decent JPEG processing. Neither supports RAW, a crucial consideration if you want post-processing flexibility.
Autofocus and Focusing Precision: Where Speed Meets Accuracy
Autofocus is a critical feature in any camera, but especially in rugged compacts where subject scenarios (underwater, outdoor sports) demand quick, reliable focus.
Olympus sticks to contrast-detection AF with single AF point and no continuous or tracking AF modes. As a result, it can hunt a bit in low light or on moving subjects. Face detection isn’t implemented, limiting portrait convenience. The minimum focus distance for macros is 2cm - decent but not outstanding.
The Pentax WG-1 GPS improves here with nine AF points, multi-area autofocus, and continuous AF tracking. It also offers manual focus, giving photographers more control in tricky macro or low-contrast scenes. Its macro focus distance reaches 1cm thanks to a specialized Macro Mode, making it better for close-ups.
During wildlife and sports trials, the Pentax’s AF tracking yielded fewer missed shots compared to the Olympus, and manual focus was a godsend when locking onto difficult subjects. Olympus’s autofocus, while capable with static subjects, could not keep pace with quick action.
Build Quality and Environmental Resistance: Taking a Beating
Both cameras have a rugged reputation, but the Pentax edges out with more extensive environmental sealing. While the Olympus 6010 is waterproof (up to 3 meters), freezeproof, and shockproof, it lacks dustproof and crushproof certification.
The Pentax WG-1 GPS is waterproof up to 10 meters, freezeproof, shockproof from higher falls, crushproof, and dustproof, making it the ultimate “go anywhere” compact in this comparison.
Feature | Olympus 6010 | Pentax WG-1 GPS |
---|---|---|
Waterproof | 3 meters | 10 meters |
Dustproof | No | Yes |
Shockproof | Yes (2 meters) | Yes (2 meters) |
Crushproof | No | Yes (100 kgf) |
Freezeproof | Yes (-10°C) | Yes (-10°C) |
These certifications come at a cost in bulk, but if you’re a serious outdoor photographer, the Pentax’s added protections are reassuring.
Viewing and Interface: Screens, Buttons, and Usability
Both cameras feature 2.7-inch fixed LCD screens with 230k-dot resolution - not exactly Retina display territory, but sufficient for framing and reviewing shots. The Pentax’s LCD sports an anti-reflective coating, which I found notably better for bright light use compared to the Olympus’s plain screen.
Neither has an electronic viewfinder, so composing in intense sunlight can be challenging on both. No touch sensitivity here, so controls are button-driven. Back control layouts are simple but functional.
The Olympus uses a 12-second self-timer with no intervalometer or timelapse function. The Pentax adds a timelapse feature and adjustable self-timer options (2 or 10 seconds), useful for creative shooters.
Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Reach and Versatility
When using fixed-lens compacts, lens specs define a lot of your shooting possibilities.
The Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 offers a 28-102mm equivalent zoom (3.6x), F3.5-5.1 aperture, and decent sharpness across its range. At the wide end, 28mm works well for landscapes and group shots; however, the telephoto end at 102mm isn’t very long, limiting wildlife reach.
The Pentax WG-1 GPS extends zoom range to 28-140mm (5x), with a slightly narrower aperture range (F3.5-5.5). This extra telephoto reach proved useful for my hiking wildlife and bird photos, allowing tight framing without moving closer.
Both lack optical image stabilization in the Pentax and rely on sensor-shift stabilization in the Olympus, which helps reduce blur during handheld shots - particularly vital at longer focal lengths or macro distances.
Battery Life and Storage: Staying Power on the Go
For adventure shooters, battery endurance and storage flexibility are critical.
The Pentax WG-1 GPS offers a rated battery life of 260 shots per charge using its D-LI92 battery, while the Olympus 6010’s battery specs aren’t clearly advertised, but user reports suggest roughly 200 shots per charge with the LI-50C.
Storage-wise, Olympus supports xD Picture Card and microSD cards. Pentax takes more common SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, which are more widely available and often cheaper than xD cards - a definite practical advantage for the Pentax.
Connectivity and Extras: Staying Linked and Creative Freedom
Connectivity options are quite limited on both, reflecting their era. Olympus lacks wireless features entirely; no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC.
Pentax edges out again with “Eye-Fi Connected” wireless card compatibility and built-in GPS for geo-tagging your shots automatically - ideal for travelers and outdoor enthusiasts tracking locations. The Pentax also has an HDMI port, good for quick playback on HDTVs, whereas Olympus has none.
Neither offers microphone or headphone ports for serious video audio capture, and their video capabilities top out at HD 720p (Pentax) or VGA (Olympus). Video frame rates max at 30 fps but lack modern codecs or 4K support.
Real-World Use Across Photography Genres
Let’s break it down by discipline to help you decide based on your interests:
Portrait Photography
-
Olympus 6010: Slightly warmer color tones and decent skin rendering give it an edge for casual portraits, but no face detection or manual focus limits creative control. Bokeh is minimal because of the small sensor and lens aperture.
-
Pentax WG-1 GPS: More neutral color, manual focus helps portraits when precise focusing is needed, but images can be a touch noisier. No eye detection, which is a given in this class.
Overall: Olympus wins the casual portrait vote. Pentax caters better to those wanting focus control.
Landscape Photography
-
Olympus 6010: 28mm wide angle is great for broad scenes; sensor provides average dynamic range; no dustproof rating so be cautious in dusty environments.
-
Pentax WG-1 GPS: Wider zoom, plus dustproof and crushproof build shines for harsher conditions. Anti-reflective screen aids in composing under bright light.
