Olympus 6020 vs Sony T900
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus 6020 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009
Olympus 6020 vs Sony T900 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Olympus 6020 vs Sony T900, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the T900 (12MP) is very close and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 6020 was unveiled 12 months after the T900 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the 6020 scores against the T900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony T900 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sony T900
6020 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2010 | February 2009 | Newer by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus 6020
T900 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sony T900
6020 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6020 offers external measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 6020 vs Sony T900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the 6020 compared to the T900.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and T900 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specs. The picture here may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the 6020 and T900.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should expect to see the Olympus 6020 to render extra detail having an extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent 6020 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 6020 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 lbs) | 143g (0.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $279 | $300 |