Olympus 6010 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus 6010 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
Olympus 6010 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
The following is a extended review of the Olympus 6010 versus Pentax WG-3 GPS, both Waterproof cameras by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the 6010 (12MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 6010 was revealed 5 years earlier than the WG-3 GPS which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the 6010 scores versus the WG-3 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 6010 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 and Pentax WG-3 GPS. The full galleries are available at Olympus 6010 Gallery and Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
6010 | WG-3 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Olympus 6010
WG-3 GPS | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2013 | July 2009 | Newer by 48 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
6010 | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus 6010 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6010 has got physical measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Pentax WG-3 GPS has measurements of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 6010 versus Pentax WG-3 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the 6010 versus the WG-3 GPS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the 6010 and WG-3 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 6010 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching a spec sheet. The image below might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the 6010 and WG-3 GPS.
Clearly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Pentax WG-3 GPS to result in more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged 6010 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 6010 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6010 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6010 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-07-17 | 2013-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.40 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 179g (0.39 pounds) | 238g (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50C | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $0 | $350 |