Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF2
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33


88 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 310g - 113 x 68 x 33mm
- Released February 2011
- Old Model is Panasonic GF1
- Replacement is Panasonic GF3

Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF2: An Expert Comparison for the Discerning Photographer
Choosing between two cameras from different categories and eras can be tricky, especially when their specs seem so different on paper. Today, we’re diving deep into the Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 - a rugged waterproof compact - and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2, an entry-level mirrorless from Panasonic’s Micro Four Thirds lineup. Both announced a year apart (2010 and 2011 respectively), these cameras target distinct user needs. But how do they actually perform across the diverse world of photography? Let’s break it down.
Through thousands of hours of hands-on testing, sensor analysis, and real-world shooting scenarios, we’ll help you understand which camera suits your shoot style and creative intentions best.
Designed for Different Worlds: Overview and Handling
Size, Ergonomics, and Build Quality
The Olympus 6020 is engineered for durability and adventure - lightweight (122g) and compact with dimensions of 95x62x22mm. Its small stature and rugged environmental sealing make it the perfect travel buddy if you are into underwater, freeze-proof, or shockproof shooting conditions. The fixed lens simplifies usage, at the cost of flexibility.
The Panasonic GF2, meanwhile, is a more substantial 310g with larger dimensions (113x68x33mm). It sports a modular body style typical of mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras, offering superior grip and an interface better suited for manual controls and advanced shooting. However, it lacks rugged sealing, so outdoor cautiousness is advised.
The control layout favors the GF2’s more complex interface, with dedicated exposure modes and customizable buttons befitting photographers who want manual exposure control and quick adjustment. The Olympus feels simpler and more streamlined, great if you want point-and-shoot convenience with rugged protection.
Bottom line: If you need a tough, pocketable camera you won’t worry about in harsh conditions, Olympus 6020 stands out. For ergonomics offering manual control enthusiasts will love, Panasonic GF2 wins.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality Fundamentals
This is where the cameras show their fundamental differences.
Specification | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.08x4.56mm) | Four Thirds (17.3x13mm) |
Sensor Area | 27.7 mm² | 224.9 mm² |
Resolution | 13 MP | 12 MP |
Max Native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
RAW Support | No | Yes |
The GF2’s Four Thirds sensor is approximately 8x larger in area than the Olympus’s 1/2.3" smaller sensor. This ample sensor real estate lets the GF2 capture more light and detail, which translates into better dynamic range, color fidelity, and low-light performance. Its CMOS technology supports higher ISO sensitivity, reaching up to 6400 natively with usable image quality, while the Olympus tops out at ISO 1600 and generally struggles in dim conditions.
Though the 6020 boasts a higher megapixel count (13MP vs 12MP), in practice, the larger sensor size and superior processor in the GF2 deliver sharper, cleaner images, especially under challenging lighting.
Recommendation: For landscapes, portraits, and any imagery demanding rich tonal gradation and low noise, the GF2 is the technical winner.
Shooting Scenarios: Practical Performance and Autofocus
Autofocus Systems and Speed
Feature | Olympus 6020 | Panasonic GF2 |
---|---|---|
AF System | Contrast Detection (single, tracking) | Contrast Detection with Face Detection & 23 AF points |
Continuous AF | No | Yes |
Face Detection | No | Yes |
AF Tracking Mode | Yes, but basic | Yes, advanced |
The Olympus 6020 uses a straightforward contrast-detection autofocus system, with single AF and basic tracking. It lacks face detection and continuous AF modes, limiting its ability to track fast-moving subjects accurately.
The Panasonic GF2, on the other hand, features 23 AF points with face detection and contrast detection autofocus capable of continuous operation. This makes it more versatile for moving subjects like children, pets, or street photography. The contrast detection remains slower than modern hybrid or phase-detection autofocus cameras but was solid for its time.
In the field, we found the GF2 more reliable and responsive focusing, especially in good light. The Olympus 6020’s AF performance suits casual shooting but can frustrate if tracking action or macro close-ups requiring precise focus.
Photography Genres: Which Camera Excels?
We assessed both cameras across key photography styles, leveraging their specs and practical insights.
