Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ30W
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
- Additionally Known as WB600
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
Here is a in-depth assessment of the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung HZ30W, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the CX1 (9MP) and HZ30W (12MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe CX1 was introduced 11 months prior to the HZ30W and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a short summary of how the CX1 matches up versus the HZ30W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX1 & Samsung HZ30W. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX1 Gallery & Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Samsung HZ30W
| CX1 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Ricoh CX1
| HZ30W | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 11 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX1 and Samsung HZ30W
| CX1 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh CX1 has got outer measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Samsung HZ30W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX1 versus Samsung HZ30W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the CX1 versus the HZ30W.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX1 and HZ30W is 93 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing a spec sheet. The visual here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the CX1 and HZ30W.
Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Samsung HZ30W to result in extra detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The older CX1 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh CX1 vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
| Ricoh CX1 | Samsung HZ30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh CX1 | Samsung HZ30W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB600 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-02-19 | 2010-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.2 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 180g (0.40 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | DB-70 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $299 | $280 |
