Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX350
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
62 Imaging
46 Features
51 Overall
48
Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Released December 2016
Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX350 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus 6020 and Sony HX350, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and HX350 (20MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe 6020 was launched 7 years prior to the HX350 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the 6020 scores against the HX350 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX350 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Sony HX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sony HX350
6020 | HX350 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Olympus 6020
HX350 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2016 | February 2010 | More recent by 83 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sony HX350
6020 | HX350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 6020 has external measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Sony HX350 has sizing of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") with a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 6020 and Sony HX350 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the 6020 against the HX350.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and HX350 is 95 and 62 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over technical specs. The graphic here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 6020 and HX350.
As you can tell, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Sony HX350 to offer more detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images more aggressively. The older 6020 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Sony HX350 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
Also referred to as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2016-12-20 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 202k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122 grams (0.27 lb) | 652 grams (1.44 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $279 | - |