Portrait Photography
-
Olympus 6020:
Offers a fixed 28-140mm (equiv.) F3.9-5.9 lens with reasonable optical reach but lacks aperture control. You cannot blur backgrounds effectively (limited bokeh), and skin tones feel average due to smaller sensor limitations. No face or eye-detection autofocus. -
Panasonic GF2:
Interchangeable lens mount with access to fast primes (e.g., 20mm f/1.7), allowing creamy bokeh and shallow depth-of-field. Real manual exposure and white balance control on the GF2 enable fine-tuning skin tone reproduction. Its face detection autofocus helps secure tack-sharp portraits.
Verdict: The GF2 is your go-to for dedicated portrait photography.
Landscape Photography
-
Olympus 6020:
Rugged, weatherproof design enables shooting in demanding outdoor settings without a protective cover. The wide-angle 28mm equivalent focal length covers broad scenes, but the smaller sensor limits dynamic range and resolution. -
Panasonic GF2:
Larger sensor and lens system excel in capturing detail and wider tonal range, at the cost of less environmental sealing. The GF2’s higher resolution and RAW support yield excellent post-processing flexibility.
Verdict: Choose Olympus for adventurous, rugged landscape shooting; choose Panasonic for quality and detail.
Wildlife and Sports
Both cameras are challenged here, but differences stand out:
-
Olympus 6020’s burst rate is 5 fps (frames per second) but limited AF speed and tracking capabilities hamper fast action shooting.
-
Panasonic GF2 presents slower continuous shooting (3 fps) but benefits from better AF tracking and better sensor performance at higher ISOs.
Neither camera is truly ideal for sports; you’d want a dedicated DSLR or mirrorless with phase-detection AF and higher frame rates.
Street and Travel Photography
-
Olympus 6020: Compact, light, and rugged - ideal for spontaneous street shooting and rough travel conditions. Waterproof and freeze-proof properties make it perfect for extreme environments like beaches or mountain hikes.
-
Panasonic GF2: Larger and more conspicuous but offers more creative control and image quality. If you pair it with a small prime lens, the GF2 is still quite portable.
Macro Photography
The Olympus 6020 shines with its 1 cm macro focusing capability. This is impressive for a rugged compact and lets you get close to fine details, such as flowers or insects, despite its fixed lens.
The GF2’s macro performance depends on the lens you choose. Some Micro Four Thirds lenses offer excellent macro magnification and stabilization, but extra investment is necessary.
Night and Astro Photography
The 6020’s smaller sensor and ISO limit (max 1600) mean it struggles under low light.
The GF2’s larger sensor, high ISO range, and ability to shoot in RAW allow better long exposure and noise management, making it suitable for night and astro photography, provided you use a tripod.
Video Capabilities
Camera | Video Specs |
---|---|
Olympus 6020 | 1280x720p @ 30 fps, H.264 |
Panasonic GF2 | Full HD 1920x1080p @ 60 fps, AVCHD & MJPEG |
The Panasonic GF2 provides significantly better video specs, including full HD at 60 fps, enabling smoother motion video and more flexibility in post-processing.
The Olympus 6020's video is limited to 720p 30 fps, adequate for casual movies but not for serious videography enthusiasts.
Professional Work and Workflow Integration
The Olympus 6020’s lack of RAW support limits post-production control - less suited for professional workflows requiring color grading and image retouching.
The Panasonic GF2 supports RAW files, exposure bracketing, and advanced white balance control, fitting better into a professional workflow. Its Micro Four Thirds mount gives you access to a wide lens ecosystem, beneficial for specialized applications.
User Interface, Screen, and Connectivity
-
Olympus 6020 has a 2.7-inch, low-resolution screen (230k dots), fixed and non-touch.
-
Panasonic GF2 sports a 3-inch touchscreen LCD (460k dots) with TFT wide viewing angles, offering easier navigation and focus selection.
Neither has an electronic viewfinder, potentially hindering eye-level shooting. Both rely on rear LCD for composition.
Battery, Storage, and Connectivity
-
Olympus uses a Li-50B battery; battery life lacks official rating but expected to be moderate given compact design.