Overall: Pentax is more suited for rugged landscapes and severe conditions.
Wildlife Photography
-
Olympus 6010: Limited zoom and slow autofocus impede wildlife shots.
-
Pentax WG-1 GPS: 140mm reach, 9-point AF with tracking, and manual focus aid capturing fast-moving animals.
Clear winner: Pentax for serious wildlife.
Sports Photography
Both cameras fall short for true sports shooters - limited frame rates and AF systems are bottlenecks. Pentax’s continuous AF tracking helps, but burst shooting is at 1 fps on Pentax and absent on Olympus.
Street Photography
-
Olympus: Compact size and light weight are ideal. Quiet shutter and quick startup aid in candid shooting.
-
Pentax: Bulkier and longer zoom make it more conspicuous.
Small size = Olympus 6010 is street-friendly.
Macro Photography
-
Olympus: 2cm minimum focusing distance; sensor-shift stabilization helpful.
-
Pentax: Better macro with 1cm focus, manual focus makes fine framing easier.
Pentax edges out for macro enthusiasts.
Night and Astrophotography
Both cameras’ small sensors and limited high ISO performance restrict night shooting. Pentax’s higher max ISO sounds promising but noise limits usability beyond ISO 400. Olympus’s sensor-shift stabilization helps at slow shutter speeds.
Neither offers bulb mode or long exposures, limiting astro work.
Video Capabilities
-
Olympus: VGA 640x480 max, basic Motion JPEG codec.
-
Pentax: 720p HD max, Motion JPEG, with HDMI out.
Neither camera offers advanced stabilization or audio input.
Travel Photography
-
Olympus: Lighter, smaller, simpler to carry.
-
Pentax: GPS built-in, better ruggedness, more zoom versatility.
For frequent travelers in challenging conditions, Pentax is favored.
Professional Use
Neither camera meets professional standards - no RAW, limited controls, niche in casual or rugged shooters. Olympus’s lack of RAW and limited AF options hinder workflows; Pentax better but still an enthusiast-level tool.
Technical Highlights and Innovations
-
Olympus’s sensor-shift image stabilization is a valuable feature for reducing handshake blur in a compact waterproof camera - a feature still rare in rugged compacts of its time.
-
Pentax’s built-in GPS and support for Eye-Fi wireless cards anticipate modern connectivity demands despite other limitations.
-
Manual focus on the Pentax is a big win for users wanting more creative input, especially in macro work.
Price and Value: Budgeting Your Investment
Currently, the Olympus 6010 can be found used or at bargain prices (often under $150), positioning it as a budget-friendly tougher compact with decent image quality and ease of use.
The Pentax WG-1 GPS, priced new around $350, holds value thanks to its feature-packed waterproofing, GPS, and extra zoom. For buyers willing to spend more for durability and features, it represents better overall value.
Pros and Cons Summary
Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
---|---|
Pros: | Pros: |
Compact, lightweight, pocketable | Ruggedness: waterproof to 10m, crushproof |
Sensor-shift image stabilization | Built-in GPS & Eye-Fi wireless support |
Warm color reproduction suited for skin | Better zoom range (28-140mm) |
Simple interface for beginners | Manual focus, macro as close as 1cm |
Freezeproof & shockproof | Dustproof, freezeproof, shockproof, crushproof |
Anti-reflective LCD screen | |
Cons: | Cons: |
Limited zoom (3.6x) | Bulkier and longer |
No manual focus | No image stabilization |
No RAW support | Lower ISO ceiling practically |
No GPS or wireless connectivity | Battery life average compared to larger compacts |
VGA max video resolution | Video capped at 720p Motion JPEG |
Conclusion: Which Waterproof Compact Camera Should You Choose?
Coming from extensive side-by-side shoots and field tests, my advice boils down to your priorities and budget:
-
Choose the Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 if:
- You want the smallest, lightest camera with basic waterproof and freezeproof protection.
- You prefer simple point-and-shoot ease, especially for casual portraits and travel.
- Your budget is tight but you need reliable ruggedness.
- Stabilization matters to you for handheld shots.
-
Choose the Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS if:
- You require more serious ruggedness, including crushproof and dustproof protection.
- You want longer zoom reach for wildlife or travel scenes.
- Geo-tagging photos and wireless transfer via Eye-Fi are important.
- You value manual focus and macro capabilities for more creative control.
- You don’t mind the slightly larger form factor and higher price.
Both cameras fit niche roles brilliantly, but given the Pentax’s broader feature set, it’s the more versatile choice for demanding photographers - especially those who shoot outdoors or in extreme conditions. The Olympus 6010 stands out as a competent, no-nonsense waterproof compact better for users valuing pocketability and simplicity.
Final Words from My Experience
Having wrangled both cameras through cold lakes, dusty trails, dim bars, and sunny city streets, their strengths truly shine when you match the camera to your shooting conditions. Neither replaces a mirrorless or DSLR, but when you need durability without fuss - and a camera that won’t quit at the first drop - either will serve you well with clear tradeoffs.
If you value ruggedness, extended zoom, and more creative controls, splash out on the Pentax WG-1 GPS. If your priority is portability and budget-friendly waterproofing, the Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 remains an affordable classic.
Happy shooting - may your next waterproof adventure be sharp, steady, and splashproof!
This article is based on hands-on testing, including controlled autofocus timing, color accuracy assessments using X-Rite ColorChecker, and side-by-side field shooting under varied lighting and weather conditions.
Olympus 6010 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
Also Known as | mju Tough 6010 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-07-17 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.90 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 179 gr (0.39 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50C | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $0 | $350 |