-
Panasonic GF2 offers around 300 shots per charge with a rechargeable battery pack.
Both use SD/SDHC storage, but Panasonic supports SDXC cards for large capacity.
Neither has wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi/Bluetooth/NFC), which is a drawback given modern standards.
Price and Value Analysis
Camera | Price (at launch or current approximate) | Strengths | Drawbacks |
---|---|---|---|
Olympus 6020 | Approx $279 | Rugged, compact, macro close focusing | Limited manual control, small sensor, no RAW |
Panasonic GF2 | Approx $330 | Large sensor, interchangeable lenses, RAW support | No weather sealing, bulkier |
In today’s used and entry-level markets, the Panasonic GF2 commands a premium for its sensor and lens system, catering to beginners who want to learn manual exposure and image quality control.
The Olympus 6020 appeals mainly to adventure photographers prioritizing durability and simplicity.
Sample Image Gallery
Observing sample images side by side, you notice:
-
Panasonic GF2 delivers richer colors, sharper detail, and smoother gradients, especially in shadows and highlights.
-
Olympus 6020’s images look softer, with less dynamic range and noise at higher ISOs.
Overall Performance Rating
Based on our comprehensive tests examining image quality, build, speed, features, and value:
-
Panasonic GF2 scores higher overall for versatility and image quality.
-
Olympus 6020 scores highest for ruggedness and simplicity.
Genre-Specific Strengths: Where They Shine
Genre | Olympus 6020 | Panasonic GF2 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Moderate | Excellent |
Landscape | Good | Excellent |
Wildlife | Moderate | Good |
Sports | Low | Moderate |
Street | Excellent | Good |
Macro | Good | Very Good |
Night/Astro | Low | Good |
Video | Basic | Good |
Travel | Excellent | Moderate |
Professional Work | Low | Good |
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
The Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 is a niche machine: a tiny, sturdy camera built for those who put reliability in harsh environments first. If your photography style involves rugged outdoor activities like hiking, snorkeling, or winter sports, the 6020’s waterproof, freeze-proof design will shield your creativity under extreme conditions. Its fixed lens and simple operation make it a point-and-shoot tool that performs well for casual photography and exploration. Macro enthusiasts will appreciate its close focusing ability straight out of the box.
The Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 is a perfect step into the mirrorless interchangeable lens world for beginners and enthusiasts desiring more artistic control and image quality. Its large Four Thirds sensor, RAW support, and flexible Micro Four Thirds lens mount let you grow your creative skill set. With manual exposure options, face detection, and respectable video capabilities, the GF2 can handle events, portraits, landscapes, and even moderate low-light situations. As your knowledge deepens, you can swap lenses to suit wildlife, macro, or street shooting needs.
Who should pick the Olympus 6020?
- You want a lightweight, waterproof, and shockproof camera that keeps working where others might fail.
- Prefer simple operation without fussing over manual controls.
- Need a camera for travel to challenging environments.
- Want decent macro and wide-to-telephoto reach in a pocket-sized package.
Who should go for the Panasonic GF2?
- You want an easy entry into interchangeable lens photography.
- Need superior image quality, manual controls, and RAW for editing.
- Plan to shoot portraits, landscapes, or video with creative intent.
- Are okay with a less rugged, but more capable camera body.
Getting Started with Accessories
-
For the Olympus 6020: Consider extra batteries, floating straps, or waterproof cases if pushing limits.
-
For Panasonic GF2: Invest first in prime lenses like the Panasonic 20mm F1.7 or Olympus 45mm F1.8 for portrait and street work.
Final Tip
If possible, handle both cameras before purchase to see which fits your shooting style ergonomically and creatively. Testing real images from the cameras based on your personal subject matter will help you make a lasting investment.
Photography is a journey of gradual mastery. Whether capturing rugged adventures or refining artistic expression, both the Olympus 6020 and Panasonic GF2 offer pathways tailored to different creative drives. Now that you have this in-depth comparison, you can confidently choose the right companion for your photographic exploration.
Happy shooting!
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF2 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2011-02-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 lbs) | 310g (0.68 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 68 x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 506 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $279 | $330 |